Mafiascum.net

You can target me or Banana and either of us can confirm your claim norwe.

In post 1396, androgybee wrote:we're not an IC.

we're a suicidal role.

So when you said earlier you could: "confirm your role" you meant you just die?

considering we're in evens rn, there's an argument to be made for us triggering today. though it's not unlikely we'll have more multikill nights via the corruption mechanic.

BananaCucho wrote:Also, if you could please share what you have learned from this 2nd gambit?

ill tell you after ive learned it!

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1396, androgybee wrote:we're not an IC.

we're a suicidal role.

So when you said earlier you could: "confirm your role" you meant you just die?

basically. technically, the mod will confirm us as town....

when we trigger our ability, we target someone and cure them of all corruption and make them permanently immune to gaining corruption.

wanna be voteless forever, banana?
~nahdia

In post 1403, androgybee wrote:when we trigger our ability, we target someone and cure them of all corruption and make them permanently immune to gaining corruption.

wanna be voteless forever, banana?
~nahdia

What's your role name?

Also this role sounds terrible lol. If you targeted me, I could just extend the game 24 hours over and over again and make it never end

We would be playing 20 years from now still. Well, probably just me

That would have been a nice combo with the saintass.

Lol, maybe we can force a draw if we miseliminate today banana.

You can be a treestump forever Banana. What a deal!

What's the name of your role Androgybee?

In post 1405, Bell wrote:That would have been a nice combo with the saintass.

It's technically a good combo with you too, you could just target yourself over and over and the fruit doesn't harm anyone else

uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names? or are you just curious?

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names? or are you just curious?

Name please.

In post 1408, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1405, Bell wrote:That would have been a nice combo with the saintass.

It's technically a good combo with you too, you could just target yourself over and over and the fruit doesn't harm anyone else

So fundamentally broken setup or is someone lying about their role? Which is more likely?

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names?

Yes. There most definitely is.

In post 1410, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names? or are you just curious?

Name please.

refer to my earlier question.

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names?

Yes. There most definitely is.

do tell.

In post 1413, androgybee wrote:

In post 1410, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names? or are you just curious?

Name please.

refer to my earlier question.

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1409, androgybee wrote:uh, is there some reason to be claiming role names?

Yes. There most definitely is.

do tell.

Is there a reason NOT to claim the role name? It's just flavor

Please share.

It depends if mafia die from corruption/if they have elevated thresholds for corruption. I half suspected I was a negative utility role.

In post 1411, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1408, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1405, Bell wrote:That would have been a nice combo with the saintass.

It's technically a good combo with you too, you could just target yourself over and over and the fruit doesn't harm anyone else

So fundamentally broken setup or is someone lying about their role? Which is more likely?

They likely need to suicide if legit, I don't think that we can let a claim like this live tbh

If a name sounds fake or unlikely to be a part of the setup it can prove it was made up or changed from it's original name. (Which is scum indicative)

i refuse.

if it's relevant mechanically, it's a scum ability designed to punish fullclaims.

Kinda bothersome that Bee won't just claim the name tbh

In post 1418, androgybee wrote:i refuse.

VOTE: Androgybee

In post 1418, androgybee wrote:i refuse.

if it's relevant mechanically, it's a scum ability designed to punish fullclaims.

Who are you going to use your suicide to purify?

Can these set ups even have punishment for full claims?

we'll suicide anyway and you'll learn the name then. before then i consider your harping on a flavor detail suspicious. anyone could come up with a fake flavor name.

BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1418, androgybee wrote:i refuse.

if it's relevant mechanically, it's a scum ability designed to punish fullclaims.

Who are you going to use your suicide to purify?

not sure. who would you recommend?

Bell wrote:Can these set ups even have punishment for full claims?

uh, absolutely.

- Norwee (Decrease corruption by 1)
- Bell (increase corruption by 1 with loud modifier)
- Banana (Self-harm 1 corruption to increase day time by 24 hours, Can't place votes at 0 corruption.)
() S_S - (Mod confirmed role, Jack of all trades)
androgybee (Self-destructing purification role thing...?)

- VT
() - VT
() - VT

Not claimed:
- Dumb and Dumber
- redtea
- catboi
- starbuck
- Porkens