Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:29 pm
* be9ng in an unproven mason claim day1, to clarify before people shout at me
What play needs absolving?In post 1424, skitter30 wrote:I find him scummy but this isnt a read i'm going to pursue rn since i'm going to let night actions sort it out, yes
I'm not gonna retrofit my reads and day his play wasnt scummy at the time because someone claimed masons eith him later
You were literally two weeks ago in a game where town fakeclaimed masons with scum, being in a mason claim doesnt absolve you of your play
This makes a lot of sense.In post 1413, fireisredsir wrote:i don't see the point in not believing the claim at the moment
but I will say that crumbing (in the least secretive way possible) in an entry post and then literally 25 minutes later being like "im mason, look at my crumbs for proof" and then "oh i had to claim because both masons were wagoned QUICK VOTE THESE SPECIFIC OTHER PEOPLE THERE'S NO TIME" is hilarious
i especially like the "hum de dum I'm gonna go hunt scum in a VC" and then coming back with "oh NO me and my mason partner are the lead wagons?? whaaat??" for extra dramatic effect
as much as I don't think Math is very good I don't think Math is the kind that would lulz claim like that. They are either legit masons and he was worried they'd be hammered without a claim or are scum together. I think your example is trash.In post 1424, skitter30 wrote:You were literally two weeks ago in a game where town fakeclaimed masons with scum
I see. I am nothing.In post 1303, fua wrote:Malcolm, Nero, STD.In post 1301, Aristeia wrote:Who are you talking about specifically?In post 1297, fua wrote:I TR people who were on the side of HEM at the moment.
UNVOTE: HEM
That’s a bad vote imhoIn post 1429, DeasVail wrote:I still have to read up but I’m feeling like voting for fua?
Okay I’m literally confused by Wu’s post
Right? I thought it was a humorous tidbit mostly.In post 1430, fireisredsir wrote:in some ways I don't really like people agreeing with that post tbh
You’re more than welcome to do thatIn post 1434, skitter30 wrote:I said i dont believe rhe claim and that i would let night actions resolve the pair of slots
And i can have reads on both slots based on play independant of the claim
What I mean is that I also think it's strange that MathBlade breadcrumbed mason and then quickly claimed.In post 1429, DeasVail wrote:I still have to read up but I’m feeling like voting for fua?
Okay I’m literally confused by Wu’s post
I like how they’ve responded to my replace in and posts and just answer questions cooperatively. The VC doesn’t seem to imply them scum which with a game this broad is good enough for me.In post 1435, DeasVail wrote:Right? I thought it was a humorous tidbit mostly.In post 1430, fireisredsir wrote:in some ways I don't really like people agreeing with that post tbh
Maybe I’m just as bad for agreeing with this post though!
MathBlade why is fua town?
I feel like it's substanceless and poorly justified, like you're trying to fit current me into the initial scumread you had of me based on my push of Tenebro. "We have completely different reads" shouldn't be in the same case as "They said I have bad takes" because I'm obviously going to think you have bad takes with different reads. Doesn't mean I can't still read your play as relatively townie even if the tree you are barking up is on the other side of the planet from mine.In post 1436, skitter30 wrote:Fua any comment on my vote on you?
Oh no! I made a decision based on me and my mason partner being wagoned meaning scum were in control of the game. I must be scum /sIn post 1438, GeneralWu wrote:What I mean is that I also think it's strange that MathBlade breadcrumbed mason and then quickly claimed.In post 1429, DeasVail wrote:I still have to read up but I’m feeling like voting for fua?
Okay I’m literally confused by Wu’s post
Maybe he changed his thought process quickly, but that's sorta hard to believe.
Wait but then why did you breadcrumb mason like 25 minutes before you claimed?In post 1444, MathBlade wrote:Oh no! I made a decision based on me and my mason partner being wagoned meaning scum were in control of the game. I must be scum /sIn post 1438, GeneralWu wrote:What I mean is that I also think it's strange that MathBlade breadcrumbed mason and then quickly claimed.In post 1429, DeasVail wrote:I still have to read up but I’m feeling like voting for fua?
Okay I’m literally confused by Wu’s post
Maybe he changed his thought process quickly, but that's sorta hard to believe.
It’s posts like this that make Wu scum.
I immediately crumbed on replacing in. What do you expect timetravel?In post 1446, GeneralWu wrote:Wait but then why did you breadcrumb mason like 25 minutes before you claimed?In post 1444, MathBlade wrote:Oh no! I made a decision based on me and my mason partner being wagoned meaning scum were in control of the game. I must be scum /sIn post 1438, GeneralWu wrote:What I mean is that I also think it's strange that MathBlade breadcrumbed mason and then quickly claimed.In post 1429, DeasVail wrote:I still have to read up but I’m feeling like voting for fua?
Okay I’m literally confused by Wu’s post
Maybe he changed his thought process quickly, but that's sorta hard to believe.
It’s posts like this that make Wu scum.
It’s possible that boat wagons are town but not likely.In post 1447, Nero Cain wrote:Am I playing with the right sibling? Not too terribly long ago I played with Titus and she did a similar thing came in and said one of the leading wagons were scum. They were both town.