Mafiascum.net

In post 1430, skitter30 wrote:titus how much of the game have you read?

In post 1419, the worst wrote:i kind of feel like the basis of this conversation is that if i don't play a specific way, i am not a good person, and that's a hard premise to engage with. i also don't think your question was town motivated ("sincerity" or whatever is kind of moot in the middle of a social deception game). i'm fine leaving this as an impasse, would you be ok chatting about it post-game?

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

In post 1375, Pavowski wrote:I am back on my pagetop shiznik

In post 1429, skitter30 wrote:too out of it to be partnered imo
doesn't know people and doesn't know what's going on, doesn't seem to be getting help wrt how to interact with the forum, etc

i could be wrong but it would be a p convincing act

In post 1434, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

if a wagon formed on Titus/Isis I might join it
besides that all my suspects are people either voting or who have voted me

In post 1407, the worst wrote:

In post 1360, the worst wrote:

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

interesting indeedy. do you think it's ai?

In post 1361, Aristeia wrote:do you think it's ai?

how is reversing a question that i'd just asked someone else "a good faith question"? like why would i ever be incentivised to answer this when you asked it?

i think gamma's specific brand of explosion is probably town indicative. i don't think that's specifically because of the vote pattern pav was looking at though and i was interested in him expanding.

In post 1437, Titus wrote:

In post 1434, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

if a wagon formed on Titus/Isis I might join it
besides that all my suspects are people either voting or who have voted me

Why us two?

What do your reads look like?

In post 1438, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1407, the worst wrote:

In post 1360, the worst wrote:

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

interesting indeedy. do you think it's ai?

In post 1361, Aristeia wrote:do you think it's ai?

how is reversing a question that i'd just asked someone else "a good faith question"? like why would i ever be incentivised to answer this when you asked it?

i think gamma's specific brand of explosion is probably town indicative. i don't think that's specifically because of the vote pattern pav was looking at though and i was interested in him expanding.

:grimace:
I feel rather perturbed you say this
how much of slaughter hour did you read?

In post 1439, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1437, Titus wrote:

In post 1434, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1358, Pavowski wrote:Ok so Gamma was wagoned before I left, then unwagoned, then wagoned again, and is now slightly less wagoned but still a leading wagon (as of last VC)

That's ... kinda wild

Meanwhile Gamma votes Meuh, Cakez, Aristeia, and now Cakez again

Gamma is almost always cross-voting somebody (though I guess I don't see the timing without digging in deeper). That's interesting.

if a wagon formed on Titus/Isis I might join it
besides that all my suspects are people either voting or who have voted me

Why us two?

What do your reads look like?

I TR everyone else that hasn't voted me (skitter, GL, TUF)
I also don't think all scum are among people who voted me

In post 1431, Titus wrote:

In post 1430, skitter30 wrote:titus how much of the game have you read?

All of it. Did you think I missed something?

In post 1436, the worst wrote:

In post 1429, skitter30 wrote:too out of it to be partnered imo
doesn't know people and doesn't know what's going on, doesn't seem to be getting help wrt how to interact with the forum, etc

i could be wrong but it would be a p convincing act

i saw that argument made earlier in the game and feel like i'd be remiss to put any stock in it tbh

apparently i'm also the only one who also feels like TUF is playing it up?

In post 1443, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1431, Titus wrote:

In post 1430, skitter30 wrote:titus how much of the game have you read?

All of it. Did you think I missed something?

i guess more just that i dont' have a very good sense for what you're thinking this game

In post 1424, Titus wrote:

In post 1352, Gamma Emerald wrote:good song

Gamma, what are your reads?

In post 1441, Titus wrote:Why?