Mafiascum.net

we will quite literally die on this hill.

In post 1423, androgybee wrote:

BananaCucho wrote:
Who are you going to use your suicide to purify?

not sure. who would you recommend?

Bell wrote:Can these set ups even have punishment for full claims?

uh, absolutely.

I mean you've had ample time to consider who you should be using this ability on haven't you?

In post 1361, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My role isn't super powerful so i don't mind claiming it now.

I've got one of the powers the saintess had.

I'm the

Cleric

. I can use atonement and decrease the corruption of a player i target at night by 1 point.

Night 1 i targeted Catboi.

That's it really.
But i crumbed my role in one of the first posts i had in the game. (13)

Either Cleric is a safeclaim or there's multiple of us. Noob that I am I asked Dunnstral if it was possible earlier, when NEE crumbed it. 'said it wasn't bastard but couldn't comment otherwise.
Didn't target Porkens N1 because they weren't a big tr and the ideas that maf with too much corruption might be extra pushy for others to eliminate if they can't risk a hammer + more likely to join a wagon early, seemed like it could be useful.
Same logic for anyone else, really, what with not having strong town reads iirc.

So you're saying you're a cleric too Red?

Wow. This is getting interesting.

In post 1427, redtea wrote:

In post 1361, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My role isn't super powerful so i don't mind claiming it now.

I've got one of the powers the saintess had.

I'm the

Cleric

. I can use atonement and decrease the corruption of a player i target at night by 1 point.

Night 1 i targeted Catboi.

That's it really.
But i crumbed my role in one of the first posts i had in the game. (13)

Either Cleric is a safeclaim or there's multiple of us. Noob that I am I asked Dunnstral if it was possible earlier, when NEE crumbed it. 'said it wasn't bastard but couldn't comment otherwise.
Didn't target Porkens N1 because they weren't a big tr and the ideas that maf with too much corruption might be extra pushy for others to eliminate if they can't risk a hammer + more likely to join a wagon early, seemed like it could be useful.
Same logic for anyone else, really, what with not having strong town reads iirc.

Can you reword this a bit? Or it may be me, it's past 1:30 am and I'm really tired

But are you saying that you're not only named the exact same role, "Cleric", but that the ability matches as well?

anyway it's like 4am so im goin to bed goodnight

~nahdia

Also Redtea, who DID you target n1?

In post 1431, androgybee wrote:anyway it's like 4am so im goin to bed goodnight

~nahdia

See you tomorrow, think about who you are going to purify

I fundamentally don't understand how full claims can have associated mechanics to punish it. This is probably just me lacking enough experience for these game types.

Pedit:
I't 12:40 here. I thought about turning in, but this is really interesting.

- Norwee (Decrease corruption by 1)
- redtea (Decrease corruption by 1)
- Bell (increase corruption by 1 with loud modifier)
- Banana (Self-harm 1 corruption to increase day time by 24 hours, Can't place votes at 0 corruption.)
androgybee (Self-destructing purification role thing...?)
() S_S - (Mod confirmed role, Jack of all trades)

Jackel -
() NDMath -
() Joey_ -

Not claimed:
- Dumb and Dumber
- catboi
- starbuck
- Porkens

In post 1434, Bell wrote:I fundamentally don't understand how full claims can have associated mechanics to punish it. This is probably just me lacking enough experience for these game types.

Pedit:
I't 12:40 here. I thought about turning in, but this is really interesting.

Ya'll are keeping me from my new book, jerks

Lol, go read your book.
I'll think a little, probably get nowhere and turn in.

Cleric crumbs in
#1009
#1025, in relation to Norwee's obvious softclaim. Wasn't gonna elaborate unless we claimed today/Dunnstral was a gift-giving mod lolol

In post 1427, redtea wrote:Either Cleric is a safeclaim or there's multiple of us.

I COULD believe this on the premise that Saintess had the exact same ability as me (and you apparently) with atonement.

There are more corruption roles I think.

Why do we have 3 roles that can cure corruption? Just how many of you received corruption last night?

Or someone is lying.

In post 1440, Bell wrote:There are more corruption roles I think.

This is why it's important imo for people to claim if they got corruption last night as well

I didn't target anyone because I had scumhunting theories stronger than townreads.

In post 1438, redtea wrote:#1025, in relation to Norwee's obvious softclaim. Wasn't gonna elaborate unless we claimed today/Dunnstral was a gift-giving mod lolol

That explains your reaction. So makes me thing you're not joking about your ability. Not sure if scum wouldn't theoretically have an exact copy of my role except mafia aligned tho.

And a suicide role that purifies corruption... what the hell

In post 1444, redtea wrote:I didn't target anyone because I had scumhunting theories stronger than townreads.

You can cure corruption but didn't target anyone N1?

In post 1444, redtea wrote:I didn't target anyone because I had scumhunting theories stronger than townreads.

Can you explain this please

How can you not target anyone n1

Like... what