Mafiascum.net

TIP doesn't make any sense bottom of page 53 through top of page 54.

In post 1344, RadiantCowbells wrote:There's a big leaning town one though: laziness.

There's 0 town-motivation in being lazy.

In post 1355, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:it's not about the votes I have

I have been lynched while being much happier about a game than I am now

Look at the top two wagons. Neither make a lick of sense.

Nobody in this town is willing to see anything logical

We have 5 lurkers and nothing is being done about them

This is how any reasonable person should feel about this game.

In post 1358, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:3. Sakura Hana: can somebody TELL ME why I'm wrong on this read it's driving me nuts

Did you ever respond to my Sakura ISO?

wtf that RC wagon.

In post 1373, TheIrishPope wrote:Not policy, utility

Why are you fixated on trying to create a distinction that doesn't exist?

In post 1380, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have a strong scumread on Frat Br0s.

I have a mild townread on TIP.

I have a mild townread on Likeabauss.

Reasons are hard, let's spew random things and hope people just nod their heads and ignore my lack of engagement with the game.

In post 1384, likeabauss wrote:C'mon people. FratBros or Orcinus. I'm literally begging for votes, so confident I'll do the 1 v 1 thing, and consistently laying out more and more reasons why these two are scum. Their responses are "UR Shitlord" and or "BS prove it." I mean, is this an acceptable defense in anybody's mind? You dont have to buy into my psychobabble to see that something is seriously wrong with their play.

1) Shitty AtE to get lurkers to vote with him.
2) You're definition of "laying out more reasons" is "misrepping everything they do to make them look scummy." That then gets followed by misrepping the next point when I point out that you've made another misrep.
3) You're right, you don't have to buy into psychobabble, you have to buy into NOT BELIEVING IN FUCKING LOGIC.

In post 1387, RadiantCowbells wrote:In support of Bauss, FratBros doesn't look angry.

He looks like he's making a show of being angry, without any genuine anger behind it, hence my vote.

You're blacklisted if you're scum. You don't get to discredit my emotions you asshat.

In post 1396, RadiantCowbells wrote:Does anyone else not see that FratBros being this hard to lynch makes him obvious scum?

...Or means that scum burned too much towncred pushing the wagon and realized that they can't get their mislynch through.

I like that caled came back with a read-list that isn't just moving with the flow of the game. Guyett raises a good point about the meta-read on him, though. I want to hear caled's response to that. Also, I don't like how when asked about her reads on orc/bauss, she only substantiates the bauss read.

...and Hermy continues to provide no content. Joy.

In post 1424, Toomai wrote:

In post 1422, likeabauss wrote:Anybody notice anything strange about Orcinus's reads list?

You mean this post where 5 names are missing? I didn't think that was a reads list more than a complaints list.

You get +10 to my opinion of your intelligence.

bauss gets +10 to misrepping. Again.

I do not see any scum-motivation behind the push on AFB and orc by bauss

Bauss does not gain much by investing in this act

the WORST case scenario assuming that bauss is wrong is the cost of 2 mislynches. However, in this worst scenario, there will be enough information gathered through the duration of the lynches to deduce who is scum

RC's lynch will get us nowhere, as I don't see anything valuable will result from it. RC is more suitable to get vig'ed instead.

@TIP if you could lynch two people today, who would they be?

In post 1428, JacobSavage wrote:@TIP if you could lynch two people today, who would they be?

That's a good question. How would you answer it?

In post 1429, sangres wrote:

In post 1428, JacobSavage wrote:@TIP if you could lynch two people today, who would they be?

That's a good question. How would you answer it?

Hell, if you could lynch person today, who would it be?

In post 1430, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1429, sangres wrote:

In post 1428, JacobSavage wrote:@TIP if you could lynch two people today, who would they be?

That's a good question. How would you answer it?

Hell, if you could lynch

one

person today, who would it be?

Do you think RC is scum?

Alas, I do not.

why is RC a better lynch; it's not

i enjoy your use of the semicolon

I'm busy for a few days but I'm reading, just posting light

VOTE: Orcinus

I just can't read anymore of the crap coming from him and FratBoys. Its not even mediocre scum play, it just makes me sad.

MC Maraca, I'll respond when Cabd responds to me. Pretty sure I asked him some questions first.

Cephrir, did I miss a response from you? And why is your vote on somebody that you don't think is scum? Did I read that right?

And in case a miracle happens and I wake up to find Orcinus lynched:
Scum = FratBoys, MC Maraca
They'll both be near impossible to hang with their teammates holding votes (as evidenced by today.) So an overnight kill would be ideal.

VOTE: orcinus_theoriginal

L-2

In post 1362, sangres wrote:I have never seen you like this in a game. :/

I was wrong. I have seen you like this in a game.

Sort of, anyway.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=28645

Let's talk about Buzzword Bingo.

jake's about 5 years old

I'm very busy but I will try to make a post otnight

Can I get a summarized version of the case on me

In post 1426, yessiree wrote:I do not see any scum-motivation behind the push on AFB and orc by bauss

Bauss does not gain much by investing in this act

the WORST case scenario assuming that bauss is wrong is the cost of 2 mislynches. However, in this worst scenario, there will be enough information gathered through the duration of the lynches to deduce who is scum

Look at all those townreads he's getting for this bullshit. There's your motivation.

In post 1435, likeabauss wrote:I just can't read anymore of the crap coming from him and FratBoys. Its not even mediocre scum play, it just makes me sad.

"OH EM GEE, I CAN'T JUST KEEP MISREPPING SHIT AND HOPING PEOPLE WILL JOIN ME, SO I'M JUST GOING TO ATE"

In post 1440, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:jake's about 5 years old

I'm very busy but I will try to make a post otnight

Can I get a summarized version of the case on me

I've been waiting to see something similar to your reaction and fight-back in the Borkgame when Majiffy misrepped you about setting up mislynches and tunneled the shit out of you on day 1. You engaged the argument and you raged and it went on and on and on.

Your reaction here has basically been all about personalities and not so much about substance. Though admittedly bauss' argument initially was about your predecessor which didn't give you a lot of substance to argue.

This is a lot more like your argument with Jake.

Policy is way different than utility
Policy is to lynch Vengeful claims or such
Utility is to lynch players that detriment the game

If I would lynch two people today...
Probably Guyett, because this reminds me of his town game (sarcasm)
And orcinus is just AtE'ing all the way, I don't know why AP and BRO don't see that.

In post 1441, Angry Frat BROs wrote:

In post 1426, yessiree wrote:I do not see any scum-motivation behind the push on AFB and orc by bauss

Bauss does not gain much by investing in this act

the WORST case scenario assuming that bauss is wrong is the cost of 2 mislynches. However, in this worst scenario, there will be enough information gathered through the duration of the lynches to deduce who is scum

Look at all those townreads he's getting for this bullshit. There's your motivation.

It's not bullshit. And even if it is, I'm buying it for now in this game of bullshit.

There is no case on me and I'm getting scumread for freaking out when I

In post 1435, likeabauss wrote: I just can't read anymore of the crap coming from him and FratBoys. Its not even mediocre scum play, it just makes me sad.

I am really tempted to vote you for this.

In post 1435, likeabauss wrote:Cephrir, did I miss a response from you? And why is your vote on somebody that you don't think is scum? Did I read that right?

Did you ask me a question?

You did. I was searching for a counterwagon, and one appeared on a null read, so I went for it. I'm leaning a little more town on him though and starting to accept that orc may not be town. He's not living up to what I expect of him. I did come in with a strong meta read right after he was doing what I expected, but then he stopped. I would like to suggest that orc simply claim now at L-2 rather than allowing for possible derphammers.

In post 1438, sangres wrote:Sort of, anyway.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=28645

!!!