Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:02 am
Yeah, if you (cephrir) do have anything it might be an idea to say it.
Last I checked, "I don't have anything concrete" means "I don't have anything concrete". I don't see why this is so difficult to understand.christiano drago wrote:Means you think you have something - but you're hesitant to post it because it's easily discreditable.Cephrir wrote:I have to contribute here is that CD is constantly rubbing me the wrong way even though I don't have anything concrete.
Either that was just a case of mistaken phraseology [which, personally, I don't believe in], or you're weary of making a case that looks weak because it will put you in the spotlight.
Well, if you're going to deny it:Cephrir wrote:And I'm pretty sure I didn't do what you just said in your last sentence.
Oct 20. Emphasis yours.Cephrir wrote:I have to say, given ABR's forgetting his role,andhis somewhat difficult to believe target (although I can think of a reason to track cd),he's likely scum.
Cephrir wrote:I'm not sure CML is the right lynch, but I suppose it's better to lose a townie than a potential tracker and yes, I would still say there's a substantial chance ABR is not lying.
Both from the same Oct 21 post. It's unclear what would have changed your mind, and, given that youCephrir wrote:I'm not sure if CML's repeated insistance that there's no case on him indicates frustrated townie or frustrated scum. I know I have reacted that way as both.
That entire post was made from the viewpoint of Armlx, in that if Armlx had been lynched, found out to be town, and thus a mislynch, then we'd know x amount of detail from, which I then went into listing, still from that same viewpoint of "if a happens, then b".MrBuddyLee wrote:GhostWriter: "For him to getmoremislynches, you'd have to be the one to randomly have been guessed right. On top of that, you'd have to be aligned with Shinra upon death. The point that I am making is that hewill notgetothermislynches out of this. The only way for him to even stay alive after your death is if you are not only scum, but specifically Shinra."
Note Ghostwriter:
* says "more" mislynches meaning he knows armlx is a mislynch
* says "randomly guessed right" implying he knows xtosm is guessing
* seems to know armlx won't come up Shinra
Note that if armlx does come up Shinra, xtoxm can get more "mislynches". But GhostWriter expresses absolute certainty that xtoxm "will not" get more mislynches.GW = probable Shinra
Considering we were all (mostly) sure of there easily being able to have 2 scum groups from the way the game is setup, I saw no point to ever doubt that there were anything less. Add onto that my philosophy of most large games having a setup of 2 mafia groups and at least one other night killing role (SK, vig, JOAT, doesn't matter which) but most likely 2 other night killing role, and you have me doing nothing more than spouting what I believe to be common sense. On top of that, since when have mafia groups been told "Hey guys, you'll only have one of multiple cops looking for you!"? If it's ever been done that way, I've never seen it.MrBuddyLee wrote:Ghostwriter looks really bad here for his approach towards xtoxm. he knew early that a cop would be looking for one specific scumteam.
As in, it sounded like Zak was saying that Rice told Zak to do better with keeping active, as not to look scummy, and Zak is doing that now.Cephrir wrote:Coaching? That doesn't even make sense.GhostWriter wrote:It wasn't just you. It sounded like admitted coaching to me.Jebus wrote:And was it just me, or did the first half come over as scummy?
Right, 'kay. Sorta misread that.GhostWriter wrote:As in, it sounded like Zak was saying that Rice told Zak to do better with keeping active, as not to look scummy, and Zak is doing that now.Cephrir wrote:Coaching? That doesn't even make sense.GhostWriter wrote:It wasn't just you. It sounded like admitted coaching to me.Jebus wrote:And was it just me, or did the first half come over as scummy?
Hm. Guess I did say that. Well, I'd been pretty much leaning towards believing ABR all day. I think what made up my mind was that a scum wasn't more likely to screw up that badly than town. You'll notice my first reaction upon seeing that Tony wasn't going to happen was to vote CML. Also: mentioning someone in a post isn't the same as thinking they're the most suspicious. Voting usually is.CarnCarn wrote:Well, if you're going to deny it:Cephrir wrote:And I'm pretty sure I didn't do what you just said in your last sentence.Oct 20. Emphasis yours.Cephrir wrote:I have to say, given ABR's forgetting his role,andhis somewhat difficult to believe target (although I can think of a reason to track cd),he's likely scum.
Cephrir wrote:I'm not sure CML is the right lynch, but I suppose it's better to lose a townie than a potential tracker and yes, I would still say there's a substantial chance ABR is not lying.Both from the same Oct 21 post. It's unclear what would have changed your mind, and, given that youCephrir wrote:I'm not sure if CML's repeated insistance that there's no case on him indicates frustrated townie or frustrated scum. I know I have reacted that way as both.sounda lot more convinced ABR was scum than CML, it's a bit surprising you still put your vote on CML. I just remembered this and it struck me as a parallel to your mentioning of Jebus and vote for Zak.
Since when?GhostWriter wrote:Add onto that my philosophy of most large games having a setup of 2 mafia groups
MrBuddyLee wrote: Yosarian on xtoxm: "I'm like 95% sure is not just a fake claim, but possibly the worst fake claim I've ever seen?" and votes xtoxm.Very possible Shinrawho knows xtoxm is lying. Is Yos really this sloppy?
Ah...forgot he claimed Shinra cop. Ok, makes sense now.MrBuddyLee wrote:Shinra knew immediately that xtoxm was lying about armlx being Shinra. That's why I went back and read the game from the perspective of a Shinra.
Well, if you'd really rather me answer that then him, I don't think it's as strong as you do and that you're quoting him out of context.Yos, what do you think of GhostWriter's actions after xtoxm claimed armlx was Shinra?
Since I played a few large games, on this site, and on others, and discovered it to be a common trait. I then looked at other large games in the past. The majority, themed or not, have that 2 mafia/1-2 alternate night kill rule. Therefore, I've begun using that as my basic ideology of how games are setup when I enter them, unless explicitly told different.Cephrir wrote:Since when?GhostWriter wrote:Add onto that my philosophy of most large games having a setup of 2 mafia groups
I think it's weird that you don't realize he's already responded 5 posts above yours. Why are you hesitant to talk about GhostWriter? How specifically did I quote him out of context?Yosarian2 wrote:Well, if you'd really rather me answer that then him, I don't think it's as strong as you do and that you're quoting him out of context.
I'm hesitant to defend him, sure, because I don't feel like I have a good read on his alignment and because he hasn't really done anything strongly pro-town this game, I don't like to defend people I'm not confident on. But since you asked me, I'll answer your question.MrBuddyLee wrote:
I think it's weird that you don't realize he's already responded 5 posts above yours. Why are you hesitant to talk about GhostWriter? How specifically did I quote him out of context?
Once you see that, it becomes clear that:Ghostwriter wrote:armlx wrote:EBWODP: Everyone also has to realize that if xtoxm didn't claim day cop here, he was going to be lynched. This way he gets to mise a mislynch out of it if people listen, possibly more if he randomly guess right.
For him to get more mislynches, you'd have to be the one to randomly have been guessed right. On top of that, you'd have to be aligned with Shinra upon death. Anything else, and he dies. No if's, and's, or but's about it.
The "more mislynch" thing is pretty clearly just a response to Armlx saying "a mislynch, possibly more".MrBuddyLee wrote: Note Ghostwriter:
* says "more" mislynches meaning he knows armlx is a mislynch
* says "randomly guessed right" implying he knows xtosm is guessing
This, I don't see at ll, if you read it in context.* seems to know armlx won't come up Shinra
Actually, that was almost a direct quote of what Armlx said. Again, you're not reading it in context. It seems like you're trying to take a bunch of things to be scum freudian slips, when in context they're mostly just him quoting Armlx in order to refute what Armlx was saying.Note that if armlx does come up Shinra, xtoxm can get more "mislynches".
You going to actualy make a case for that, or are you just going to follow all the MBF arguments without even saying anything about the defense I gave to them?iamausername wrote:
Yos = Shinra is right on the money though, IMO.
Are you a "He wanted him lynched. It must be a bus." kind of guy?iamausername wrote:Yeah, I'm going to have to agree with Yos on this one, the GW case is weaksauce when you take his post in context.
And I don't see why Empking wanting to test Xtoxm's claim makes him specifically Shinra; Turks would benefit just as much from doing so, as far as I can see, and given his actions with regard to CML yesterday, that's what I'm thinking Empking is.
Also don't think TonyMontana is Shinra after his claim. Maybe this is stepping into dangerous outguessing the mod territory, but if Cloud is a safeclaim, I'd imagine it would be for SK Sephiroth.
Yos = Shinra is right on the money though, IMO.
No.Yosarian2 wrote:You going to actualy make a case for that, or are you just going to follow all the MBF arguments without even saying anything about the defense I gave to them?
No.Empking wrote: Are you a "He wanted him lynched. It must be a bus." kind of guy?