Mafiascum.net

In post 1344, Eve wrote:wait how did you know i was scum?

This is a pretty blatant scumslip, I can’t imagine Town saying this.

In post 1353, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I believe Battle Mage claimed he was roleblocked on night 2 if i’m not mistaken? If that is really true then i suppose Looker being targeted by a succesful simple shot is proof that he cannot be a scum roleblocker.
Battle Mage, can you confirm if this is true?

Townie thought-processing.

In post 1354, Egix96 wrote:

In post 1316, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Luca/Battle Mage/Egix locktown

Riabi, Eve, Looker the suspicious people.

Move eve up, I would've died if she were scum.

You could say that about anyone, though?

The Churros NK was surprising regardless.

In post 1375, Eve wrote:huh alright then

i didn't realise Battle Mage was the one who "caught" Zantetsu

VOTE: Norwee

i'll check Riabi tonight

So how did you think Zantetsu was caught, then?

In post 1377, Eve wrote:also norwee pushing looker despite the evidence was kind of eh

This is super opportunistic.

Did you read Norwegian’s 1353?

But so is this:

In post 1380, Riabi wrote:

In post 1378, Luca Blight wrote:We’re definitely not lynching the Norwegian slot today.

Yeah, why, he's scummy as hell.

VOTE: Norwe

If Eve somehow isn’t scum, then it’s Riabi for sure.

In post 1381, Eve wrote:fwiw i think norwee/egix getting replaced is completely nai and it's pointless (and forbidden) to talk about it

This is very weird and self-conscious, because I made no reference to the replace-outs and yet Eve assumes my suspicion of her stems from that.

Ok, my mind is made up. Lynch in this order for the win: Eve -> Riabi.

VOTE: Eve

but but that was a joke Luca...

it's okay i survived one day phase without being lynched which is all i was aiming for really

Battle Mage should check Riabi and a conflict should arise one way or another

if Battle Mage dies it's almost certainly just Riabi

What was a joke?

In post 1344, Eve wrote:wait how did you know i was scum?

this i thought it was kinda obvious

It wasn't obvious, especially when you haven't mentioned it until now despite Looker also calling you out on it.

I've re-read the Churros-Eve interaction from yesterday, and I'm reasonably happy that the neighbouriser claim stacks up (although, contrary to what Eve asserted today, it was far from obvious to me that anything like that was going on at the time). I think Looker confirmed it today too. Presumably that's what Churros was referring to yesterday when he said something weird had happened the previous night which confirms me as town - another neighbourhood increases the value of the PT cop. Although isn't it more likely that the neighboriser would be scum than town, otherwise it means I've nearly got as much chance of hitting town at night as scum, which makes the role pretty useless (not that isn't already since I claimed).

Eve's ISO is not pleasant reading:

In post 1179, Eve wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage for being weirdly flippant in a maybe scummy way

Zantetsu is still town

Eve had not read anything in the game (presumably besides the previous page or 2 to realise Zant was picking up some votes), but instinctively defends him and attacks me.

In post 1187, Eve wrote:hmm well this is awkward

VOTE: Egix

Next vote is for Egix who is about as confirmed town as it gets.

In post 1221, Eve wrote:norwee and battle mage seem like trustworthy individuals

i didn't know Egix had claimed FN - i voted him based off the final vc from yesterday

Confirms that the reason for voting Egix is because he hammered Zant-scum the previous day.

In post 1309, Eve wrote:

In post 1303, Egix96 wrote:Eve next

how dare you

i'm killing you tonight

Hinting at being a Vig? Or claiming scum?

In post 1330, Eve wrote:what

why would you investigate Churros after what he said yesterday?

Not sure why Eve is so angry I investigated Churros last night. Presumably if I'd been successful, and hadn't died, I could have confirmed them as neighbours. At the time, Churros was being mysterious and hadn't claimed, so felt like a good target. But not clear why it invoked that reaction.

In post 1340, Eve wrote:the hood's only open at night btw

my predecessor targeted Saudade night 1 and failed

i think Battle Mage is scum and checking Churros instead of anyone useful is really scummy - especially given how much Churros and i kinda made it obvious there was something going in there yesterday

VOTE: Battle Mage

Ah, it was to set up a vote.

In post 1344, Eve wrote:wait how did you know i was scum?

In post 1345, Eve wrote:oh i misinterpreted the question

yes i could be a scum neighbouriser - this doesn't confirm me

Could be a joke, but the fact she corrected herself immediately afterwards, makes it look a lot more like a slip to me.

In post 1375, Eve wrote:huh alright then

i didn't realise Battle Mage was the one who "caught" Zantetsu

VOTE: Norwee

i'll check Riabi tonight

Don't believe Eve did not know what happened with Zantetsu by this point, despite having claimed to be embarrassed at protecting him the previous day.

In post 1388, Eve wrote:idk i'll probably sheep whatever Luca does but yeah your vote seemed a little opportunistic

claiming you are sheeping is always scummy.

- Scum Neighbouriser

Right sorted,

oh no this is really bad for me right now whatever will i do

but seriously like i said lynch riabi tomorrow

Looker and Riabi, please vote Eve so we can finish this.

I'm comfortable with that. I'll admit, I noticed her 1344 and thought it might be a scumslip, but, I wanted to see other reactions to it.

VOTE: Eve.

In post 1408, Eve wrote:but but that was a joke Luca...

it's okay i survived one day phase without being lynched which is all i was aiming for really

I wish there was more context to this - you make it sound like scum that's given up.

In post 1416, Riabi wrote:I'm comfortable with that. I'll admit, I noticed her 1344 and thought it might be a scumslip, but, I wanted to see other reactions to it.

VOTE: Eve.

What would be the point of reaction-testing if she doesn't have any partners?

• @Battle Mage: You being PT Cop is why I'm not excluding scum neighborizer. And also, I assume a single-man PT still counts as a PT?

VOTE: Eve

In post 1417, Looker wrote:

---

• @Battle Mage: You being PT Cop is why I'm not excluding scum neighborizer. And also, I assume a single-man PT still counts as a PT?

Yes that's exactly my thought. Town neighbouriser feels less likely mechanics-wise, and when you add up Anotora and Eve posting, I'm pretty happy with the lynch today.

I don't know about single-man PT, won't really matter now but I can ask the Mod.

it doesn't make any sense for me to be scum neighbouriser with a town PT cop because then 2 out of 3 scum are effectively godfathers to the PT cop which sounds like iffy balance

you guys probably should've thought about that

Okapoka the Magnificent has replaced Egix96.
Bitmap the Meme Lord has replaced NorweiganboyEE.

They are both extremely appreciated and are worthy of the title of Employee of the Month

Night Ends In (expired on 2020-04-24 23:00:00)

In retrospect, lynching Eve today probably was dumb given the mechanics we already know (probably 1 scum left, with roleblocker). I got no result again last night.

Going back to the Zant-Iso, it has to be Riabi right?

Luca pretty much confirmed, 2 scum neighbours together feels a bit bastardised.

Looker confirmed as non-power-role, so must be town if there are 3 scum.