Mafiascum.net

And mine is on texcat

In post 1369, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1364, texcat wrote:I don't believe the claim, but I didn't Zyf' s claim either. The 2 shot part of it is just too convenient.

Doubtcast - BUT (fence sitting like a boss) - MORE Doubtcast.

I guess I don't understand what doubtcast means.

I thought it was talking bad about someone without voting them or actually calling them scum. Not what I was doing. Transcend's claim is a pack of lies. Is that still doubtcasting?

I'm pretty sure I do know what fence sitting is. I've never had any other opinion about Zyf's claim. It was bad. I didn't like it. I have never been on the fence about it.

In post 1451, texcat wrote:

In post 1369, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1364, texcat wrote:I don't believe the claim, but I didn't Zyf' s claim either. The 2 shot part of it is just too convenient.

Doubtcast - BUT (fence sitting like a boss) - MORE Doubtcast.

I guess I don't understand what doubtcast means.

I thought it was talking bad about someone without voting them or actually calling them scum. Not what I was doing. Transcend's claim is a pack of lies. Is that still doubtcasting?

I'm pretty sure I do know what fence sitting is. I've never had any other opinion about Zyf's claim. It was bad. I didn't like it. I have never been on the fence about it.

Doubtcasting is expressing doubt on something or someone.
You express doubt on transcend's claim but then by saying "but I didn't zyf's claim either" you are weakening how much doubt you feel about transcend's claim, therefore moving towards a fence sitty position of "Well I don't like his claim but I didn't like zyf's claim so idk" but then after fence sitting you doubt cast more by saying the 2-shot is too convenient.

yeah that's not a case

yes it is..?

I explained why a ton of texcat's posts are obvscum and you're just gonna be like "nope daz not a case"
what is it then?

In post 1453, TierShift wrote:yeah that's not a case

Do you have any cases to share?

picking up prod. I was without internet for a couple of days.

I'm back, going to catch up on these last 10 pages

no my vote is fine where it is

Mod spreadsheet error, 1.11 is now fixed, my apologies.

My vote also looks good.

In post 1461, gerryoat wrote:My vote also looks good.

Your vote is the sole vote on Algebra. What looks good about it?

Don't you have anything to say about the current wagons? Or the claims that have been made?

In post 1334, Transcend wrote:K welp. You fucked yourselves.

I hard claim 2-shot doctor.

You guys are pretty fucked now. But you're super fucked if you lynch me and lose your protection source. Don't run people up for no reason shitbags. Now, we're lynching either saru, texcat, or xkfyu. Capiche?

Can people stop claiming unless you're at L-1 and there is a formal request made. This is getting beyond ridiculous. I didn't think this was a newbie game. Also FWIW, definitely not treating this claim as confirmed, but Transcend wasn't really on my scumlist in the first place, so he's fine.

In post 1401, BlackStar wrote:

In post 1399, Dwlee99 wrote:2-shot doc is possible with a bp.

It sounds unbalanced as hell

Can't talk about balance without full knowledge of setup.

I'm still happy where my vote is at. Be back later with a bit more.

Don't have much to say I did all I could to get my scumreads lynched I understand why tex has votes still think it's wrong.

Sigh

VOTE: Transcend
Not buying the claim

: (

Um...you don't lynch claimed doctor's. You just don't.

In post 1468, Xkfyu wrote:Um...you don't lynch claimed doctor's. You just don't.

BP + Doctor same set up? Nope

And don't think you a seasoned player like Transcend with that info in mind would use that same logic against everyone cause I know he would and did

In post 1469, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:

In post 1468, Xkfyu wrote:Um...you don't lynch claimed doctor's. You just don't.

BP + Doctor same set up? Nope

And don't think you a seasoned player like Transcend with that info in mind would use that same logic against everyone cause I know he would and did

Someone linked a game with a 2shot tracker 1shot doc JOAT and a 1shot bulletproof and other power roles against a goon goon 1shot strongman

After my last game(the one that Dwlee modded), it'd be silly for me to say that town having too much power is out of the question. I also suck at setup spec, so I'm not even going to try. I don't understand why Transcend claimed so early, like seriously, you had like 3 votes on you or something. That's just dumb as fuck.

Anyways, I really don't like the case on Texcat. It seems forced. From my count, Transcend and Texcat both have 4 votes on them, so some resemblance of a team is forming on both sides. I'm going to look back at the VCs and read some other stuff before I decide who to vote.

Town didnt have too much power in my game. Scum just used theirs poorly when they bussed their doctor without a claim and the vigilante shot the goon, leaving it 9 - 1 day two with the mafia tracker not being able to do anything.
Anyway texcat is definitely scum. All their posts scream it, when I made a case against them they focused on one part of it to try to discredit my case while OMGUSing and ignoring the rest. When unsucessful they ignored everything from my case and continued bad posting.

Ugh does Town-Transcend really come in and claim at the point he did, even after we all agreed that Zyf's claim was at a horrible?

Do you really want to take the risk of lunching the doctor?