Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:22 pm
How can saying "wow" even be considered traitor crumbing?In post 1422, Nero Cain wrote:how is that a pr breadcrumb?
How can saying "wow" even be considered traitor crumbing?In post 1422, Nero Cain wrote:how is that a pr breadcrumb?
In post 1182, Vorkuta wrote:Ok I have like 50 questions now (most of them towards mbaki because what he says makes no sense and just comes off as anti-town)
-How am I at L-1? It takes 6 to lynch and I count 4 (DDL, mbaki, nc, & fish). Fish put me at L-2, not L-1.
-Ok really: was I the ONLY person annoyed at rb's wow's so much that I wanted to call them out on it?
But noooo it's scum!vork traitor hunting. How on earth is that a 'scum claim' or anything of the sort?
-Seriously- if you're going to use 'inexperience' as an argument for 'vork is scum', I'll do the same thing and say I'm so inexperienced I didn't even know traitor was a role. After all- 3 newbie games and no mafia 'traitors' in there.
-Why are you guys giving the lurksacks and fluffposters a huge pass and not pressuring them to say something?
Your entire game plan, reasoning, and logic basically hinges on ME to flip red, leaving you in a complete crisis with a third of the player cast unaccounted for when I flip green.
-Again: your claim to read rb's breadcrumbs is complete BS.
RB couldn't have '''crumbed''' me because I'm not scum.
How is rb's #17 ANY less valid than his alleged crumbing of me?
The way I see it: you found yourself an easy newbie scapegoat to lynch on D2.
It'll cause scum!mbaki no worries or issues whatsoever, it won't reveal ANY useful information ('oh noo suka's defending him' can go both ways and you know it), and scum is one mislynch closer to victory.
So please- can you explain to me (like I'm a complete newbie) how you got that I was """traitor-hunting""" and """scum-claiming""" from what I've said so far?
thats not what was being said.In post 1426, Creature wrote:How can saying "wow" even be considered traitor crumbing?In post 1422, Nero Cain wrote:how is that a pr breadcrumb?
In post 87, rb wrote:it's just unfortunate that suka probably isn't town otherwise we'd have a townbloc imo
wow such a shame tbh
Four potential "crumbs" directed at different people. Mostly calling people scum within the first 100 posts and then not really following up or playing it off as a joke. The odd one out is the one with Vorkuta, and the only one not initiated by rb. We'll come back to that. Like, you can make this crumbing argument with a LARGE number of players if you really try, which is possibly what rb wanted in case he died. Only scum knows who it was actually directed at if they caught it, rb doesn't have to be specific. Is one of the players he "crumbed" scum? Maybe. Is it enough to build a case on? I don't think so.In post 185, rb wrote:wow so true imoIn post 181, Vorkuta wrote:@rb- are you like... breadcrumbing with your 'wow's everywhere?
Is this your scumtell?
Who the fuck asks this? What town player asks this? Actually read this post and realize how much it doesn't make sense. Vorkuta asks if rb is breadcrumbing. Okay. Not ideal because it comes off as town PR fishing but forgivable for a newbie. Then he follows it up with "Is this your scumtell?" No one crumbs scum. The only reason you would ever crumb scum is if you were a traitor, and only scum would know there's a traitor in this game. Asking someone if their breadcrumbing isn't inherently the worst, asking someone if their scum isn't inherently the worst, but combined with rb's flip it looks really bad.@rb- are you like... breadcrumbing with your 'wow's everywhere?
Is this your scumtell?
BrightEyedFish is one of the players rb soft pressed throughout Day 1, and if we're going with the theory that mafia accidentally killed him because he posed a threat. This makes a lot more sense than Vorkuta killing someone who essentially claimed traitor directly to him.In post 743, BrightEyedFish wrote:If you think I'm scum then lynch me.In post 740, rb wrote:In post 730, BrightEyedFish wrote:I thought you were new to MS? Another lie?In post 729, mbaki wrote:Ah Mafiascum, you never disappoint.In post 732, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 291, mbaki wrote:He can't meta me because I don't play here.In post 733, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 307, mbaki wrote:I'm from another mafia site, so I doubt you do, but good luck if so!In post 735, BrightEyedFish wrote:and...so was this actually going anywhere or what?In post 737, BrightEyedFish wrote:Good for you I guess
BrightEyedFish wagon is now open for business
i'll gladly lynch either one
mbaki can't be trusted and is apparently only here to shit on MS. If you'd rather have him around that's fine. I on the other hand want him lynched.
I don't know what to make of this post. Looks even worse in retrospect when BrightEyedFish suddenly switches gears to Vorkuta because he realizes that will be the easier player to ML, and Mbaki will come shortly after.
His scum team read REALLY wants the domino effect of both Vork and mbaki townies being lynched.In post 1036, BrightEyedFish wrote:Rb, Cork, mbaki.
Yes Varsoon should play or get replaced. But I hate this post??? Pressing someone V/LA isn't magically gonna make them not be V/LA. We've already had one mislynch/policy lynch Day 1. Pushing for another one of those is bad.Creature wrote:Meanwhile we should start hardpressing Varsoon. It's pretty fair to require someone to play or otherwise eat a lynch.
I'm pretty sure Varsoon is able to post.In post 1437, Dannflor wrote:Pressing someone V/LA isn't magically gonna make them not be V/LA.
VOTE: CreatureIn post 1443, OkaPoka wrote:but none of us except for mbaki self voted
What about accidentally killing traitor though?In post 1446, Dannflor wrote:Scum, especially an experienced player, never gets that angry at that state of the game. There's also no reason for scum to manufacture that rage.