Mafiascum.net

In post 1376, nomnomnom wrote:I don't want to waste a mislynch on me considering that we profit from revisiting other slots.

You will learn absolutely nothing about the scumteam by lynching me. You'll end up in day 3 scratching your head and stuff. I'm a bad lynch.

I still think Aaron is a good lynch by the by. His last posts feel like preparation to justify a vote on me. Keep this in mind if you actually go through lynching me today.

this is awful

In post 1389, Sirfetchd wrote:Hey all. My house flooded at the end of yesterday. Still sorting stuff out but I'm mostly fine. Expect me to take a backseat for a little though, my game time will be reduced to posting while wagging off work at the moment.

oh no!

i hope the situation is under control and that there isn't too much damage, hope things get easier for you soon

In post 1389, Sirfetchd wrote:Can someone talk me though the nom suspicion bc I don't see the Billy wagon presenting much info other than skit town?

i mean ... look at her iso
she spends quite a long while opposing the billy wagon, refusing to take a stand on him, and trying to change people's minds about billy

In post 1397, skitter30 wrote:i feel like if it's like 5 hours ot deadline or whatever and the game is dead and it's day1 you just vote whoever needs to be voted to make a wagon happen and the fact that he needed to be prodded to vote is ???

Two questions:

1. Why do I have to vote when there is still time left and I had questions I would have liked to have been answered? I was aware that my vote would be the hammer, which in turn means that the day ends whenever the moderator is available to process the action.
   
2. Why do players here make such a big deal around activity instead of words, reason, and action? I apologize for my life.

I believe you are town given current evidence, but I think you look at things in a myopic manner.

In post 1399, skitter30 wrote:i mean the hammer had to happen, i'm more weirded out that he had to be prodded to hammer

For example: this is not a truthful statement. I was unaware of the amount of time left in the day. The moderator sent me a private message to let me know that I had not posted within the require timeframe. I then proceed to catch up as I stated that I did in post 1300. I believe the rest of the actions that occurred are recent enough to be clear.

In post 1311, Sujimichi wrote:

In post 1307, Luca Blight wrote:I don’t get Suji’s no-vote. Why not either vote Billy, your bigger scumread, or make a push for Kerset, your biggest scumread?

I'm still here. Why should I vote at the moment when:

1. I asked a question I wanted an answer to; and,
   
2. we still have time?

In post 1314, Sujimichi wrote:VOTE: Billy Pilgrim

i don't understand this progression in the context of your response

In post 1400, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1376, nomnomnom wrote:I don't want to waste a mislynch on me considering that we profit from revisiting other slots.

You will learn absolutely nothing about the scumteam by lynching me. You'll end up in day 3 scratching your head and stuff. I'm a bad lynch.

I still think Aaron is a good lynch by the by. His last posts feel like preparation to justify a vote on me. Keep this in mind if you actually go through lynching me today.

this is awful

What do you believe this post to be awful?

tone

it's generic and feels LAMIST-y

again there's the whole 'reacting to a potential lynch as if it's immediate' when it, in actuality, is not; this always looks survivalistic to me

In post 1406, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1311, Sujimichi wrote:

In post 1307, Luca Blight wrote:I don’t get Suji’s no-vote. Why not either vote Billy, your bigger scumread, or make a push for Kerset, your biggest scumread?

I'm still here. Why should I vote at the moment when:

1. I asked a question I wanted an answer to; and,
   
2. we still have time?

In post 1314, Sujimichi wrote:VOTE: Billy Pilgrim

i don't understand this progression in the context of your response

The opposing wagon on Xayah further degraded to a point of non-relevance, and I was unlikely to get an answer to my query without it. Billy Pilgrim was in my lower tier for the majority of the day phase, and I was fine with him being the lynch.

In post 1408, skitter30 wrote:this always looks survivalistic to me

This resonates with me.

VOTE: nomnomnom

that makes more sense to me, i guess

that's 5 votes btw

UNVOTE:

That is too quick.

suji you don't get meaningful wagonomics if you panic every time a meaningful wagon happens

who's vote/s worry/ies you?

> implying you do get meaningful wagonomics otherwise

these later two votes do worry me a bit, ngl

suji's vote worried me

why'd you vote then

Suji, when I made my initial comment about you not voting Billy was still L-2, so your vote wouldn’t have been the hammer at that point. Due to your lack of activity i wasn’t sure if you were intending to vote or planning to disappear again until D2.

Regarding your point about activity, I think it’s fair to say you’ve been scumread this game for both activity and content. That said, you’re probably Town only due to the Billy interactions.

This is a pacy wagon, but it feels pretty townie. I want to hear from Flubs tho - I saw him online a while ago so I’m surprised he hasn’t at least popped his head in to say hi.

In post 1415, Wooper wrote:suji you don't get meaningful wagonomics if you panic every time a meaningful wagon happens

who's vote/s worry/ies you?

I'm not sure what wagonomics are, but there is an interesting dynamic between AaronFrost and nomnomnom I would like to see continue.

What was concerning about either vote?

suji are you an alt?

In post 1419, skitter30 wrote:why'd you vote then

basically
because i know i'm town
and i was interested in seeing what would happen