Mafiascum.net

In post 1422, Fidget wrote:Noraa, you're really good at trying to look as scummy as possible.

DrippingGoofball wrote:Tayl0r is blinded by Noraa's sucking up and will never be able to peg Noraa as scum.

That's the whole point of Noraa's strategy, and human nature being what it is, it's going to work.

I too am aware of what Noraa's scum game looks like. She's more confident and extremely accusatory. She's slipping into it a bit >.>

I disagree that Tayl0r is being distracted by Noraa doing something, because when Noraa replaced in I also noticed a pretty distinct difference in Noraa's tone when she was referring to the PlusJOYED wagon/her read on it.

In post 1377, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1355, Fidget wrote:

In post 1341, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 1223, Fidget wrote:Why is the counter wagon Marashu over Nosferatu? Has Marashu been independently scummy enough to override choosing Nosferatu, who was in the gladiate and also doesn't really have much in the way of content?

VOTE: Nos

you don't want to vote taylor?

No why

In post 1346, Nosferatu wrote:i think continuing to push scum in the gladiate is low effort

really? 3 nulls in one gladiate and nothings up?

There's no good reason to believe all 3 in the gladiate must be town. I can only see it as a possibility.

If all 3 in the gladiate are town, I'd kind of expect more people (scum) to be going "Well there has to be 1 scum in there, right?" It's odd to me that it just isn't happening and instead we're not talking about the gladiate hardly at all.

Yes there are 3 nulls in there although arguably you could say DGB wasn't null and you could say Eddie/Marashu were also null slots.

This is nitpicky, but I don't understand the reference to Marashu since only DGB and Eddie were in the gladiate.

In post 1426, Noraa wrote:U-U so fidget I am now scum?

In post 1313, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1268, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1264, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1261, Gypyx wrote:So... i basically skimmed through the thread, not much of importance happened? Anyways pretty sure glitch is town for the nos vote

Huh?

Specifically asking about the glitch is town for the nos vote statement.

Basically, i don't think voting nosferatu makes sense as a vote for Glitch, i don't see this as a bus, and why would you try to start a brand new wagon if you were in scum!glitch's PoV

In post 1431, Fidget wrote:

In post 1426, Noraa wrote:U-U so fidget I am now scum?

Probably not but I guess I should actually try to read your slot better because you're slipping into the way I assumed scum!you plays.

You OMGUS with nonexistent reasoning and confidently call people scum for it. I imagine you are probably eliminated for that a lot.

In post 1434, Gypyx wrote:Hmmmm, now i thought about something, it might be a bit far-fetched but hear me out :
Would scum!noraa care that much about what are Taylor's tell on her? Because she knows they're false anyways (unless taylor is scum too and we're witnessing some spicy scum theatre)

In post 1424, Glitch wrote:

In post 1311, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i mean i agree, and i wish marashu would post more. but have you done a metadive to see if being lurky is AI for marashu? i feel like your push on marashu is IIOA: youre telling us hes lurky but not why that makes him scum.

This is a blatant misrep. Titus clearly explains why being lurky is advantageous to scum in a game where you, a prestigious player here, voice opposition to voting for lurkers:

In post 1299, Titus wrote:The longer you let this continue, the longer you tell scum that efforting means getting lynched.

In post 1432, Glitch wrote:

In post 1313, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1268, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1264, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1261, Gypyx wrote:So... i basically skimmed through the thread, not much of importance happened? Anyways pretty sure glitch is town for the nos vote

Huh?

Specifically asking about the glitch is town for the nos vote statement.

Basically, i don't think voting nosferatu makes sense as a vote for Glitch, i don't see this as a bus, and why would you try to start a brand new wagon if you were in scum!glitch's PoV

ping
1261 is so IIoA + an easy read that when clarified doesn't make that much sense. I want to see more effort from Gypyx.

Gypyx, why is it not scummy for me to start a brand new wagon? Can you give us some reads list or solve or something to help us gauge where you're at?

In post 1342, Tayl0r Swift wrote:nos v titus there could easily be SvS. they lightly neg each other, but mostly agree and nos sheeps titus, while they are both really defending each other. and meanwhile titus is pushing one lurker slot while giving another a pass.

In post 1354, Vecna wrote:Guess I was wrong about scum going for a solid bus today.

In post 1355, Fidget wrote:If all 3 in the gladiate are town, I'd kind of expect more people (scum) to be going "Well there has to be 1 scum in there, right?" It's odd to me that it just isn't happening and instead we're not talking about the gladiate hardly at all.

In post 1440, Glitch wrote:I'm catching up!

In post 1342, Tayl0r Swift wrote:nos v titus there could easily be SvS. they lightly neg each other, but mostly agree and nos sheeps titus, while they are both really defending each other. and meanwhile titus is pushing one lurker slot while giving another a pass.

I honestly see Titus as town through this whole interaction and your unwillingness to consider the validity of her arguments + that misrep I quoted which I feel is clearly in bad faith makes me lean scum on your slot, TS. The failure to even mention the weirdness of Noraa worshipping you also is off. I just don't get it. Really considering moving my vote to you.

In post 1373, Titus wrote:

In post 1372, Noraa wrote:why the defeatism?

I am old enough to have seen this pattern play out before.

People won't see Mara avoiding the thread as scummy. They need more content. So he continues avoiding the thread, knowing he'll get defended for it. He won't be providing content anytime soon.

When "lurker" slots show up, like Eddie and Nos, they get wagoned for showing up. So why would Mara? It's anti-scum for him to show.

I highlight this pattern. I get scumread. There's been enough focus on me/nos/dgb which is the real townblock this game.

I can't carry a town that punishes effort.

In post 1374, Noraa wrote:Ur hiding behind too many people.

In post 1447, Glitch wrote:

In post 1374, Noraa wrote:Ur hiding behind too many people.

You really need to stop making this argument when you openly hide behind TS.