Page 59 of 86
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:39 pm
by pisskop
Chen or luv is my pick.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:43 pm
by pisskop
yea, Im going to give skitter the benefit of the doubt today.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:44 pm
by pisskop
Chen, what are your 'raisins' for believing my claim? Thats a hard defense youve picked up and dropped and repeated.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:49 pm
by pisskop
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:52 pm
by chennisden
In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Chen, what are your 'raisins' for believing my claim? Thats a hard defense youve picked up and dropped and repeated.
Not gonna dilly dally anymore.
I am a PR
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:53 pm
by chennisden
We need a lunch and it's not gonna be on me.
Pisskop if you're legit the doc DO NOT protect me
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:53 pm
by pisskop
okay?
vote luv
VOTE: LUV
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:54 pm
by chennisden
VOTE: skitter
You've been deliberately dragging me out.
My "reason" is because I'm macho. So that's why I initially believe the claim.
Also I believe it's likely there's an rb for scum
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:55 pm
by chennisden
I was planning to do things to skitter but I think with recent play this gets scum.
Flash wagon go go go!
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:56 pm
by chennisden
Also as for the incongruencies; I play very different as certain PR
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:00 pm
by skitter30
In post 1457, chennisden wrote:VOTE: skitter
You've been deliberately dragging me out.
My "reason" is because I'm macho. So that's why I initially believe the claim.
Also I believe it's likely there's an rb for scum
It was really fucking obvious you were a pr (or informed or ehatever)
I did not in any way ask or insinuate that you ought to be claiming here, what i said was that it was hypocrotical of you to say that i shouldnt push pk because of reasoms while you were pushing him
How on earth was i deliberately dragging you out or pressuring you to claim ....
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:04 pm
by chennisden
Yes it was
That's why I claimed
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:08 pm
by chennisden
In post 1448, skitter30 wrote:You're acting like i dont have a dayplay reason to push pisskop ...
You need to explain why it's ok for you to push pisskop despite your reasons but its problemativ when i do so
Did you think that it's a good idea to push the less scummy of the two PRs?
I think I've said that I'd stop defending pisskop not only to gauge his reactions but also other people's
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:14 pm
by skitter30
I thought u were informed, and i dont have a problem pushing informed (esp v doc ... doc is more important than informed)
And no, you didnt say that; i think it's kinda hypocritical and revisionist of you
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:17 pm
by chennisden
In post 1033, chennisden wrote:ive seen a lot of doc lynches go through despite the doc being obviously legit. but im not going to tell people to stop touching pisskop's slot because this slot is something that NEEDS to be touched.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:17 pm
by chennisden
No?
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:19 pm
by skitter30
? i don't get what you're trying to say or how that demonstrtes what you said earlier
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:20 pm
by chennisden
I said that I'd stop defending pisskop so he could be sorted
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:21 pm
by skitter30
that's not at all how i read that, to me that reads: pisskop is scummy so i'm going to stop defending him
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:22 pm
by chennisden
In post 941, Dannflor wrote:I mean, in a game of this size, if we're saying Cinnamon is scum
I think if he senses he might be lynched, he's gonna want to make his partner look as good as possible as he goes down, which basically just leaves [chennis, skitter, exilon]
and I think skitter's interactions here look the worst
I could be getting in too deep on the pre flip associatives though
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:22 pm
by skitter30
In post 1460, skitter30 wrote:How on earth was i deliberately dragging you out or pressuring you to claim ....
where did i do this
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:23 pm
by skitter30
In post 1469, chennisden wrote: In post 941, Dannflor wrote:I mean, in a game of this size, if we're saying Cinnamon is scum
I think if he senses he might be lynched, he's gonna want to make his partner look as good as possible as he goes down, which basically just leaves [chennis, skitter, exilon]
and I think skitter's interactions here look the worst
I could be getting in too deep on the pre flip associatives though
what does this have to do with the convo we're having either
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:23 pm
by chennisden
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:23 pm
by skitter30
i don't understand this converstaion like at all
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:24 pm
by chennisden
In post 1471, skitter30 wrote: In post 1469, chennisden wrote: In post 941, Dannflor wrote:I mean, in a game of this size, if we're saying Cinnamon is scum
I think if he senses he might be lynched, he's gonna want to make his partner look as good as possible as he goes down, which basically just leaves [chennis, skitter, exilon]
and I think skitter's interactions here look the worst
I could be getting in too deep on the pre flip associatives though
what does this have to do with the convo we're having either
this isn't a response
I'm just dumping this here because
Dann has good reads
Dann is towny
This is especially relevant