Mafiascum.net

A lot of moments from this claim.

I'm wifoming on redtea.
That's super scummy, but would mafia redtea admit to this if he was scum?
But why wouldn't he?
wut

Maybe a tracker in the set up? To make things confusing.

I don't know what to think

In post 1445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1438, redtea wrote:#1025, in relation to Norwee's obvious softclaim. Wasn't gonna elaborate unless we claimed today/Dunnstral was a gift-giving mod lolol

That explains your reaction. So makes me thing you're not joking about your ability. Not sure if scum wouldn't theoretically have an exact copy of my role except mafia aligned tho.

This is what I'm thinking, with the possibility of a safeclaim.

Clarified, altered #1427, on scumhunting:

In post 1427, redtea wrote: maf with too much corruption might be extra pushy to get others to eliminate, if they can't risk a hammer
a maf with too much corruption might be more likely to join a wagon early (so as to not be left one vote on a wagon short because they can't hammer)
seemed like it could be useful.

I think we both need sleep honestly

I just woke up from a good night's sleep and it's a beautiful morning here in the land of Norway.

In post 1454, redtea wrote:

In post 1445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1438, redtea wrote:#1025, in relation to Norwee's obvious softclaim. Wasn't gonna elaborate unless we claimed today/Dunnstral was a gift-giving mod lolol

That explains your reaction. So makes me thing you're not joking about your ability. Not sure if scum wouldn't theoretically have an exact copy of my role except mafia aligned tho.

This is what I'm thinking, with the possibility of a safeclaim.

Clarified, altered #1427, on scumhunting:

In post 1427, redtea wrote: maf with too much corruption might be extra pushy to get others to eliminate, if they can't risk a hammer
a maf with too much corruption might be more likely to join a wagon early (so as to not be left one vote on a wagon short because they can't hammer)
seemed like it could be useful.

I think we both need sleep honestly

Okay. With that clarification, it actually makes sense why you might decide to hold onto an action

I also like your explanation of what mafia might wanna do with hopping on trains early, makes sense with Bell's claim as a mini vig of types, your reasoning kinda clicks

Okay, I'm sleeping on this. lol.

I'm going to crawl into bed and stare at the ceiling for hours

good I was able to make some sense.
After we ended up with 2 deaths overnight as well as some more thinking, I do think I should've targeted. Like. Anyone.
'Cause we uh don't know how, exactly, the nk mechanics might work. If it's like "instant grant 3 corruption", Atonement could be a possible life-saving role.

Plus, I'm sure I would've gotten some good enough reads to target someone by N2 and- like I don't think my idea would've come together.
Perhaps if this game ends up lasting a good amount of days.


To all a good night.

In post 1459, redtea wrote:good I was able to make some sense.
After we ended up with 2 deaths overnight as well as some more thinking, I do think I should've targeted. Like. Anyone.
'Cause we uh don't know how, exactly, the nk mechanics might work. If it's like "instant grant 3 corruption", Atonement could be a possible life-saving role.

Plus, I'm sure I would've gotten some good enough reads to target someone by N2 and- like I don't think my idea would've come together.
Perhaps if this game ends up lasting a good amount of days.


To all a good night.

I have had similar thoughts about nk's. Thanks for sharing

Checking in - VT.

@Clerics: does your role PM say "a" Cleric, or "the" Cleric?

We still haven't accounted for the S_S kill, right?

-Dumbass

Let's answer d&d at the same time

In post 1462, redtea wrote:

@Norwegianboy

Let's answer d&d at the same time

How do we do that?

You can't answer at the same time, it's impossible because of P-edit preventing it.

Anyway, it says "a cleric" to me.

I slept on it. All I got was a dream that ants were swarming on my bed and before I was all the way awake I was already standing up on my bed like a third grader at his first sleep over.

In post 1465, Bell wrote:I slept on it. All I got was a dream that ants were swarming on my bed and before I was all the way awake I was already standing up on my bed like a third grader at his first sleep over.

It was probably a subliminal message from your own conciousness sensing there is one deceiving us.
Someone like Porkens.

Androgybee, what's the name of your role? I do not understand why you would refuse to say this.

I don't find the doubled cleric claim to be inherently scummy, imo; I think they can both be town

I think that androgybee has managed to claim in just about the scummiest way possible but gun-to-head I'd say they're probably town? But they certainly aren't helping things

I think it's possible that people got corrupted last night but didn't know it - iirc the OP says that people will only be alerted to a *net* corruption change. IE if their corruption gains and losses cancel each other out, they won't be alerted. like a +1 corruption and -1 corruption won't be announced since there's no net change.

So I don't think it's possible to fully track all of the corruption getting passed about.

Nothing about this massclaim has made me want to vote outside of porkens/Star

- Dumber

In post 1467, Dunnstral wrote:androgybee (2): Porkens, NorwegianboyEE

EWWW, i'm on the same wagon as Porkens.
VOTE: Porkens

UNVOTE: NEE
I'm gonna do it
VOTE: BananaCucho

In post 1471, Jackel98 wrote:UNVOTE: NEE
I'm gonna do it
VOTE: BananaCucho

lol

In post 1472, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 1471, Jackel98 wrote:UNVOTE: NEE
I'm gonna do it
VOTE: BananaCucho

lol

lmfao