Page 58 of 84
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:03 pm
by OkaPoka
@trinity, who is your top scumread at the current moment? Top townread?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:07 pm
by TrinityNZ
I see your point on these posts. She has looked pretty strongly town, but might just be very clever and have pulled the wool over our eyes.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:10 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1425, OkaPoka wrote:@trinity, who is your top scumread at the current moment? Top townread?
Top townread is Nancy. I keep second guessing myself with my scum reads and changing my minds, but probably you at the moment.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:11 pm
by OkaPoka
baited.
why did you answer that question but not my other question(s)? ( i just want understand your mindset if you do flip town )
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:12 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1417, IcemanCh wrote:Well make that a double intent.
I don't think she's scum. I think I've lost interest in pursing Oka as scum. For now. I think I have other questions.
UNVOTE:
Why have you lost interest in Oka? Now would be the time as we’re so close to this mislynch on me.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:14 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1428, OkaPoka wrote:baited.
why did you answer that question but not my other question(s)? ( i just want understand your mindset if you do flip town )
LOL. So clever.
I’ve said several times that I had answered the question as much as I was going to, but you’re still going on about it, and trying to use this as a reason that others should lynch me. This is what makes you look scummy to me.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:15 pm
by TrinityNZ
Why tomorrow, and not today?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:18 pm
by OkaPoka
@trinity, but your answer is not satisfactory nor does it fit your own requirements. That is why I want evidence, and you aren't providing. It's a good reason to lynch you because you are acting in the interest of town by answering my question or providing proper evidence.
We sort Flicker tomorrow because I feel like a lot of her alignment is going to depend on your flip, and I don't want to derail my primary scumread's wagon so we can find out whether flicker is town or not today.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:23 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1386, Flicker wrote:@Quick
I think you're null-scum. Part of that might just be playstyle difference, partly I might have read too much into your early posts.
If Trinity flips town, I'm worried about the people I might have given too much towncred that could actually be scum, or if that's just paranoia from my first newbie game (where one of the scum team was pretty strongly townread across the board, and only on D3 by throwing out my reads and just looking at associations did I think he could be scum).
P-edit: My reads haven't changed from
1143, other than to move Trinity and maybe WhyMafia to null.
Flicker, it seems that you did a complete 180 on your read on me, and I’m not sure why, other than you;’re scum just getting on this convenient wagon. If you’re town, please have another look at me and make your own mind up!
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:24 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1432, OkaPoka wrote:@trinity, but your answer is not satisfactory nor does it fit your own requirements. That is why I want evidence, and you aren't providing. It's a good reason to lynch you because you are acting in the interest of town by answering my question or providing proper evidence.
We sort Flicker tomorrow because I feel like a lot of her alignment is going to depend on your flip, and I don't want to derail my primary scumread's wagon so we can find out whether flicker is town or not today.
Oka if you’re town, I have deep respect for your tenacity. I just wish you were spending this much effort looking in other directions. If you’re scum, then I understand why.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:27 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1272, Eragon wrote:I still have a sick feeling in my stomach putting someone to L-1
VOTE: Trinity
This is L-1. No more votey
Eragon, you’ve been on V/LA, so do you feel that you have a really good read on me as scum? If not, please have another look, as this wagon on me is going to end in a mislynch. If you’re town, you will care about that.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:03 pm
by nancy
In post 671, TrinityNZ wrote:Oka - scum lean, mainly because of the weak case he was trying to make on me, and
poor answers to questions others have asked
.
Trinity, would you mind quoting one or two of Oka's answers that you thought were poor around that time please?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:48 pm
by TrinityNZ
In post 1436, nancy wrote: In post 671, TrinityNZ wrote:Oka - scum lean, mainly because of the weak case he was trying to make on me, and
poor answers to questions others have asked
.
Trinity, would you mind quoting one or two of Oka's answers that you thought were poor around that time please?
I did reply with some quotes a while ago - I haven’t been able to find any others.
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:13 pm
by nancy
Do you mean your post
1009?
Post
28 was an answer to a theory question, which is usually not alignment indicative. Was there something specific you didn't like about his answer?
I didn't understand the other examples to be Oka's answers to other questions. Did you misspeak in the post where you listed your read on Oka, or am I not understanding you right, or something else?
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:11 am
by IcemanCh
In post 1429, TrinityNZ wrote: In post 1417, IcemanCh wrote:Well make that a double intent.
I don't think she's scum. I think I've lost interest in pursing Oka as scum. For now. I think I have other questions.
UNVOTE:
Why have you lost interest in Oka? Now would be the time as we’re so close to this mislynch on me.
It's probably better worded that I'm shelving my scum read on him at the moment. I'm tunneling him and it's not letting me push anywhere. We are not going to get him lynched today and I think for towns sake you have to be lynched. It is a mislynch but it's the only thing that will allow town to move on. I'll be very interested to see what he does tonight.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:12 am
by IcemanCh
I'm going to hammer in an hour after I've had coffee
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:31 am
by nancy
If you think Trinity is a mislynch, then don't hammer her, Iceman. Jeez. What the heckie.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:35 am
by Micc
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:07 am
by Eragon
Oof as soon as I got online LOL
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:26 am
by Eragon
In post 1435, TrinityNZ wrote: In post 1272, Eragon wrote:I still have a sick feeling in my stomach putting someone to L-1
VOTE: Trinity
This is L-1. No more votey
Eragon, you’ve been on V/LA, so do you feel that you have a really good read on me as scum? If not, please have another look, as this wagon on me is going to end in a mislynch. If you’re town, you will care about that.
Based on me ISO'ing you and that progression post I saw, yes I feel good about your SR.
On top of the fact, more often than not, the "this wagon on me is a mis-lynch" "I am town, look at scum" "if your town you will care" come from scum
Overall I find too much AtE very wolfy
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:13 am
by IcemanCh
In post 1441, nancy wrote:If you think Trinity is a mislynch, then don't hammer her, Iceman. Jeez. What the heckie.
That is silly. She is town but, getting her flip will help reveal scum.
Odd that quick hasn't hammered like he said he would and he's letting me do it.......
VOTE: trinity
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:17 am
by IcemanCh
It'll be interesting to see what scum does tonight.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:55 am
by Quick
In post 1445, IcemanCh wrote: In post 1441, nancy wrote:If you think Trinity is a mislynch, then don't hammer her, Iceman. Jeez. What the heckie.
That is silly. She is town but, getting her flip will help reveal scum.
Odd that quick hasn't hammered like he said he would and he's letting me do it.......
VOTE: trinity
I haven't even been online tbh. Had other things I had to do.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 7:00 am
by Flicker
Three things:
1. I don't know how much more time we have before night, but I'm working on responding to nancy's latest scum read on me now.
2. I would have liked for the wagons to stay where they were and for Quick to hammer, to force him (and everyone else) to take/keep a stand on them.
3.
Personally, I like to use the night to re-read the game without any pressure of keeping up with new posts, so sorry but I won't be doing this.
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2018 7:09 am
by IcemanCh
In post 1320, Quick wrote:I am coming around on Trinity. Feeling more and more like that is Scum.
Going to consolidate the wagons at this point, hate unvoting FF, but we need stances on stuff.
(was going to vote Trinity here). No longer going to because Trinity is at L-1.
Consider this an intent to hammer.
This was over 24 hours ago.