Mafiascum.net

Yeah I’ll wait to respond to the real Bypasser, but quick thoughts:
I figured DGB would be a controversial read. I can do a dive to justify if you want.
Don’t know why locktown andres is all that controversial. I’d be curious why that pinged
Nero is one of my least confident reads, but I liked them better than the people in null. It was the last I put on the list.
Vax and Mom, I think the pings are probably fair.

Strong disagree with you that Bino is obvtown, which is a take I think you gave in reference to their NotMafia response.. They have two games, one scum, one mason, and both post exactly like this. I think them saying “I think NotMafia put me on top of the readlist to try to shade me by association” is just...Binatog.

In post 1425, quiet wrote:Vax and Mom, I think the pings are probably fair.

What?

In post 1400, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1390, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:

In post 1381, NorwegianboyEE wrote:N_M wasting his vote on a slot that’s not got any other votes and ignoring the other leading wagon is weird if scum.

It doesn't seem rational to be hung up on having one vote on you when the vote count has 2 rolling wagons and traction on a third.

What is it about Not Mafia's vote that's got to you?

I’m not allowed to be curious why someone is voting me?

Poor response. Answer, please.

In post 1427, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:

In post 1400, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1390, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:

In post 1381, NorwegianboyEE wrote:N_M wasting his vote on a slot that’s not got any other votes and ignoring the other leading wagon is weird if scum.

It doesn't seem rational to be hung up on having one vote on you when the vote count has 2 rolling wagons and traction on a third.

What is it about Not Mafia's vote that's got to you?

I’m not allowed to be curious why someone is voting me?

Poor response. Answer, please.

No.

i agree with the No, this line is pointless Norfolk.

In post 1426, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What?

I don’t think my stated reasons why I put Vax or Mom where I did were super clear or effective. I think it’s fair for him to not like them.

In post 1430, quiet wrote:

In post 1426, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What?

I don’t think my stated reasons why I put Vax or Mom where I did were super clear or effective. I think it’s fair for him to not like them.

Do you have a more clear reasoning for both those reads then?

In post 1394, Bypasser Catcher wrote:

In post 1393, Titus wrote:Lots of shiny wagons. I like this in the long term.

In the short term, I'm conflicted bc the people I don't think are town are agreeing with me.

And who might that be.

Norwat, Ranny, BBMolla

Galaxy brain: different browsers for different accounts

In post 1432, Titus wrote:

In post 1394, Bypasser Catcher wrote:

In post 1393, Titus wrote:Lots of shiny wagons. I like this in the long term.

In the short term, I'm conflicted bc the people I don't think are town are agreeing with me.

And who might that be.

Norwat, Ranny, BBMolla

I didn’t realize I was your scumread, but I’m mostly curious what I said that you agree with.

In post 1397, Luca Blight wrote:Hayker is basically a newbie (based on their meta and play style), and generally newbies look scummy as either alignment. I’m willing to give him a little more leeway than PlusJOYED, given the context.

This makes little sense comparing join dates as BC comments.

In post 1434, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 1432, Titus wrote:

In post 1394, Bypasser Catcher wrote:

In post 1393, Titus wrote:Lots of shiny wagons. I like this in the long term.

In the short term, I'm conflicted bc the people I don't think are town are agreeing with me.

And who might that be.

Norwat, Ranny, BBMolla

I didn’t realize I was your scumread, but I’m mostly curious what I said that you agree with.

Hawker vote

In post 1414, Luca Blight wrote:I didn’t say meta necessarily supports PlusJOYED over Hayker, I said I’m willing to give Hayker more leeway as they’re basically a newbie.

Really reevaluating my Luca read.

Ok, I missed NM claiming. What was it?

It was an even night weak neighborizer claim and then a tracker crumb just afterwards.

Intent to vote Hawker but I don't want to accidentally hammer.

In post 1422, DkKoba wrote:im gonna point out what reads i find a bit egregious, or rather I have massive pings on wrt how im viewing the game atm vs ur explainations. yellow = mild red=major

Look, I find quiet’s read list to be without substance too, but I don’t think putting it through the wringer (ringer?) is going to help at this stage. With day 1, 20 players, and a lot of junk without a flip, asking someone to have really sophisticated reads right now is asking a lot.

Quiet’s list might be useful going forward because we can watch if there’s a natural progression going forward, but I don’t think it’s useful now.

In post 1439, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It was an even night weak neighborizer claim and then a tracker crumb just afterwards.

Thank you.

I actually like 1441 a lot.

I find it really annoying that Hayker went AWOL just like Cheeky once becoming a wagon.

In post 1438, Titus wrote: Hawker vote

In post 1438, Titus wrote:Ok, I missed NM claiming. What was it?

Uh, this is pretty lazy. I voted Hawker because NM claimed and I was sheeping others to get off that wagon. I even said later that I don’t know what makes Hawker stand out from other lurkers. Is lazy the new Titus meta?

In post 1441, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 1422, DkKoba wrote:im gonna point out what reads i find a bit egregious, or rather I have massive pings on wrt how im viewing the game atm vs ur explainations. yellow = mild red=major

Look, I find quiet’s read list to be without substance too, but I don’t think putting it through the wringer (ringer?) is going to help at this stage. With day 1, 20 players, and a lot of junk without a flip, asking someone to have really sophisticated reads right now is asking a lot.

Quiet’s list might be useful going forward because we can watch if there’s a natural progression going forward, but I don’t think it’s useful now.

I was marking what I thought was bad for future reference in case I die, not primarily for current discussion.

I like to leave a "path to solve the game" for people in the case I die since I tend to die the night before I get my "aha" moment or am on the right track, etc.

In post 1445, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 1438, Titus wrote: Hawker vote

In post 1438, Titus wrote:Ok, I missed NM claiming. What was it?

Uh, this is pretty lazy. I voted Hawker because NM claimed and I was sheeping others to get off that wagon. I even said later that I don’t know what makes Hawker stand out from other lurkers. Is lazy the new Titus meta?

judging by recent games I don't think there's anything AI u can gather from the shift in playstyle here from her usual play. Just follow her pushes and judge from there.

Ok, I thought you were about to tear into it