Page 59 of 61

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:04 pm
by fferyllt
did anyone in sdm townread me?

I still don't know what sakura thought I spied. but given how paranoid I was about eavesdropping it was p ironic.

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:06 pm
by notscience
I think you were swaying me because I didn't really feel interested in lynching you.

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:14 pm
by Katsuki
notscience wrote:I was talking about when we goonsquaded relentless


oh ya im sad that didnt take off. The way relentless pushed me was scummy as fuck

I didnt realize there would be 4 scum. My reads were a mess, with scumreads on feysal relentless and a couple of others. :good:

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:17 pm
by notscience
tbh I had considered the gameplan coming into this game "vig muffincat, if town sheep his reads and vig them all the next few nights"

as a legitimate strategy

I was not pleased with my vig limitation

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:17 pm
by ActionDan
That was fun to watch.

The good thing is that there was a wholesome scum:town ratio in a fakegod game

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:18 pm
by FakeGod
dan

2:15 mountainous is scum sided

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:20 pm
by The_Relentless
notscience wrote:I want to proudly say we got a scumfuck lolwagoned for voting me

yeah uh I hope the way that turned out (everybody townreading me for bad reasons) convinces you to never handle a reaction test wagon like that again

Kats in the QT wrote:@FG: Please tell me there is no kondi alt in this game. If relentless is, I am replacing out. I'm not gonna deal with this shit 2 games in a row.

I'm not kondi or any MS player, and I didn't even mean to push you actually, I was just being silly and hoping I'd goad you into posting since you hadn't really been around*. I would not actually randomly suicide bomb you! Sorry if it came off wrong or if the suicide bomb subject was touchier than I assumed.

*or at least I was pretending I was doing that I guess. I was scum, but sometimes my intent blurs for me as I doublethink when mafia. basically that's what I'd have said I was doing if somebody asked

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:21 pm
by notscience
Nope

Will likely do it again

was 99% dickwaggling tbh

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:24 pm
by The_Relentless
kk well I guess it's not my problem if you want to stay bad B)

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:25 pm
by notscience
Bad enough you guys had to take me out day 1 with me doing fuckall

:)

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:26 pm
by The_Relentless
I should probably clarify I don't have a problem with reaction test wagons cuz I do them too, I just think trying to analyze my reaction here was really stupid because I was clearly under no actual threat of being lynched. regardless of alignment I'm just going to be dumbfounded.

I think wagons like that are best analyzing the fall-out; how the other players react to them.

notscience wrote:Bad enough you guys had to take me out day 1 with me doing fuckall

:)

my complaint about UPick meta is in my ISO

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:27 pm
by Katsuki
notscience wrote:tbh I had considered the gameplan coming into this game "vig muffincat, if town sheep his reads and vig them all the next few nights"

as a legitimate strategy

I was not pleased with my vig limitation


This only worked last time because I had a neighbor. >.>

Also my early reads were so off lol

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:28 pm
by ActionDan
FakeGod wrote:dan

2:15 mountainous is scum sided


Sure I'll take your word for it (which I guess is based on that equation) but in a mechanically complicated game (regardless of the power of each side) it feels a lot better the higher the ratio for the scum-side whilst the difference as town (even though they don't know what it is) doesn't matter that much.

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:31 pm
by The_Relentless
Dan why didn't you join the game? I could have been playing with SIX ActionDans

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:31 pm
by Katsuki
p.s. pls dont vig me ever thx

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:33 pm
by notscience
p.p.s. pls be more sheepable in the future thx

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:34 pm
by ActionDan
The_Relentless wrote:Dan why didn't you join the game? I could have been playing with SIX ActionDans


I haven't been able to trust myself to play a mafia game recently in the last few months. But then again I generally don't have a problem if I play 1 at a time

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:34 pm
by zMuffinMan
3:1 is a good ratio for an *actual* nightless game - lack of "traditional" scum kill hardly matters when, even after a lynch on the scum player with the NK was about to happen, he scum claimed and lived to n3...

I thought the scum team might have super strong voting mechanics / governor stuff in place of the night kill - I wasn't expecting them to basically have unlimited day and night vig powers :/

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:34 pm
by Katsuki
Didn't I tell you, KILL EVERYTHING?

You need to sheep better in the future thx

p-edit: STOP INTERRUPTING DAN

p-edit2: YOU TOO MUFFIN

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:35 pm
by FakeGod
then let's do a makeup game

touhou upick 4.5

i'll allow pc-98 characters and not do stupid shit

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:36 pm
by notscience
I mean

if we got to night 9 and forced EVERYONE to burn all their cards

I would have e z p z

pedit-

DIBS ON HECATIA

SUCK IT SAKURA

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:36 pm
by zMuffinMan
btw cupcake, I think, of the reads you posted in game, not a single one of them was incorrect

Kudos for that

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:38 pm
by notscience
Also first prein

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:38 pm
by zMuffinMan
Wait scratch that you actually gave a read and it was a not-scum read on gaiden

So actually 100% wrong on reads you posted in game

For shame, cupcake

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:39 pm
by Katsuki
zMuffinMan wrote:btw cupcake, I think, of the reads you posted in game, not a single one of them was incorrect

Kudos for that


Think my votes were Relentless and BORKBORK?

Ya now that you mention it my in-thread reads wern't bad.

the way BORKBORK responded to my BORKBORK'ing was really scummy (that yar or whatever)