In post 1420, DrDolittle wrote:ok. so your case on carmen boils down to: carmen votes wilky when there are votes on wilky's wagon, and otherwise parks vote on sasha.
i can see why you from conf-town bias sees carmen as scum. but an equally plausible case is that carmen just scum reads both of you and puts votes where wagon is big?
I don't see scum!carmen from your case.
That and the fact that Carmen has me and Sasha on a level standing but has cased me and hard pushed me and hasn't cased Sasha at all and very little pushing on the slot. You literally just said a minute ago that you liked the case so why change your mind so quick?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:04 am
by DrDolittle
1 - Wilky never responded immediately so that died off
2 - Wow look I guess I didn't do homework today. Must mean I'm scum.
Insomnia please, please, please vote Sasha we can come back to ddl
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:05 am
by DrDolittle
I am not fence-sitting. I have a clear read on many of the players.
@wilky: I thought about it more, and read the posts a bit more in context?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:07 am
by DrDolittle
In post 1423, insomnia wrote:If you disregard my slot, all you’ve done this game is fence-sitting
Your vote is still on me yet you aren’t even talking with me
You are the only vote on me
hmmm.. I looked over my iso and clearly that was incorrect. I just had a lot of strong reads in my head and I guess I never threw them down into posts.
In post 374, insomnia wrote:
156 and 296 , followed by 370 don’t add up buddy. In between these posts I’ve been REALLY pushing my scum read with conviction, yet your reason for voting me was that “I didn’t believe in my case”
You’re only now justifying your vote after placing it at a time in which I was suspected the most. Your posts are fluff. The only valuable thing or noteworthy will be this interaction.
A big part of my ISO up to my emergency message was pushing my read with full conviction, it’s odd for you to say I wasn’t. But it now fits your agenda on me and you can justify your parking vote from 296 because, indeed, I doubt myself now, since nobody is pushing this. I don’t want to tunnel and if people believe I’m pushing the wrong slot, maybe it’s time I stepped back and reconsider my reads. Which I have. My BEF scum case was indeed exaggerated, could still be viable but it’s not worth a push rn.
nuh uh. He's not here anymore but this is deliberately misrep. I argue that he is scum exaggerating his push on BEF when he had no case, and he admits that and showcases this by backing off. Plus, I argued for his lynch all the way at my BEF vote (which was clearly a meme vote if he was reading)
wake up sheeple. this is a scum.
In post 375, TTTT wrote:and just as I'm starting to think we should lynch you
for doing whatever it is you are doing
you go and post that
This is probably scum number 2.
In post 643, DrDolittle wrote:thinking about trying hard this game rather than coasting by with big memes
This didn’t happen
In post 913, DrDolittle wrote:anka, can you tell me why your read on insomnia is town? cause he seems really scummy from my perspective
In post 1402, DrDolittle wrote:all insomnia has been doing today is put out an omgus push on me. its a scum push
i'm trying to sort you and give you the benefit of the doubt like Anka suggested, but your insistence on not doing anything and just tunneling makes this really fucking hard. plus you said give you space and you can come up with reads. and now you have space but your reads still have no substance behind it.
I'm having a really hard time believing your push is genuine, rather than an empty handed scum push - because it's super easy to look committed and doing stuff as town that way.
Is this what you name “sorting”
You parked your vote on me and left the thread
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:07 am
by wilky
In post 1428, DrDolittle wrote:I am not fence-sitting. I have a clear read on many of the players.
@wilky: I thought about it more, and read the posts a bit more in context?
And what was that context? All I seen was you going from liking the case to removing the parts of the case you didn't want to mention then basically saying it was shallow without that info and accusing me of bias.
scum-tunnel is totally a thing btw.
it's super easy to baking anger into an emotion, and once you're tunnelling, then you don't have to pretend solve anymore
scum-tunnel is totally a thing btw.
it's super easy to baking anger into an emotion, and once you're tunnelling, then you don't have to pretend solve anymore
Insomnia has still been sorting whilst vote parked on you up until recently. In fact Insomnia has done much more sorting than you this game so i wouldn't go down that road if i were you
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:11 am
by DrDolittle
In post 1425, wilky wrote:That and the fact that Carmen has me and Sasha on a level standing but has cased me and hard pushed me and hasn't cased Sasha at all and very little pushing on the slot. You literally just said a minute ago that you liked the case so why change your mind so quick?
context was carmen was scum-reading you very much earlier on the day
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:11 am
by DrDolittle
yeah I know. I'm going to step back from insomnia and take you and anka's word that he could be town for now
In post 1425, wilky wrote:That and the fact that Carmen has me and Sasha on a level standing but has cased me and hard pushed me and hasn't cased Sasha at all and very little pushing on the slot. You literally just said a minute ago that you liked the case so why change your mind so quick?
context was carmen was scum-reading you very much earlier on the day
Right ok. We're starting to get somewhere but you still haven't considered the whole casing and pushing me in comparison to Sasha
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:13 am
by wilky
And also the misrep where Sasha accuses me of an omgus
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:17 am
by DrDolittle
wilky, I think you're town but I really don't see it.
Let's say I think A and B are scum, and I pref A over B, but both lynches are dope. A lot of other people also pref B, but less pref A. I want both lynched, but I should be largely presenting cases on A, right?
Of course that hinges on assumptions and I'm not carmen. But this is what I think her thought process is, and it's not outlandish of an assumption, right
Let's say I think A and B are scum, and I pref A over B, but both lynches are dope. A lot of other people also pref B, but less pref A. I want both lynched, but I should be largely presenting cases on A, right?
Of course that hinges on assumptions and I'm not carmen. But this is what I think her thought process is, and it's not outlandish of an assumption, right
Right o so what about the fact that the scum read on Sasha has existed for longer than the scum read on me? Shouldn't there been a case on Sasha before I even came onto Carmens radar?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:20 am
by insomnia
In post 1436, DrDolittle wrote:yeah I know. I'm going to step back from insomnia and take you and anka's word that he could be town for now
Of course you’re going to drop your scum read on me, like that would get you out of a lynch today
“YoU sEeMeD pReTtY cOnFiDeNt In ScUm!Me WhAt MaDe YoU cHanGe YoUr MiNd? I bElIeVe YoU dOn’T rEaLlY bElIvE yOuR pUsH oN mE”
Now you are out of scum reads, as if you ever had any
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:21 am
by insomnia
Sash flips town, savants
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:21 am
by insomnia
Whenever I push scum, people redirect on to sash ffs
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:21 am
by RadiantCowbells
All scum are not in (RC, DDL, Ankamius, Wilky, Creature, Shiidaji, Sheldon)
All scum are in (TTTT, Carmen, insomnia, BEF, Sashaddin, Macabre)
You know what the latter category almost all have in common?
Either scummy associatives with Sashaddin or are hard resisting the Sashaddin wagon
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:22 am
by wilky
In post 1444, insomnia wrote:Whenever I push scum, people redirect on to sash ffs
I'm not redirecting i told you ddl comes later. You really take a personal offence when we dont sheep you
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:23 am
by insomnia
Sash flips town that wagon is honestly dumb
Vig, be a good boy and shoot DrDo for me when that happens
Let's say I think A and B are scum, and I pref A over B, but both lynches are dope. A lot of other people also pref B, but less pref A. I want both lynched, but I should be largely presenting cases on A, right?
Of course that hinges on assumptions and I'm not carmen. But this is what I think her thought process is, and it's not outlandish of an assumption, right
Right o so what about the fact that the scum read on Sasha has existed for longer than the scum read on me? Shouldn't there been a case on Sasha before I even came onto Carmens radar?
@ddl???
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 5:24 am
by wilky
In post 1445, RadiantCowbells wrote:All scum are not in (RC, DDL, Ankamius, Wilky, Creature, Shiidaji, Sheldon)
All scum are in (TTTT, Carmen, insomnia, BEF, Sashaddin, Macabre)
You know what the latter category almost all have in common?
Either scummy associatives with Sashaddin or are hard resisting the Sashaddin wagon
