Page 58 of 103

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 3:58 pm
by BlackStar
You're acting like a spoiled kid who ain't getting his way, so it's making me not want to listen to you

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 3:58 pm
by Vedith
Anyone not buying the x shot - http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=66931

2 shot role cop
1 shot BP
JOAT - 2 shot tracker, 1 shot Doc
1 shot strongman

GTFO

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 3:59 pm
by BlackStar
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:00 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 1425, BlackStar wrote:You're acting like a spoiled kid who ain't getting his way, so it's making me not want to listen to you
zzz
In post 1426, Vedith wrote:Anyone not buying the x shot - http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=66931

2 shot role cop
1 shot BP
JOAT - 2 shot tracker, 1 shot Doc
1 shot strongman

GTFO
lmao

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:01 pm
by BlackStar
Zzzz

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:01 pm
by Dwlee99
zzzzz

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:02 pm
by BlackStar
Image

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:04 pm
by Dwlee99
if I finish all my chemistry work will u vote texcat

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:05 pm
by BlackStar
Okay

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:05 pm
by texcat
VT wouldn't really help you not get lynched though. And when you were, you haven't really done much to help your team. Claiming doc helps your team because it helps expose the doc. Add the x-shot in there to help you with any counter claim. Plus it explains why you weren't NK'd.

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:06 pm
by Dwlee99
okay, cool, brb
pedit no, it doesn't. At all. x-shot doesn't help with counterclaims. And it just adds more suspicion if you don't get night killed.
CHEM TIME

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:07 pm
by Transcend
Tex needs rope.

Also i might no save tonight in case scum decide to leave me alive. That way i still have 2 saves left if they leave me alive >:)

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:07 pm
by Vedith
In post 1434, texcat wrote:VT wouldn't really help you not get lynched though. And when you were, you haven't really done much to help your team. Claiming doc helps your team because it helps expose the doc. Add the x-shot in there to help you with any counter claim. Plus it explains why you weren't NK'd.
Why does it explain why they weren't killed?

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:08 pm
by Vedith
In post 1436, Transcend wrote:Tex needs rope.

Also i might no save tonight in case scum decide to leave me alive. That way i still have 2 saves left if they leave me alive >:)

Yeeeah, no.... If you're really town giving out information like this isn't needed.

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:18 pm
by Transcend
I won't give my motives. I may save, i may not. Only i know what I'll do and not scum.

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:19 pm
by Dwlee99
OKAY i'm done lynch texcat now black?

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:22 pm
by BlackStar
VOTE: texcat

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:23 pm
by Dwlee99
okay so that is 3 votes. 4 more :cool:

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:35 pm
by Dwlee99
I feel like whenever I catch scum the person I catch completely ignores me while bad posting while town derp around, don't read my case, and then call me scum or annoying

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 7:48 pm
by mhsmith0
Votecount 1.11
Xkfyu (4)
, , , ,
Transcend (3)
, , ,
algebra (1)
,
Mimikyu (1)
,
texcat (2)
, ,
dwlee99 (1)
,
Not Voting (1)
,


Xkfyu (2)
, ,
Transcend (3)
, , ,
algebra (1)
,
Mimikyu (1)
,
texcat (4)
, , , ,
dwlee99 (1)
,
Not Voting (1)
,


Mod spreadsheet error, 1.11 is now fixed.
Deadline is on Sunday, August 28th: (expired on 2016-08-28 08:00:00)

With 13 alive, it's 7 to lynch!
[/size]

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:47 pm
by Transcend
That vote count is horribly wrong.

Texcat needs more death.

However if this slot flips town, then Tier is scum for defending him for no reason.

RN I'm leaning Tex scum > Tier scum.

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 10:50 pm
by TierShift
Let me start of by saying that 1-shot BP and X-shot doc are both weak powerroles that could be in the setup together. There is no reason for them not to BUT both claims are really convenient.

It's hard/impossible to actually confirm the role plus the doc is too weak to be a prime NK target especially with the scumminess of the slot
In post 1375, Dwlee99 wrote:Voting trans but then deciding to fence sit is great. Also great how you suddenly start scum reading me when I begin to case you. :3
You have not posted anything resembling a case, fuck off
In post 1396, texcat wrote:
In post 1380, Vedith wrote:Okay
VOTE: Texcat

Texcat, talk about Dwlee to me.
Why do you think he's lying along with Zyf?
Dwlee didn't have much choice. Claims that can't be proven are suspect in my book, particularly x-shot ones that explain why they aren't NK.d. Transcend's claim is suspect because I believe it was designed to expose our doc.
I agree with this fwiw
In post 1418, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1416, texcat wrote:What exactly do you expect scum to claim?
THIS IS SCUM LYNCH HER
Go away it is a good question. You are not even reading texcat's posts.

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:35 am
by Dwlee99
In post 1446, TierShift wrote:You have not posted anything resembling a case, fuck off
what
WHAT
SRSLY WHAT????
Holy crap

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:37 am
by Dwlee99
In post 1369, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1364, texcat wrote:I don't believe the claim, but I didn't Zyf' s claim either. The 2 shot part of it is just too convenient.
Doubtcast - BUT (fence sitting like a boss) - MORE Doubtcast.
In post 1370, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1283, texcat wrote:
In post 1222, Dwlee99 wrote:Lowell
BlackStar
TierShift
algebra
gerryoat
Mimikyu
texcat
Saru
VOTE: Blackstar
Does this mean that you are town reading Xkyfu, Sonia, and Vedith?
*COUGHBADQUESTIONCOUGH*
In post 1371, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 20, texcat wrote:
In post 9, Zyf wrote:Has anyone else played with sonia/transcend in the same match
No, why? Is there something we should know?
In post 50, texcat wrote:
In post 30, Zyf wrote:
In post 29, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Hello I is n00b I just learned how to post on this site I have never won take it easy on me please as I don't know how this game works I am anime weeb desu desu

VOTE: Transcend fking liar

MODS how much may I swear.
....what is that last sentence supposed to mean?
Does this mean that you understood the first part of the post??

VOTE: Sonia
For playing the noob card, but mostly for the lack of punctuation.
In post 53, texcat wrote:Ha. And are you still claiming that you just learned how to post on this site?
starts off with questions and doesn't do anything with answers
In post 1373, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 740, texcat wrote:I'll never keep up with this level of activity. I hope things calm down after day one.

UNVOTE: Sonia

I've seen a lot of {a} is scum. Why? Because they're scummy. Not a lot of legitimate cases. But it's early.

I don't think that Saru's contradiction is much of a case. I didn't like his initial reaction to being wagoned, when he said he liked his own wagon (). But his later posts have been slightly better.

Transcend made some valid points about Xkyfu agreeing with every lynch going, but looking back at X's iso, it doesn't really look like he started out agreeing with everyone.

I'd consider voting Zyf just so that it would be easier to keep up.

VOTE: Tiershift
for his where he talked about his scum buddies bussing him.
Talks about reasons to scum read Saru
Talks about reasons to scum read Xkyfu
Talks about reasons to scum read zyf (my slot)
votes tiershift for bad reasons

Nvm about tiershift actually, probably Saru and Texcat.
Pls lynch???
pedit HAHA OK
In post 1375, Dwlee99 wrote:Voting trans but then deciding to fence sit is great. Also great how you suddenly start scum reading me when I begin to case you. :3
In post 1388, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1384, texcat wrote:I'd guess that town does have a doc and that they are not x- shot.

Dwee, I said that I hated Zyf.s claim when he made it. This is not new.
I can't tell if you're being deliberately dense.
Okay, so, you say you don't like transcend's claim, right, so doubtcasting, and then you make the position not as strong to distance yourself from it by saying "but I didn't like zyf's either", BUT THEN you doubtcast further by saying that the 2-shot part is fishy.
In post 1397, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1396, texcat wrote:
In post 1380, Vedith wrote:Okay
VOTE: Texcat

Texcat, talk about Dwlee to me.
Why do you think he's lying along with Zyf?
Claims that can't be proven are suspect in my book
this is bad
rtft

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:27 am
by texcat
@mod
-- my vote should be on Transcend ()