In post 1423, petroleumjelly wrote:it is similarly likely that scum would hunt for a hints at a potential Vigilante, which your questions are skirting.
I disagree with this. Scum might vig-hunt in the PT but never out in the open. Instead they try to get the townies on board trying to chase their common SK enemy.
In post 13, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay so scum team is dragon, crazy and eggman. Thoughts?
So you think the scumteam in a 13-player game would be three people?
In post 267, Eggman wrote:I WAS looking for an answer there, although the intent seems to have not come across. Every mod can do things differently, as well, so I wouldn't know the exact ratio of a 13-player game, hence the question.
Would like to revisit this now. Eggman, were you of the opinion that a 13-player game would have a two-player scum team? Did you think there would be multiple scum teams?
I didn't know how many mafiosos would be in this game, since this is my first game of this size. While I was writing that post, I forgot about the 1:3 method, as well.
4.)
Eggman, could you summarize your case on Smithereens?
1. I didn't like his tone all throughout D1
2. Tunnels Creature and I while the rest of us go for a Crabman / atm lynch
3.
In post 766, Smithereens wrote:I don't pay attention to my posts Dragon, if you read on you'll see that's why I lean town on Rob. He doesn't do it either. However, someone is wrong on the internet and it's my destiny to correct them.
He later says that that's a towntell, as town should be making bold statements and not caring about contradictions. But from experience, contradictions do not a living townie make.
4. (To me, at least, it feels like) he talks about theory as much as, if not more than, the actual game
5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
6. Spends the entire day arguing on why we should NOT lynch Crabman, then flips his vote to Crabman at the end for the hell of it
Since DG replaced in, I'll remain suspicious of that slot, but I'll try that strategy of "finding a mafioso, then finding his buddy".
FoS: Dragon, Vote: MM4
I don't think there's an SK. It's more probable, to me, that there's a vig who felt slighted by Robb and killed him for that, but later found out he dun goofed.
Dragon of the West, your thoughts on Smithereens/DrippingGoofball?
2.)
Dragon of the West, why did you not attempt to chat with Robbnva during Night One? You went so far as to try to get his attention in the middle of Day One, and I would think you would have more to say after the crazycrabman lynch and flip.
3.)
Eggman, why did you vote for crazycrabman on Day One while offering up one of yourself and Creature on Day Two?
In post 1148, Eggman wrote:So, based on what I've seen of other people's opinions, it seems that you consider Creature to mutually be scum with either Crabman or me. VOTE: Crabman,
FoS: Smithereens (un-FoS Crabman)
I propose lynching Crabman today, seeing how he flips, and if he's town lynch me or Creature tomorrow.
Because I don't get the cases on Infinity and Dragon, which also (to me) seem a little OMGUS-y (didn't Infinity call out DotW in the first place?)
Based on your Day One posting your top scumread was Smithereens (and I see that is apparently still true based on your recent vote), so I don't understand why you would resort to a sort of 'gambit' offering like that.
4.)
Eggman, in explaining your case on Smithereens you said:
In post 1426, Eggman wrote:5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
Dragon of the West, your thoughts on Smithereens/DrippingGoofball?
2.)
Dragon of the West, why did you not attempt to chat with Robbnva during Night One? You went so far as to try to get his attention in the middle of Day One, and I would think you would have more to say after the crazycrabman lynch and flip.
3.)
Eggman, why did you vote for crazycrabman on Day One while offering up one of yourself and Creature on Day Two?
In post 1148, Eggman wrote:So, based on what I've seen of other people's opinions, it seems that you consider Creature to mutually be scum with either Crabman or me. VOTE: Crabman,
FoS: Smithereens (un-FoS Crabman)
I propose lynching Crabman today, seeing how he flips, and if he's town lynch me or Creature tomorrow.
Because I don't get the cases on Infinity and Dragon, which also (to me) seem a little OMGUS-y (didn't Infinity call out DotW in the first place?)
Based on your Day One posting your top scumread was Smithereens (and I see that is apparently still true based on your recent vote), so I don't understand why you would resort to a sort of 'gambit' offering like that.
4.)
Eggman, in explaining your case on Smithereens you said:
In post 1426, Eggman wrote:5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
Could you explain this?
If there is an SK, I think smithereens would be one of the top suspects for it. Now that he's replaced out, I'm going to keep that impression until DGB posts more content. I haven't seen much of substance since the replacement.
To answer your question about the neighborhood, it's because robb seemed disinterested in discussing anything with me after that first conversation. Also, I didn't feel comfortable with it just being robb and I. I was seriously concerned about a possible scum lurker hiding in the neighborhood getting info about our reads and using that to their advantage. I think Robb felt that way too if you read some of his thoughts on the neighborhood
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:42 pm
by Derek12
@DoTW
: What are you current thoughts on MM4 and Eggman?
Eggman, why did you vote for crazycrabman on Day One while offering up one of yourself and Creature on Day Two?
In post 1148, Eggman wrote:So, based on what I've seen of other people's opinions, it seems that you consider Creature to mutually be scum with either Crabman or me. VOTE: Crabman,
FoS: Smithereens (un-FoS Crabman)
I propose lynching Crabman today, seeing how he flips, and if he's town lynch me or Creature tomorrow.
Because I don't get the cases on Infinity and Dragon, which also (to me) seem a little OMGUS-y (didn't Infinity call out DotW in the first place?)
Based on your Day One posting your top scumread was Smithereens (and I see that is apparently still true based on your recent vote), so I don't understand why you would resort to a sort of 'gambit' offering like that.
because I felt that as a town we were stuck on me and Creature, I wanted to move us to Crabman and MM4, so we could come back to Creature and I the next day.
4.)
Eggman, in explaining your case on Smithereens you said:
In post 1426, Eggman wrote:5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
Could you explain this?
he puts smithereens first, especially saying "nothing here to note" when a few of us have noticed things there. To me it feels like a mafioso making an attempt to defend his buddy.
: What are you current thoughts on MM4 and Eggman?
MM4 was suspicious for me day one because of the way he was posting just enough not to get prodded. The posts he did make didn't feel like they were town AI so he still remains a scumlean. I'd like to see more from him today now that we've had a flip and two NK's. Depending on his play day 2, I could see him swinging either way.
Let me ISO Eggman and get back to you in a bit
After the ISO, I feel pretty comfortable with Eggman sitting as a town lean. After that early wagon on him I feel like his play has been town especially from the depth of his reads and attempts to find links. He's consistent with his suspicions and his thought process feels genuine