Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 2:21 am
Like it made me a bit paranoid at first, but then i checked Farside’s ISO and i’m not seeing much connection between her and Stan. Which makes me think you just said it to slander.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
What is this?
In post 302, popopopopopopo wrote:were not lynching farside day 1 felllas dont be ridiculous, now if she hasn't been nightkilled by like day 3 then we can seriously look at the situation
TBF that is the only thing he could say. I'm not scum and I could be off. I had this brief feeling of fear and being wrong for a few moments, but the unvote from Abr sealed it for me.In post 1424, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If Farside is scum then i accept the loss. I just think you’ve been kinda manipulative and i didn’t like how you said Farside was Stan’s scum buddy earlier when Farside went against you.
It’s not so much that you unvoted.
Believable or not, I havent seen once a investigative role survive to tell a single result beforeIn post 1419, farside22 wrote:Now lets me ask a question back word or to anyone.
Have you ever seen a cop with a guilty on a player unvote before?
Normally I would agree, but for me we are in a 1 scum vs 2 town situation here. If I am lynched then NBEE is the nightkill and day 4 is wasted on lynching ABR. If ABR is lynched then ill be the nightkill and NBEE survives 1 extra day. I cant prove this obviously but im not looking at this from the same perspective as you guysIn post 1431, word321 wrote:Believable or not, I havent seen once a investigative role survive to tell a single result beforeIn post 1419, farside22 wrote:Now lets me ask a question back word or to anyone.
Have you ever seen a cop with a guilty on a player unvote before?
---
Well, the dies r cast. Either way, a scum dies today or tomorrow.
Yeah, what was that?
You trying to make it seem like we lose the game and everyone will turn into apes and rage if you get lynched is kinda scummy sounding NGL...In post 1433, Albert B. Rampage wrote:youre going down stanley. Everyone who believes you now will throw the game and regret it immensely when I flip.
Are you confusing games or something?In post 1441, votato wrote:-
Yeah, that's what i've been thinking too. Gobbles being vig kill makes much more sense than it being scum motivated kill.In post 1440, farside22 wrote:I think there is a vig in the game and not a 3p. I had a thought on whom that was day 2 and the gobble kill doesn't make sense given that players were suspicious of him.
Okay. Lets wait for that claim then.In post 1444, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Which means Stanley most likely blocked the true night kill on me if that's the case. And that should confirm him as town, making Albert the scum in this 1v1.