Mafiascum.net

In post 1424, RadiantCowbells wrote:lovebird could be scum i just realized.

Hard to engage with this when I don't really know why you townread them and I don't understand what switched.

i'm hard to engage with in general.

itt brigitte is online for a massive amount of time posting in scum thread but not in this game.

Also @Brigitte
alongw ith my previous question

can you crumb who you are to me in some way? if you're town and you've played with me odds are it'll help me sort you. i won't out it.

Didn't read the last 10 pages.
What'd I miss?

In post 1374, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 1122, Varsoon wrote:oh, man, that sounds a lot like a scum tactic that would be used to suffocate outlying town voices that are right.

it could just as easily be a town tactic used to suffocate scum voices

Marginalizing voice is never a town tactic because town needs content to gauge alignments.

Also it's probably likely that scum doesn't have sword flavor.

In post 1375, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 1133, implosion wrote:A lot of his play around suspicion on him feels like he's repeatedly going "a-ha, this reason to suspect me is actually invalid!" in a way that doesn't actually meaningfully engage with people, doesn't actually refute the points they were making, doesn't try to sort them. He's asking questions or making statements that don't lead anywhere interesting.

this (referring to Michael Scott) + pretty much everything in 1085 is absolutely in line with how I've been feeling, with a few extra points I hadn't even considered

Examples of questions that "don't lead anywhere"? Everything I asked was to gain an answer I could evaluate.

Also ofc I'll call out invalid reasons on invalid reasons. Activity tell - NAI, Robot tone - NAI.

In post 1431, Varsoon wrote:Also it's probably likely that scum doesn't have sword flavor.

What does this mean?

They're not swords. They could be, like, 'Rapiers', but not swords.
I DON'T KNOW, MICHAEL.

It was at this moment, Varsoon..

Knew he was fucked

Nah, man, I just know for sure the scum have a good chance of not being swords.

In post 1427, RadiantCowbells wrote:itt brigitte is online for a massive amount of time posting in scum thread but not in this game.

Why can't it be her neighbourhood?

In post 1430, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1374, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 1122, Varsoon wrote:oh, man, that sounds a lot like a scum tactic that would be used to suffocate outlying town voices that are right.

it could just as easily be a town tactic used to suffocate scum voices

Marginalizing voice is never a town tactic because town needs content to gauge alignments.

I've definitely marginalized voices before as town, especially if they're pushing on me. I remember in ONUW5 (on this site) I got so annoyed with scum!podoboq that I felt my only option was to tell him explicitly to shut up, because he was clogging the thread with misleading sophistry meant to screw over the town

If implosion is town and you've done nothing but pop into the thread every so often to say he's scum, with no real reasoning given, why wouldn't he marginalize that? It's not useful content to him in any way whatsoever, especially if he's already reading you scum for it

Hey man, when you've got scum, you hold onto that nugget.

In post 1432, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 1375, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 1133, implosion wrote:A lot of his play around suspicion on him feels like he's repeatedly going "a-ha, this reason to suspect me is actually invalid!" in a way that doesn't actually meaningfully engage with people, doesn't actually refute the points they were making, doesn't try to sort them. He's asking questions or making statements that don't lead anywhere interesting.

this (referring to Michael Scott) + pretty much everything in 1085 is absolutely in line with how I've been feeling, with a few extra points I hadn't even considered

Examples of questions that "don't lead anywhere"? Everything I asked was to gain an answer I could evaluate.

Also ofc I'll call out invalid reasons on invalid reasons. Activity tell - NAI, Robot tone - NAI.

In post 1433, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 1431, Varsoon wrote:Also it's probably likely that scum doesn't have sword flavor.

What does this mean?

is this seriously all you have to offer

@Johnny English, @Radiant, @Fractured - why do you not see this as scummy as I do?

@Reality Check/@Parm/@mbaki can you guys vote here

In post 1440, GuiltyLion wrote:is this seriously all you have to offer

No.
I'm reading the thread.
Geez.

Aw man, GL asked like everyone BUT me to look at MS.

In post 1439, Varsoon wrote:Hey man, when you've got scum, you hold onto that nugget.

I assumed that 3 hours ago when you commented on one of the latest posts, you had already read the thread

whoops sorry, wrong quote

Varsoon, you said I'm probably town, wanna talk about how you arrived there?
Changed your mind on hearing the cases on me?

In post 1443, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 1439, Varsoon wrote:Hey man, when you've got scum, you hold onto that nugget.

I assumed that 3 hours ago when you commented on one of the latest posts, you had already read the thread

Nope, haven't.
I've been very loosely following the game at certain parts/pages, but I get... nothing

what's your snap read on Varsoon

Scum

But who knows. Varsoon's play reminds me of Excalibur for some reason, I've seen him recently pretty passionate as town