Page 57 of 78

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:10 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1399, notscience wrote:
In post 1242, notscience wrote:Town
Hoops
Agar
Cooldog
Gyp
Nippyflips
Klick
Bob

I don’t wanna Lynch any of these people
Post after added una and gobbles

What do you think klick
that is not pro-town. Also I've just realised today Klick is scum, so appealing to him/her isn't your greatest hit.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:12 am
by PranaDevil
In post 1382, bob3141 wrote:9/10 the doc always protects zippy.

And as klict said. scum would need something to balance. And most options end with a town watcher being killed. As the most likely one is strongman
Nobody targeted Flippy. So there was no doctor going in that direction at all.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:14 am
by notscience
How the fuck is going over my reads with another player not protown

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:15 am
by notscience
VOTE: battle mage

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:15 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1401, PranaDevil wrote:
In post 1382, bob3141 wrote:9/10 the doc always protects zippy.

And as klict said. scum would need something to balance. And most options end with a town watcher being killed. As the most likely one is strongman
Nobody targeted Flippy. So there was no doctor going in that direction at all.
But I think we're in agreement that the doctor wouldn't have gone for Nipples anyway

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:16 am
by bob3141
So battle are you saying that your claiming doc?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:17 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1402, notscience wrote:How the fuck is going over my reads with another player not protown
In post 1403, notscience wrote:VOTE: battle mage
LOL, oversensitive much? :lol:

A huge list of players you think are town, some of whom are probably not, is completely useless and just distracts from us trying to actually lynch scum today.

Are you going to stop this posturing and vote Gypyx with me or what?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:18 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1405, bob3141 wrote:So battle are you saying that your claiming doc?
:wink: :wink: :wink:

erm.......No. I already accidentally claimed bulletproof I think, a Bulletproof doc seems slightly too powerful. :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:23 am
by Battle Mage
Maybe I'm a bulletproof 2-shot vigilante

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:23 am
by notscience
I’m not posturing and gyp is a shit vote.

Don’t worry about how my reads manifest themselves.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:25 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1409, notscience wrote:I’m not posturing and gyp is a shit vote.

Don’t worry about how my reads manifest themselves.
I will always worry about how scum play. It's my job. Gyp is a solid vote as Gyp is scum. You are scum for defending them. :cop:

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:26 am
by Battle Mage
I'll probably vig you tonight anyway

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:27 am
by Battle Mage
if you flip town, ill be sure to look at your townlist tomorrow

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:27 am
by notscience
I’m not the one voting town /shrug

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:27 am
by notscience
So your stance is that I, scum, am appealing to change the read of my partner, klick, who is also scum

Okay

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:29 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1414, notscience wrote:So your stance is that I, scum, am appealing to change the read of my partner, klick, who is also scum

Okay
i didnt say you were appealing to change their read, and neither did you

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:30 am
by notscience
When what exactly am I appealing to do

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:31 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1413, notscience wrote:I’m not the one voting town /shrug
shrug all you want, unless you got some good fucking evidence of that, i dont buy it.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:33 am
by bob3141
Battle if your not a doc. Then why are you keep trying to claim that a doc would protect prana. When most players infact scum read prana. Thus most docs woudlnt protect prana as they would simply think it woudl be waste.

Thus scum would know this. So a doc never stops the kill unless prana is scum.

looks to me your just trying to shade the meaning of any roleblockers action.



The roleblocker has certainly found a guilty.


And even if prana is a town watcher. Its still best play for the roleblocker to claim who they blocked and we lynch them.

If prana is town. scum have to kill the watcher to get at the rb.


If prana is scum then he has to fake a guilty. 2 scum down for 1 mislynch. and the usual nightkills

leavign us with one mislynch left and still have the chance a rb stops a second night kill

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:35 am
by notscience
Let’s stop stressing the prs atm and start lynching scummage

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:36 am
by Battle Mage
Bob, I've explained logically why you're wrong. I'm not claiming doc, and I don't care to speculate about a potential roleblocker. dont know what your game is here.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:37 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1419, notscience wrote:Let’s stop stressing the prs atm and start lynching scummage
maybe you can decide the lynch today as you're dead tonight :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:40 am
by bob3141
In post 1420, Battle Mage wrote:Bob, I've explained logically why you're wrong. I'm not claiming doc, and I don't care to speculate about a potential roleblocker. dont know what your game is here.

Explain no kill then if your not a doc then?

Who did scum try to kill and why would the doc protect them.


In this game a doc means a a scum prana.

And the nigth kill was almsot certainly stopped by a roleblocker.

rb also has higher odds of stopping a kill than doc.



Explain why prana wouldnt of been killed. When the odds are almost no player in this game would protect him

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:41 am
by bob3141
If a game had watcher and doc. Prana woudl still of died as to balance scum would need a strongman

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:42 am
by Battle Mage
dude, ive explained this already. if there's a doc, they would have protected prana. that is obvious. doc has higher odds of stopping an NK than rb when the target is highly predictable.

I don't know how you've managed to get this so wrong.