Mafiascum.net

In post 1422, Kate Bishop wrote:And if she is groupscum Luke dies next

In post 1421, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 1413, Lukewarm wrote:No 640 was specifically talking about your reads. Both town and scum (well lack of scum reads). I voted you in 257. That was not enough to scum read me in 640.

Now you are scum reading me and claiming to not have read anything in between.

And you said the reason I made that list was because I was voting you. That does not explain why I was not a scum read then, but I am now.

At no point have I called anyone scum this game.

In post 517, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 516, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 514, unwnd wrote:Erm, convinced so soon?

What's your individual reason to not like Luke if I may ask

I wouldn't say convinced. It's more like an obvious conclusion based on my previous statements.

Luke vote on me is just opportunistic and more of a sheep vote.

I would not call my vote a sheep vote. I saw your post, and thought it was scummy, and voted you before I even got to the point that LLD voted you for it.

That post looked more like someone in a mind set of "don't let town blocks form" then someone who looked at her posts and decided if it was town or not.

In post 1176, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Feels like his focus is really all on DGB in his catchup to me.

In post 1431, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1176, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Feels like his focus is really all on DGB in his catchup to me.

In every single post, Lukewarm and Manatee keep up the refrain "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum" "DGB is scum"

Like propaganda, convincing by repetition. It's subliminal but it's highly effective.

In post 1239, Lukewarm wrote:I was talking about my scum reads on DGB and Toog.

In post 1221, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1220, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 1099, Lukewarm wrote:Okay. I am officially caught up!

With a single read through, I am at

Town:
Dunn
LLd
Cabd, Unwnd
Gif, SSMB

Null:
Kate, Marci, Wheme

Scum:
Toog , DGB

------

(Manatee left off intentionally.)

Because someone else mentioned me leaning scum on her before, Marci is back to null mainly because both Kate and Cabd are so hard town reading her, I feel like I am missing something and want to look at her against when doing isos.

This is the list I was referring to. What strikes me about it is that I'm TRing everyone he TRs. He has Toog and Marci way lower than I do, but the rest of his SRs/null are low enough that it feels like if he is scum then some of my TRs are wrong.

I'm looking at something close to my own readslist here which is concerning me. I feel like Luke's catchup just now matches the style of catchup that he's said he does in the past (I think in Crono Trigger he said this). Where he says he reads ahead and posts things that will get him to where he wants to be rather than catching up and posting as he catches up. So the focus on DGB during his catchup really stands out

Why does this not make you think they are town?

In post 1437, Lukewarm wrote:But seriously, what are your thoughts on LLD having you as a scum read?

In post 1438, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1239, Lukewarm wrote:I was talking about my scum reads on DGB and Toog.

How convenient that these are LLD's reads, and LLD rarely switches directions. You can count on her pushing these reads until she gets her way.

If I were scum I'd support all her reads too.

In post 1430, ManateeGal wrote:difference btwn this and NQN is i had fun flailing around in that one

In post 1437, Lukewarm wrote:Or are you only interested in pointing out the people you think you can discredit?

In post 1445, GuyInFreezer wrote:ngl gun to my head Toog claim is NLT.