Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:53 pm
you're going to wait foreverIn post 899, Unapologetically Foxy wrote:I'm still waiting on Pine's opinions on things
you're going to wait foreverIn post 899, Unapologetically Foxy wrote:I'm still waiting on Pine's opinions on things
In post 1447, Imperium wrote:yesIn post 847, Mikoto and Kuroko wrote:Do you think i am wrong? Question @everyone actually, not just cappy.
is the main thrust of your case that alyssa should be correctly townreading you?
have you seen my posts complaining about your posting? do you have an opinion on them?
In post 1448, Imperium wrote:but wouldn't it be nice to share info with other people long before we're blasted!!!!!!In post 1445, Black Hole Defection wrote:Titus, I'd say you should give your walkie talkie to a player you can share CO Power information with.
CO Imperium is not the best choice, you can't share information with them very long before they're blasted.
Neither of us sign our posts because signing is for suckers
I talked about this already but basically I feel scum would be invested in the currency stuff more in order to use it to their advantage. I personally am not that into it as town so I feel it shows another likely town mindset.In post 1296, Imperium wrote:-snip-
I missed this post originally, but yeah why is this a town post? Because quite frankly we should be keeping track of this stuff and care about it. In marketplace mafia, scum are always at an advantage when town doesn't hold people accountable or keep track of these things.
I remember games with you guys and you make posts like that one all the time regardless of alignment no? Very casual.In post 1309, Imperium wrote:Can you expand on this because it still doesn't make sense to me.
This was not my intention here btw; sorry for any confusion caused. I really developed my SB read independently of Ircher and just wanted to express it.In post 1310, Black Hole Defection wrote:Wow it looks you said 34%, and SirCakez said 0%, I got punk'd! I don't dig putting the blame on me for assuming that when CO Hawke asked you a question and CO SirCakez answered it, knowing you don't agree, not taking the chance to say why you're wrong, and then drops his shortened callsign. That's also as close as it gets to speaking for you.
I dislike this post but I can't really explain why. It just irks me??? :/In post 1341, Spiffybringer wrote:MariaR you are playing a spectacular game so far keep up the good work
~Spiffy
Neither one of us sign because neither one of us would really remember to anyway and really signing doesn't mean anything. If you can't tell the difference between users it doesn't really do anything for you meta wise. If you can't tell the difference between us, then you can't properly meta either head so it wouldn't matter whom is whom, right? For us, with the exception of maybe some short joking posts, we're super easy to tell apart or we should be we don't post anything alike.
In post 1460, Imperium wrote:Neither one of us sign because neither one of us would really remember to anyway and really signing doesn't mean anything. If you can't tell the difference between users it doesn't really do anything for you meta wise. If you can't tell the difference between us, then you can't properly meta either head so it wouldn't matter whom is whom, right? For us, with the exception of maybe some short joking posts, we're super easy to tell apart or we should be we don't post anything alike.
But if it helps for the rest of the night until I fall asleep it will be Tammy since nacho's went to sleep.
It was plain curiosity, I don't know either of you before this game.In post 1460, Imperium wrote:Neither one of us sign because neither one of us would really remember to anyway and really signing doesn't mean anything. If you can't tell the difference between users it doesn't really do anything for you meta wise. If you can't tell the difference between us, then you can't properly meta either head so it wouldn't matter whom is whom, right? For us, with the exception of maybe some short joking posts, we're super easy to tell apart or we should be we don't post anything alike.
But if it helps for the rest of the night until I fall asleep it will be Tammy since nacho's went to sleep.
I challenge you sir to a duel. At least people can understand my posts or our posts whomever they may beIn post 1462, Black Hole Defection wrote:In post 1460, Imperium wrote:Neither one of us sign because neither one of us would really remember to anyway and really signing doesn't mean anything. If you can't tell the difference between users it doesn't really do anything for you meta wise. If you can't tell the difference between us, then you can't properly meta either head so it wouldn't matter whom is whom, right? For us, with the exception of maybe some short joking posts, we're super easy to tell apart or we should be we don't post anything alike.
But if it helps for the rest of the night until I fall asleep it will be Tammy since nacho's went to sleep.Miss
I am very poor at ascertaining the identity of COs, but still glean some benefit from understanding the identity of the user. You are correct it is less. You extrapolate beyond the range of data to say it is nothing, Jugger.
Two hypothetical COs who formed a tag team in their very first game could still conceal their allegiance by not signing their posts, because rapid plan changes from the same CO are Black Hole mobilization and differing orders from different COs aren't always, and as Black Hole they would wish to conceal the two. It may very well be the case my dialogue with CO SirCakez and CO Ircher becomes exactly an example of that.
Use your callsign, or admit it is a tradeoff that harms Orange Star you're willfully making out of a laziness beyond even mine.
oh then winding posts with no conclusion, like someone lost in the woods - tammyIn post 1466, Cappy wrote:It was plain curiosity, I don't know either of you before this game.In post 1460, Imperium wrote:Neither one of us sign because neither one of us would really remember to anyway and really signing doesn't mean anything. If you can't tell the difference between users it doesn't really do anything for you meta wise. If you can't tell the difference between us, then you can't properly meta either head so it wouldn't matter whom is whom, right? For us, with the exception of maybe some short joking posts, we're super easy to tell apart or we should be we don't post anything alike.
But if it helps for the rest of the night until I fall asleep it will be Tammy since nacho's went to sleep.
- Silver Bullet
spiffeh posts like this is why I'm confused. I don't understand. I don't get it. Is she writing in her diary about her day at scum here which would be weird but i like don't believe in the oh you claimed scum you're scum tell which I think never made it's way to this site but was all the rage at others for a while, but or is she taking about some previous game, is she purposefully being confusing because baiting is so fun or what I just don't know and I promised myself a long time ago these are the questions I'd stop asking because they give me a headache.In post 737, Despair Night wrote:No, I'd take this as a learning experience with Junko because she said she would help me with my scum game. Creating a dichotomy right now between how I'm posting and how she'll be posting because she's good with tone, it would only attract more scum leans on me and we probably get lynched in the end.
Tbf I'm confident if I get pushed by someone I'll cry like a baby and the wagon shifts on to like...gb maybe and then we go into D2 ignoring me and then I attempt to solve being pissed for attracting scum leans.
I was open wolfing, wasn't even trying. I was pushing things to get town read if anything, I remember having like 5 scum leans and posting in my scum PT that they shouldn't listen to me because my scumreads were all likely wrong, which they were.
~som
In post 1471, Imperium wrote:spiffeh posts like this is why I'm confused. I don't understand. I don't get it. Is she writing in her diary about her day at scum here which would be weird but i like don't believe in the oh you claimed scum you're scum tell which I think never made it's way to this site but was all the rage at others for a while, but or is she taking about some previous game, is she purposefully being confusing because baiting is so fun or what I just don't know and I promised myself a long time ago these are the questions I'd stop asking because they give me a headache.In post 737, Despair Night wrote:No, I'd take this as a learning experience with Junko because she said she would help me with my scum game. Creating a dichotomy right now between how I'm posting and how she'll be posting because she's good with tone, it would only attract more scum leans on me and we probably get lynched in the end.
Tbf I'm confident if I get pushed by someone I'll cry like a baby and the wagon shifts on to like...gb maybe and then we go into D2 ignoring me and then I attempt to solve being pissed for attracting scum leans.
I was open wolfing, wasn't even trying. I was pushing things to get town read if anything, I remember having like 5 scum leans and posting in my scum PT that they shouldn't listen to me because my scumreads were all likely wrong, which they were.
~som
I don't understand what you are asking me here or how it relates to the post you quoted from me.In post 1310, Black Hole Defection wrote:Spoiler: BlakeI take it you read logs a second time, but not all of them. How do you choose which ones to reread?
Do you read logs from COs who the intel shows should be very easy to understand?
I generally read everything, or don't read any. I wonder if I could learn from your methods, in this battle and future ones too. I dig anything that's a good way to be lazy. Work harder not smarter!