Page 58 of 287
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:48 am
by beeboy
@podo what makes you say that?
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:51 am
by beeboy
↑ Tammy wrote:This whole argument with mirhawk being scum because he knew ami was lying is like wtf are you people serious.
Does anyone have anything better than this for reading him as scum because like really people?
I'm actually really serious. Those who want to lynch him, can you tell me why he's scum without referencing the miller thing? Please and thank you.
You might be town since you are the only one so far who is on the same page as me, thank you!
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:53 am
by davesaz
My position on those listed by beeboy above:
Tammy - Stale read and the posting gap will throw me off a bit, but she was town the last I remember
Seniors - TBH I never looked closely given so many people were "on the case" so needs review. Did not have a specific town read here
Ranger - see my previous post
Cakez - stale read, thought he looked pretty town early but didn't disagree when someone pointed out it seemed shallow
Tictac - can't remember the last thing he posted, probable active lurker type scum
Sakura - Don't remember anything that I thought was scummy, think she's a town read but haven't been thinking about it much
TWL - Would need to refresh my memory, think I've seen both good and bad
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:54 am
by beeboy
@Tammy since you are here and I don't understand your position this game can you give a brief description on your read on me, seniors and ranger?
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:55 am
by Sakura Hana
Happy April's Fools ppl, I won't be around today sorry.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:56 am
by beeboy
↑ Sakura Hana wrote:Happy April's Fools ppl, I won't be around today sorry.
o/ can you answer the question I asked Tammy quickly plz ;-;
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:56 am
by Tammy
I am town! Aren't you lucky
I have some issues with the mirhawk thing that I'll talk about when I catch up.
Nope can't give that. I have you as probably town and that's about it. I'm about 20 pages behind, so you'll have to wait.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:57 am
by Sakura Hana
This one?
↑ beeboy wrote:@Tammy since you are here and I don't understand your position this game can you give a brief description on your read on me, seniors and ranger?
Town, Null-Scum, Null-Town
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:58 am
by Sakura Hana
Anyway sorry, dont have time, need to go now, cya
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:58 am
by podoboq
↑ Mirhawk wrote: ↑ podoboq wrote: ↑ Mirhawk wrote: ↑ podoboq wrote:It definitely depends on how they presented their argument for not lynching. In Mirhawk's case, there's a legitimate fear that it comes from knowledge town doesn't have. In that case, definitely not giving towncred. There's not a binary answer to this.
OMFG this is so stupid.
I don't care if you think I'm scum because my vote switch sounded fake or contrived.
But every person who thinks there was some kind of information scum would have that town wouldn't in this situation is talking out of their ass.
I think pistachion and Amihan are both town. Scum
knows
if pistachion and Amihan are both town.
When I see your response to the Miller garbage, I'm not saying that it looks to me like you know who the actual Miller is. I'm saying it looks like you know they're both town, and are stirring the pot making sure that one of the two of them comes out of it being scumread by town.
For reference:
↑ Mirhawk wrote:/lawls
Anyways, it seems the thing to do would be to String Pistachio.
Only thing is I'm a little worried about a scum counterclaim on Ami's part.
I mean what if Piss flips Miller? I don't see myself as being comfortable with either way we could go in that case.
↑ Mirhawk wrote:Unvote
Vote: Pistachio
Eh, what the hell.
Ah, that's fine actually.
I thought this was more of that business where I knew it was a gambit because I'm scum.
NOTE: Mirhawk's original post was not actually quoting mine, but I wanted to share the two in context with one another since it was in reply anyway.
I'll be honest, I started to townread Mirhawk after this. He saw a flaw in logic, was calling people on it, and then when I explained my logic, and he didn't see a flaw in it, he conceded that I had a fair argument. I don't see town bending like that.
I don't like his position on Ranger (or at least didn't like it), but I'm still holding out the possibility that he's town. FS, on the other hand, I'm basically sold on.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:00 am
by beeboy
@Tammy Ok, I want it once you catch up though because if I can understand your reads and progression I can verify you are town!
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:00 am
by podoboq
↑ beeboy wrote:@podo what makes you say that?
Can you clarify what you're asking about, specifically? Like, quote the specific thing?
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:01 am
by davesaz
↑ Tammy wrote:This whole argument with mirhawk being scum because he knew ami was lying is like wtf are you people serious.
Does anyone have anything better than this for reading him as scum because like really people?
I'm actually really serious. Those who want to lynch him, can you tell me why he's scum without referencing the miller thing? Please and thank you.
I was scum reading Mirhawk and had voted him before the miller thing because he was pushing on me for my early questioning. It felt like scum trying to look like scumhunting while staying off the major wagons. Then his reaction to others pushing him on miller seemed pretty genuine, and I don't really like those knee-jerk "ooh, he knew too much so it's a scumslip" kind of cases. I'd be willing to compromise there as we get closer to deadline but have my doubts.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:02 am
by beeboy
↑ podoboq wrote: ↑ beeboy wrote:@podo what makes you say that?
Can you clarify what you're asking about, specifically? Like, quote the specific thing?
One of Seniors or Mirhawk must be scum is somewhere in your post
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:05 am
by davesaz
↑ podoboq wrote:So Ranger says we should decide between Mirhawk and FS today.
@Ranger: whose lynch and flip provides the most information for town? Is there another metric that we should use to determine who we lynch today?
How did Ranger suddenly become the town leader? This rates a
FOS
in my book.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:11 am
by podoboq
↑ beeboy wrote: ↑ podoboq wrote: ↑ beeboy wrote:@podo what makes you say that?
Can you clarify what you're asking about, specifically? Like, quote the specific thing?
One of Seniors or Mirhawk must be scum is somewhere in your post
Seniors and Mirhawk are town's highest scumreads, and frankly I think Seniors is obvscum. No longer sure about Mirhawk, but if I were to put odds on it, I think FS is 80%+ likely to be scum and Mirhawk is somewhere around 50/50.
The chances both coming up town with those odds are 1 in 10. I'm willing to take those odds. If my odds don't work for you, that's fine, but that's how I came to my conclusion.
Basically I'm saying that if Ranger is scum here, they aren't deflecting from our highest scum reads in order to get towncred (since she replaced into a suspicious slot). In that case, scum should choose the townie to kill if there is one. So we should lynch the other.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:12 am
by Friendless Seniors
Hi, I'll be VLA until Monday. I did not anticipate this, so I'm really sorry that it came up and especially sorry to hiplop. If anyone has urgent questions for this head, then please direct me to them as I'll be checking rather infrequently.
-EP
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:14 am
by podoboq
↑ davesaz wrote: ↑ podoboq wrote:So Ranger says we should decide between Mirhawk and FS today.
@Ranger: whose lynch and flip provides the most information for town? Is there another metric that we should use to determine who we lynch today?
How did Ranger suddenly become the town leader? This rates a
FOS
in my book.
Call it newbieness, but I townread the fuck out of her reads progression. It came off as stream of consciousness, with no barrier. It takes time to come up with lies that benefit scum, and frame your posts in ways that it's hard for town to pick at. Her post rate was too fast for her to fabricate everything, so I thought it was obvtown. Seeing so many people take problem with it, though, I've started to reconsider.
Reads list coming up. She's been knocked down a few pegs since the quoted post.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:17 am
by Tammy
Remind me to answer this when i've caught up.
pp wrote:
↑ Tammy wrote:Where were the few times you explained it? Pretty sure you answered and I responded. I haven't played much with Sakura either, but her wanting to sort nacho right away is standard. If you haven't played with someone I don't know why it would even spark your notice. Furthermore, you pointing out that nothing was out of the ordinary when he hadn't posted beyond a couple rvs posts feels off.
Right now my concern is that you are either scum with nacho and you did some early discrediting to stop someone from sorting him or you're scum trying to get on his good side.
I'm not really sure I understand what point you're making here.
It seems a simpler answer to me that Mala misremembered Sakura's early approach towards me in games (which was what her initial response to you was about); if we were scum together, I think that I probably would mention to her the people who I was expecting to be specifically trying to read me, and if she was trying to get on my good side, I don't really think that it would look like this?
Saying that I hadn't done anything out of the ordinary is equivalent to me not doing anything alignment indicative which means you two are saying exactly the same thing about my early posts unless I'm missing something big.
I'm liking Amihan's latest posts a lot for weird reasoning I can't quite articulate now, but I'll try again tomorrow.
No, it had nothing to do with you doing anything alignment non-indicative. Seeing that mala has people that she herself focuses on early game, it felt off that she attacked someone else for wanting to sort someone. Her attack on her in the way she did it didn't feel like it was used to sort Sakura at all (why would she, if she hasn't played with Sakura, think it's odd that she wanted to sort you anyway?) Then she stepped in the midst of Sakura's sort by telling her you hadn't done anything out of the ordinary. It just did not feel right.
Do you like amihan's posting because you want to give her a hug for being adorable? That's why I was town reading her.
pp wrote:
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:Hey Nacho,
thoughts on FS and Mirhawk and tammy please
~M
I'm not really sure on FS, but I'm leaning town there on the moment based on some of EP's posting.
Mirhawk seems scummy to me.
Tammy's town.
You got it so quickly! I was going to offer you
promises on Monday, but then the past couple times I appealed to you early game you ended up being scum and I didn't want to jinx it which I hope I'm not doing now. :/
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:18 am
by Skybird
↑ beeboy wrote:@Tammy since you are here and I don't understand your position this game can you give a brief description on your read on me, seniors and ranger?
I'm here too and can give you my thoughts.
You - Didn't like your push on FS at first. But after going over your ISO overall your other questions and activity look town to me.
FS - I don't like the amount of time they spent complaining about your (BBoy) push on them. I also don't like that they are scum-reading me off one post. They like Ami's case on me even though that consists of Ami not liking my questions and assigning a scum motivation to it. EP and Hippy have both played with me before so they know how I am D1 in a large. Their position on me feels a lot like a slot keeping their options open to be able to jump on a
lynchbait
wagon. Leaning scum here.
Ranger - feels town. Ranger just got in the game and spent some time reading and putting forth reads as she went along. The posts read as open and forthright to me. I want to see more as we go along but for now, I'm not interested in lynching Ranger today.
VOTE: Friendless Seniors
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:19 am
by podoboq
beeboy wanted reads on a few people, so I just decided I'd post a read on the whole town,
On a scale of 1-7 where 1 is obvscum and 7 is obvtown. X is a person (or hydra) who I basically have no read on either because I haven't paid enough attention to their walls, or I'm just completely torn.
Of note, I scumread prolonged inactivity, especially when paired with useless posts and prod dodges. Sorry 'bout you, Snarky. Also, hydras have been hard for me to get a read on.
Amihan - 7
pistachi0n - 7
beeboy - 6
SirCakez - 5
Tammy - 5
Axelrod - 5
Sakura Hana - 5
tictac* - 5
davesaz - 5
Mirhawk - 4
Spiffeh - 4
Ranger - 4
Skybird - 3
True Ogre - 3
Friendless Seniors (hiplop/Errantparabola) - 2
SnarkySnowman - 2
dramonic* - 1
The Pied Piper (Plotinus/nachomamma8) - ??
Cerberus v666 - ??
THE WRONG LYNCH (Malakittens/goodmorning) - ??
This was super on the cuff, and obviously, all subject to change.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:27 am
by beeboy
VOTE: seniors
Is swap this to ranger at any time.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:34 am
by Tammy
↑ SirCakez wrote: ↑ Spiffeh wrote: ↑ Axelrod wrote:The most active player is always going to get a favorable nod, and I liked his early enthusiasm.
Yuck
Wait wtf I missed this
This is a terrible town tell from Axel
Your scum tells backtrack, waffling and fencesit are calling.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:43 am
by Tammy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:First a catchup and then I'll do the plot thing
849: I don't see a problem with this progression but goddamn if you think that cakez, beeboy, and we are scum then you got another thing coming
oh damn cerb's in this game! hi cerb!
ok I'm glad that I can write spiffeh as town and accept that
Axel might be town for that readswall as well,
904.
But the whole "active players get towncred" is kinda wtf
Cerb you should interact with people about other things than mirhawk, yeah?
why aren't you doing that?
↑ Axelrod wrote:I will say I think the "EP" head sounds better than the "Hippy" head? At least, as best I can tell, I think most of the posts I don't like seem to be coming from that one, but that could just be the one head not being as good at being scum as the one head just being more Townie. And even the EP head appears to have defaulted to a "Sheep" vote behind another player, so that's not particularly great either.
OK NEVER MIND
WHAT THE FUCK DUDE YOU EXPECT US TO JUST PUSH RANDOM VANITY WAGONS ARE YOU KIDDING OF COURSE I'M GOING TO SHEEP SOMEONE IF THEY'RE SCUMMY HOW DID NO ONE ELSE CATCH THIS
And yeah if you actually wanted to evaluate your reads (as town would do) you wouldn't say "Hey, EP is better but that could be because EP is better as scum" you would say "Hey, how does hiplop play as scum? Is it usually like this?"
The fact that you didn't ask this question means that you're
1. Finding reasons to scum read us that aren't legit
2. Not actually evaluating these reasons because you don't CARE how legit your read is as long as they make your case look good
So yeah, take that previous townread and toss that one in the trash
also this is terrible
if you think someone is legitimately scum then you go for it, that's the best case scenario, not "lynching someone you kinda think is scum but hoping for that information"
this is a horrible reason to defend swordsworth and the accusations
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:I thought that explained it pretty solidly. You didn't?
I...guess?
I mean, maybe it's just a playstyle clash
I feel like no matter how many times ogre explains it you know
↑ davesaz wrote:Repeating question since I didn't see much response to it. I think Dramonic is scum flying under the radar, but I don't know if this is normal for him.
AGAIN
WHY DON'T YOU FIGURE IT OUT BEFORE SCUMREADING PEOPLE?
WHAT
↑ Axelrod wrote:I think it's notable how Dram pops back up the instant he gets a few votes on him.
oh my god
this can't be real
VOTE: Axelrod
dramonic is your vote on axel because if so good
-EP
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:48 am
by Tammy
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Someone talk to me so I don't have to do my homework
Please do your homework