Mafiascum.net

In post 1398, clidd wrote:I believe I know how to recognize when the player reaches the limit and ends up "exploding" and asks for substitution. It happened to me once.

Seems kind of early in response to mere skepticism.

It looks like he'll get replaced regardless. Can't take it back.

That's a shame. I'll have to torment a replacement for answers.

Hectic wrote:Do you think this is one of those times, clidd?

Yes, very likely. But at the moment it is more plausible to wait for a replacement to enter the slot and restart the claim subject, so we can better evaluate the slot outside of this AtE spectrum to facilitate the general understanding of whether it is town or not.

In post 1400, Wake1 wrote: Seems kind of early in response to mere skepticism.

No, it didn't start today. Probably something had been bothering him since D1, until it became a snowball and probably exploded when you touched on the subject of his claim. Players react differently to stress. This, of course, is that I am not considering external factors. But it is merely speculation, so it is better to consider NAI for now.

Fair assessment. But there were indications he was getting increasingly frustrated from moments from yesterday as well.

Anyway, Gamma disappearing to post elsewhere on-site rather than claim is a hum de dum.

Hectic wrote:Fair assessment. But there were indications he was getting increasingly frustrated from moments from yesterday as well.

Anyway, Gamma disappearing to post elsewhere on-site rather than claim is a hum de dum.

Yeah, you're right.

I have the feeling that Gamma will claim VT in both alignments.

Dave always rages

Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher

Baloney

In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.

VOTE: wake88

In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher

Baloney

In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.

VOTE: wake88

OK but you're wrong though.

In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher

Baloney

In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.

VOTE: wake88

Migth of been me but i said it coild mean 3 things. One was that but also that one of the claims is fake


I just cant see scum not trying to get rid of dave or wake if they could. If scum have rb ability left. Waka or dave would have died. If they just have utility role then it asks the question how would they deal with dave/waka

im VT

In post 1411, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher

Baloney

In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.

VOTE: wake88

Migth of been me but i said it coild mean 3 things. One was that but also that one of the claims is fake


I just cant see scum not trying to get rid of dave or wake if they could. If scum have rb ability left. Waka or dave would have died. If they just have utility role then it asks the question how would they deal with dave/waka

either way needs to be dealt with asap

There is a logic to say if we believe Dave and mislynch him on purpose, we reduce the collateral damage and if he was lying, we hit scum.

That's a thought, but I prefer my theory of {Wake Hectic} being the scum team

In post 1414, profii wrote:There is a logic to say if we believe Dave and mislynch him on purpose, we reduce the collateral damage and if he was lying, we hit scum.

Without having read anything else or knowing what this refers to, I believe this statement to be true.

I requested immediate access to a PT prior to replacing in, and have been granted one. I will be rereading the game and tracking my thoughts in there. Given the size of the game I don't feel that a stream-of-consciousness catch-up is appropriate. I acknowledge the value of immediately answering questions referencing some things my old slot may have done (many mafia have been caught by not knowing they replaced a player whom fake claimed, etc.), so I will be keeping an eye on the end of the thread while catching up.

In post 1382, davesaz wrote:Gamma crumbed PGO.

Well Dave read my crumb right, kinda. I’m an Ascetic Townie.

Is Bob the same person as AskBob?

Also UNVOTE: because I think Babysitter actually works with the rest of the claimed roles (I’m assuming we kept the order FYI)

^ I take the above post to mean that my old self has claimed.

In post 1404, Hectic wrote:Fair assessment. But there were indications he was getting increasingly frustrated from moments from yesterday as well.

Anyway, Gamma disappearing to post elsewhere on-site rather than claim is a hum de dum.

I can’t believe you’d think this given game I was posting in.

For the rest of you, it’s a game we’re both in and I’ll leave it at that.

In post 1421, LuckyLuciano wrote:^ I take the above post to mean that my old self has claimed.

Yes

Though not your N2 target

Was the N2 kill blocked?