Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 9:49 am
i'm okay with the town-Bell world.
I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
That's awful.In post 1426, Thestatusquo wrote:Also my movers canceled on me literally 20 minutes before my move was scheduled so I have spent a frantic day desperately trying to find someone to move my stuff before my lease is over and I have no more legal right to be here.
I have succeeded but I just want everyone to know that today took several days off my life.
I'm honestly pretty shocked that you think i would play that way as scum even if that was an accurate description of my play.In post 1427, Titus wrote:I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
If I tell you would it mean you won't do another catch up post where you complement me repeatedly?In post 1432, Flea The Magician wrote:Anything important for me to know about in the last 20ish pages that appeared in the 30ish hours since my last post?
I judge everyone (or try to) by the same standard. Does this player hurt town? If so, what is their motivation. Your reluctance to call people town has been worrying me as town should be blocking to win.In post 1429, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm honestly pretty shocked that you think i would play that way as scum even if that was an accurate description of my play.In post 1427, Titus wrote:I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
I just don't think I've been refusing to call people town. I think that's just straight up not a fair or correct statement about my play this game.In post 1438, Titus wrote:I judge everyone (or try to) by the same standard. Does this player hurt town? If so, what is their motivation. Your reluctance to call people town has been worrying me as town should be blocking to win.In post 1429, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm honestly pretty shocked that you think i would play that way as scum even if that was an accurate description of my play.In post 1427, Titus wrote:I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
A lot of your posts have been attacking people for being scum suspects then dropping it. I'm not saying you're refusing to do so. I just don’t see you working to find a town core, but when you occasionally do post that some people are town, I go back and doubt.In post 1439, Thestatusquo wrote:I just don't think I've been refusing to call people town. I think that's just straight up not a fair or correct statement about my play this game.In post 1438, Titus wrote:I judge everyone (or try to) by the same standard. Does this player hurt town? If so, what is their motivation. Your reluctance to call people town has been worrying me as town should be blocking to win.In post 1429, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm honestly pretty shocked that you think i would play that way as scum even if that was an accurate description of my play.In post 1427, Titus wrote:I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
Oh that would be tons of fun lol!In post 1404, Bell wrote:Wait, is Fakran your brother or sister Chara?
I don't see any of them as lhf though? They are popular townreads afaik, even if there are people who disagree.In post 1393, Bell wrote:Lld, Morph, Shea,In post 1390, Farkran wrote:Name 3 players that are not meh - direct me to understand your povIn post 1386, Bell wrote:They're meh this game.In post 1381, NDMath wrote:Why Chara? I'm not finding anything about them in your iso.In post 1318, Bell wrote:There should be more votes on Chara and Ndmath imo.
Also, I don't like that scum aren't going for these particular LHF, so I figure ha the reason they aren't is because they're their buddies.
I think you and I approach finding scum in very different ways. Attacking people and then dropping it is how I read people.In post 1440, Titus wrote:A lot of your posts have been attacking people for being scum suspects then dropping it. I'm not saying you're refusing to do so. I just don’t see you working to find a town core, but when you occasionally do post that some people are town, I go back and doubt.In post 1439, Thestatusquo wrote:I just don't think I've been refusing to call people town. I think that's just straight up not a fair or correct statement about my play this game.In post 1438, Titus wrote:I judge everyone (or try to) by the same standard. Does this player hurt town? If so, what is their motivation. Your reluctance to call people town has been worrying me as town should be blocking to win.In post 1429, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm honestly pretty shocked that you think i would play that way as scum even if that was an accurate description of my play.In post 1427, Titus wrote:I like this post because I was concerned you were just attacking and only defending scum.In post 1424, Thestatusquo wrote:That's why I focused on the thing I found conciliatory before. The times I've seen caught scum Bell it kind of seemed to me like he was trying to please everyone and not make waves. This post is the literal opposite of that and seems pretty organic in tone i.e. I would be surprised if it were a conscious decision as scum to try to make me feel like he wasn't doing a thing that he doesn't even really know I think he sometimes does as scum.
We need to solidify town then get rid of everyone else.
Eh, i think i came to agree with you. Bell can go to the d1 townbinIn post 1422, Thestatusquo wrote:This post in particular I'd eat my hat if it came from scum.In post 1400, Bell wrote:He should have been more specific about what he wanted when he asked me to name 3 players that weren't playing meh this game then.
This hat.