Page 59 of 86
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:17 pm
by Formerfish
↑ Flames682 wrote: ↑ Formerfish wrote:Right, but if you look at the dead and their roles each makes sense within the context of the move they actually have. Mine make sense for my character and make sense in the game as well. I also don't like having to pull this out of you like teeth. It gives me flashbacks to a very similar time in another game where you were scum if I remember correctly.
You don't like me claiming at L-1 is what you're saying.
Is that really what you took away from my post? I think maybe you reread and try again.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:44 pm
by Flames682
↑ Formerfish wrote:Right, but if you look at the dead and their roles each makes sense within the context of the move they actually have. Mine make sense for my character and make sense in the game as well.
Like I said, I didn't write my own flavor. And really if I told you harden would become a treestump you wouldn't believe that either. You also wouldn't believe Psychic somehow creates a neighborhood, cause it's an attack move in the Pokemon games.
↑ Formerfish wrote:I also don't like having to pull this out of you like teeth. It gives me flashbacks to a very similar time in another game where you were scum if I remember correctly.
You don't like me claiming at L-1 is what you're saying.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:04 pm
by Formerfish
I can see why harden would be a treestump, and I can see how psychic could be a type of neighborizer. I can't see how low kick means track, sorry bro I just don't see it making sense to me.
And again I think you are being obtuse by claiming you think I didn't like the claim at l-1. I don't like the fact that you didn't come out and say "I am (character), who is (role), my moves are (move 1) and (move 2 if applicable), here are my actions so far (actions). Questions?" That's what I don't like.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:09 pm
by Flames682
Because I didn't think you would gain shit from flavor unless you were Espeonage.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:27 pm
by Formerfish
Sometimes its not for you to decide what information is useful and what isn't.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:58 pm
by Flames682
well at the fucking time I didn't think it was so i didn't fucking do it. stop trying to give me statements that I can't respond to
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:16 am
by Bert
I see, boon. What bothers me most about pie is he is a voracious reader and yet still hasn't reportedly read the game, when it's hard for him to resist reading games
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:39 am
by Formerfish
Flames are you annoyed? You seem annoyed. I'm not sure why you are so annoyed that you have to start swearing like that. Kinda makes me think you are scum trying to puff up your chest to get me toback off. The situation will be exponentially more entertaining after we get a flip. I can't reveal why right now or the surprise will be ruined.
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:55 am
by Bert
Oh right I forgot about the "neighborhood" with bbt and not mafia making pie less likely to be scum
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:01 am
by Bert
↑ Flames682 wrote:And along with FF I think Seo is lying. Or is saying the truth except he didn't really target BBT
VOTE: Seo
↑ Flames682 wrote:I even had these posts:
↑ Flames682 wrote:
Unless Seo also has the ability Recover then no
I targeted seo N2 and he targeted no one, unless he did indeed have the ability recover like NM did. I have a limited amount of tracks so I did not target anyone N1 (I also had no idea who to target). I will not give out the shots of track that I have.
I would still prefer a vettrock or Boon lynch
What the heck happened with your Seo "he's lying" read?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:01 am
by Bert
Oh I goofed
BBt retracted
VOTE: flames
L-1
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:02 am
by Bert
↑ Boonskiies wrote:Pointing out I could hammer right now, but I'm probably not going to. Time for a boonie read list.
How did you miss that former fish doesn't have a vote
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 am
by Bert
Oh wait I posted yesterday thinking its l-1 too
Anyways I am fine with the flames lynch, Aside from the claim I don't see what's town about him here
And 5 votes on a wagon with 7 available votes is hard enough as is
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:29 am
by Flames682
k
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:32 am
by Flames682
Apparently annoyed = scum. Not doing a full claim because I didn't think flavor mattered at all = scum.
FF making statements that I can't respond to except from a scummy standpoint = not scum.
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:33 am
by Flames682
That last one was sarcasm, btw
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:36 am
by Boonskiies
↑ Bert wrote: ↑ Boonskiies wrote:Pointing out I could hammer right now, but I'm probably not going to. Time for a boonie read list.
How did you miss that former fish doesn't have a vote
I keep forgetting about that. Anywho, it's L-1. On you, Tier.
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:31 am
by Formerfish
↑ Flames682 wrote:Apparently annoyed = scum. Not doing a full claim because I didn't think flavor mattered at all = scum.
FF making statements that I can't respond to except from a scummy standpoint = not scum.
Flames, we are all here because we love you and we want you to be well. You have a problem. This is a misrep intervention. In the past when you have misrepped something I've said it makes me feel angry and disappointed. All I want is for you to comprehend things I say and not try to twist them into something they aren't.
And you know my vote on you was all for show and reactions, I didn't actually have a read on you before, but thanks for changing that. I do have a read on you now. Hang scum bag.
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:48 am
by Bert
What? The vote was all for show? I Would have never guessed
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Kbw is still a shitty and boring wagon. She is town lurking, not scum lurking.
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:
keybladewielder
Everyone knows my stance on this slot, it was a scum push
TierShift
In the game I played where he was scum he played me pretty hard, so he's tentative townread but his scumplay was more based on stroking egos and psychological manipulation, this seems more in line with his straight down the line town play.
Not_Mafia
Obvscum
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Flames682
I've played with Flames quite abut but I can't recall a scum game of his off the top of my head, come to think of it the fact we share a read should be some sort of red flag, my read on him is usually a "I have 0 idea how you actually think this" but there's usually a sincerity behind it and he usualy feel very town when he comes under pressure, in this game he's kinda been a non entity
if its scum scum, putting scumbuddy as nullread would kinda make sense? Well, he knew he was getting lynched here though, I would think. So, he was defending a few townreads hard (keyblade, tiershift). And he had al ot of noncommittal reads anyways
Also, the two posts on Seo 1 hour apart are funny:
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Want lynched BBT
Will lynch Wisdom, Marquis, Seohyun
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:Seohyun
I have 0 recollection of this slot
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:51 am
by Bert
im making myself feel better about a flames lynch.
whenever theres a lone wagon i immediately go oh-wait-something's-wrong although there is no basis in thinking that way
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:01 am
by Seohyun
↑ Bert wrote: ↑ Flames682 wrote:And along with FF I think Seo is lying. Or is saying the truth except he didn't really target BBT
What the heck happened with your Seo "he's lying" read?
Now I'm wondering, why did flames think I targeted someone else besides bbt since he didn't track N1. And if he thought I meant I did it N2 then why would he think I might have targeted someone else if he knew I didn't target anyone N2?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 11:39 am
by Flames682
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:01 pm
by Seohyun
nice answer, very informative, 10/10 etc etc
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:12 pm
by pieguyn
VLA until thursday
currently visiting everyone at CCCP and am currently phonebound; will be able to get to a computer eventually, but I prob can't do much.
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:14 pm
by Flames682
↑ Seohyun wrote:nice answer, very informative, 10/10 etc etc
I think you mean
gr8 m8 i r8 8/8