Mafiascum.net

In post 1418, nomnomnom wrote:Vorkuta's slot worries me, I have to say.

In post 1422, nomnomnom wrote:The game is going to go nowhere if all you do is spam pages and pages and pages of "HEY SLOT X, WHAT'S YOUR READ ON NOMNOM (THEY ARE SCUM BY THE WAY)" then just continually individually flood every one of them with a reason not to trust me. That's just stupid.

So just to be clear this is the 'interaction' you were looking for? You say you have problems with your slot and then discourage other people from asking for a read? Is that why you voted me when I asked for your read of schadd and Performer?

In post 1419, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 1415, MaryJoLisa wrote:

In post 1412, Detective Pikachu wrote:MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

I don't even remember CDB.

Meh. I really don't know.

You had CDB listed as null and you've been online. Do you think that nomnomnom therefore should be scumreading you since you haven't really been asking her questions or engaging her during the weekend?

I'm usually online. I'm actually fixing to log off earlier than I usually do, though. I'm not feeling 100% today.

I'm not scumreading Nomnom, per say. I tend not to like her approach in general but I haven't determined whether that's scummy.

There's an amount of misrepping I will accept because I accept this is a game of mafia and people will read things that people don't say because the brain can come to stupid conclusions when you are in a situation of constant stress and anxiety but you clearly reached the point where it's acceptable and talking with you will only result in pages of content where you continually read what YOU want to read. So I really advise you to stop and stop assuming everything I do is with scum intent and to stop putting words and intentions in my mouth. This is honestly gross.

We're in the middle of a real-time interaction and Vork and MJL just popped in.

IF your supposed scumread on me is predicated on me 'not interacting' with you on a Saturday afternoon

why do you *not* expect interaction when people are online and posting in real time?

How do your supposed reasons for scumreading me reconcile with how you are approaching Vork and MJL?

Piss off.

In post 1426, MaryJoLisa wrote: I'm usually online. I'm actually fixing to log off earlier than I usually do, though. I'm not feeling 100% today.

I just used "fixin'" in a written sentence.

In post 1427, nomnomnom wrote:There's an amount of misrepping I will accept because I accept this is a game of mafia and people will read things that people don't say because the brain can come to stupid conclusions when you are in a situation of constant stress and anxiety but you clearly reached the point where it's acceptable and talking with you will only result in pages of content where you continually read what YOU want to read. So I really advise you to stop and stop assuming everything I do is with scum intent and to stop putting words and intentions in my mouth. This is honestly gross.

You make this post, but right now I am trying to reconcile *your attitude toward how you conceive of your own townplay* with 1381

In post 1381, nomnomnom wrote:Pikachu hasn't interacted with my slot, while he should be sorting it since he believes I could be in one of the pairings.

That's scum indicative.

When that is not how you conceive of your own townplay in 1408 and 1409, and furthermore make the point that it is wrong to assume that other people will approach the game in the same way

In post 1408, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 1405, Detective Pikachu wrote:Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot

Except you are not me.

In post 1409, nomnomnom wrote:You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game. That's selective argumentation.

So as far as I can tell, not only are your reasons for supposedly scumreading me and pushing me to l-2 fake, but they are irreconcilable both for how *you imagine yourself approaching town play* and for *your own expectations for the range of town play vs. scum play*

This is a scum perspective slip and a failed attempt to justify an opportunistic vote

In post 1431, Detective Pikachu wrote:You make this post, but right now I am trying to reconcile *your attitude toward how you conceive of your own townplay* with 1381

In post 1395, Detective Pikachu wrote:Shut up scum

I'll repeat again: piss off.

In post 1426, MaryJoLisa wrote:I'm usually online. I'm actually fixing to log off earlier than I usually do, though. I'm not feeling 100% today.

I'm not scumreading Nomnom, per say. I tend not to like her approach in general but I haven't determined whether that's scummy.

Well I hope you feel better. When you've gotten some sleep I'd like to hear what you like about her approach. If you think I'm wrong here I'd like to know what you see that I'm missing

In post 1428, Detective Pikachu wrote:We're in the middle of a real-time interaction and Vork and MJL just popped in.

I'm Mary Poppins!

In post 1433, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 1426, MaryJoLisa wrote:I'm usually online. I'm actually fixing to log off earlier than I usually do, though. I'm not feeling 100% today.

I'm not scumreading Nomnom, per say. I tend not to like her approach in general but I haven't determined whether that's scummy.

Well I hope you feel better. When you've gotten some sleep I'd like to hear what you like about her approach. If you think I'm wrong here I'd like to know what you see that I'm missing

I hammered my finger today and it's swollen up quite a bit. I thought I didn't break it but the knuckle is starting to look pretty bad. I'm heading to bed.

its felt for a while like the only evidence that dp's posts are real thoughts that hes having in the moment are the confident / authoritative way he presents them

like its been boilerplate "i think this is fake. theres no reason u would think that. this is opportunistic." punctuated by "die scum fucka you everybody explain to me why theyre not voting this slot RIGHT now."

nom do you think you have good reads (in general not this game)

rather deep cut but hes the guy from the "my three girlfriends and yes they smoke weed" thing

In post 1436, schadd_ wrote:its felt for a while like the only evidence that dp's posts are real thoughts that hes having in the moment are the confident / authoritative way he presents them

like its been boilerplate "i think this is fake. theres no reason u would think that. this is opportunistic." punctuated by "die scum fucka you everybody explain to me why theyre not voting this slot RIGHT now."

He's not searching real interaction unless slots are interacting with him, and when they do he invariably thinks it must come from scum intent and spends his time discrediting the person voting him. It happened with you because apparently you were "obfuscating his votes", it happened with performer because setup speculation is apparently a scummy angle shoot, and it happens with me because I am dubious about his lack of interaction with me and with people in general.

He claims to want real interaction with me and wants me to clarify my stance but literally to shut up when I tried doing so. He just wants to pit me in the end because I am on his wagon. It's pointless discussion even if he happens to be town.

In post 1438, schadd_ wrote:rather deep cut but hes the guy from the "my three girlfriends and yes they smoke weed" thing

what does this mean?

In post 1437, schadd_ wrote:nom do you think you have good reads (in general not this game)

I do tend to overthink things through. I don't think I'm that good actually, and this is basically my big insecurity right there. I'm scared of looking like a total idiot and that's a reason why I tend to get over-emotional over games when I tend to be wrong. From what I've seen though, my first picks often tend to be right.

Let's just say I have spectacular town games, but in both directions, if you catch my drift.

In post 1439, nomnomnom wrote: He claims to want real interaction with me and wants me to clarify my stance but literally to shut up when I tried doing so.

I asked you for two reads and your response was to vote me and give neither of those reads

I'm like a movie director. If people work with me and point the flaws in my reasonings then I'm pretty sure town wins a lot of the time. If I am left unchecked alone rambling like an insane paranoid fool, then it might cause problems.

I also tend to take the leadership roles when it's actually fairly clear I perform much better when I let someone else take the wheel and point the flaws in their reasonings. It's hard to control honestly. I tend to get in the spot for better and for worse.

In post 1440, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 1438, schadd_ wrote:rather deep cut but hes the guy from the "my three girlfriends and yes they smoke weed" thing

what does this mean?

long

In post 1436, schadd_ wrote:its felt for a while like the only evidence that dp's posts are real thoughts that hes having in the moment are the confident / authoritative way he presents them

like its been boilerplate "i think this is fake. theres no reason u would think that. this is opportunistic." punctuated by "die scum fucka you everybody explain to me why theyre not voting this slot RIGHT now."

I mean for you to be town you have to be highly manipulative town. Personally I think it's fucking rich that nomnomnom tried to case me for not interacting with her when last night we were both doing the exact same thing--trying to make sense of N_M's slot. If she was town I think maybe she would have noticed that there was a multi-colored distraction for 1 of the 2 days she has been in the game?

I actually keep thinking I might be wrong on you, but posts like this don't make that any easier.

I'll be waiting for you to be reasonable and willing to work with me instead of pitting me in a corner and misrepping my statements, DP. Otherwise you're free to let your paranoia take over.

In post 1446, Detective Pikachu wrote:I actually keep thinking I might be wrong on you, but posts like this don't make that any easier.

In post 1445, schadd_ wrote:

In post 1440, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 1438, schadd_ wrote:rather deep cut but hes the guy from the "my three girlfriends and yes they smoke weed" thing

what does this mean?

long

Wow that's a pretty convoluted way to shade me so thanks for that, I'm remembering why I haven't wanted to play this game all over again