Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 9:59 am
And Titus and nos have a very different thing going on. Titus is grouping her and Nos together.
I need to catch up at which point I intend to vote for you, but if that wagon won't work I would compromise on Gypyx.In post 1384, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also gypyx has stated a scumread on titus but wont actually vote there.In post 1383, Pickaxe Pete wrote:3 days to deadline and you go off on a vanity wagon Nos? That may be the first actual scummy thing I've seen you do.
so youre saying titus literally gives up and stops continuing, and you instead say that im giving people a pass?In post 1445, Glitch wrote:This makes so much sense and makes me SR Taylor all the more as the primary voice relieving the pressure for scum to contribute.In post 1373, Titus wrote:I am old enough to have seen this pattern play out before.In post 1372, Noraa wrote:why the defeatism?
People won't see Mara avoiding the thread as scummy. They need more content. So he continues avoiding the thread, knowing he'll get defended for it. He won't be providing content anytime soon.
When "lurker" slots show up, like Eddie and Nos, they get wagoned for showing up. So why would Mara? It's anti-scum for him to show.
I highlight this pattern. I get scumread. There's been enough focus on me/nos/dgb which is the real townblock this game.
I can't carry a town that punishes effort.
this is possible, but nos is reciprocating.In post 1450, Noraa wrote:And Titus and nos have a very different thing going on. Titus is grouping her and Nos together.
feel free to vote me, but before you do please read and respond to my responses to you.In post 1453, Glitch wrote:I need to catch up at which point I intend to vote for you, but if that wagon won't work I would compromise on Gypyx.In post 1384, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also gypyx has stated a scumread on titus but wont actually vote there.In post 1383, Pickaxe Pete wrote:3 days to deadline and you go off on a vanity wagon Nos? That may be the first actual scummy thing I've seen you do.
In post 1393, Titus wrote:There are no PRs in this setup. Glitch just towntold. Get off of him, even if it's onto me.In post 1391, Glitch wrote:No ideas. I received no information upon replacing in other than my role PM. Good clarification at the end or I would have thought you were PR hunting.In post 1260, Gypyx wrote:Also Glitch, you have any idea why Eddie (the slot you replaced in) has asked the entire playerlist who would they shoot if they had a gun? (I'm wondering if there is trial stuff basically)
I am sick of getting sealioned.
Of course, I'm in the process of catching up right now and I'm getting close to being caught up. That's why I said I intended to do it when I catch up, and didn't vote right then and there.In post 1456, Tayl0r Swift wrote:feel free to vote me, but before you do please read and respond to my responses to you.In post 1453, Glitch wrote:I need to catch up at which point I intend to vote for you, but if that wagon won't work I would compromise on Gypyx.In post 1384, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also gypyx has stated a scumread on titus but wont actually vote there.In post 1383, Pickaxe Pete wrote:3 days to deadline and you go off on a vanity wagon Nos? That may be the first actual scummy thing I've seen you do.
Can you please clarify this? I don't understand what you're referring to when you say I "knew what you were referring to?" Sorry I know that's a confusing question I just don't understand what you're saying in this post.In post 1395, Noraa wrote:And the fact that glitch specifically said he got nothing else and knew what you were referring to is definitely concerning
hmm DGB clinging onto this SR on me that glitch omgused is interesting. glitch immediately accepting Taylor and fidgets terrible reasoning and not pushing me anymore is strange as well.In post 1452, DrippingGoofball wrote:Noraa is meta'ing herself and no one cares.
go ask ur buddies in the pt.In post 1459, Glitch wrote:Can you please clarify this? I don't understand what you're referring to when you say I "knew what you were referring to?" Sorry I know that's a confusing question I just don't understand what you're saying in this post.In post 1395, Noraa wrote:And the fact that glitch specifically said he got nothing else and knew what you were referring to is definitely concerning
I'm not trying to compete for the newb medal; you can have it if you want it so bad. I joined in 2015 and then promptly disappeared only to come back this year. I'm good at playing scum but a freaking suck at town. My last game was a large and I singlehandedly lost (to Titus) as the swing vote in lylo. I'm not that good at scum hunting but that's why I'm trying to get better and pinning people with so many questions. That doesn't mean I don't recognize newbish behavior when I see it though.In post 1404, Noraa wrote:Also with a 2015 join date you want to tell me ur as much of a noob as me. uh. ok then.
My read on Pete has swung full circle and he's a TR for me based on his posts so far. I should probably ISO him before I just locktown him for a while but I'm still catching up. I'm leaning townPete and scumTaylor at the moment.In post 1406, Titus wrote:I concur about that. Honestly, I want Taylor to be scum but I was probably wrong day 1 and Pete's likely scum.In post 1405, Glitch wrote:Same page as Taylor and Gypyx. I'll revise my statement. There must be at least one town, probably two town, between Taylor, Gypyx, and Pete because scum wouldn't all lay off my slot in unison like that. That would be risky and sketchy IMO.In post 1266, Pickaxe Pete wrote:Glitch, though, appears to be redeeming that slot.
this is all fine, it just sounds like youve made up your mind, but i responded to the things you accuse me of ignoring etc.In post 1458, Glitch wrote: Of course, I'm in the process of catching up right now and I'm getting close to being caught up. That's why I said I intended to do it when I catch up, and didn't vote right then and there.
Perhaps not but it's moreso about the public statement of redemption of the Eddie slot that everyone has been so vocal about since I replaced in. I didn't think that scum would make public statements like that but now being caught up and seeing so many people have all concurred scum could easily have slid in there somewhere.In post 1407, Gypyx wrote:Did I scumread you? I think you're mixing names thereIn post 1399, Glitch wrote:In post 1261, Gypyx wrote:Anyways pretty sure glitch is town for the nos voteWould organized scum who were pushing and targeting my slot before I replaced in, both jump from SR'ing me to TR'ing me back to back in the public thread? No.In post 1262, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i had really convinced myself that eddie was scum, but im definitely getting townpings from glitch here i think.
There is at least one town between Taylor and Gypyx.
i mean i dont know if i see a DBG and titus pairing, but i definitely see titus and glitch. why do you think dgb is scum?In post 1465, Noraa wrote:I said I didnt like her play earlier. Rn my mind is kinda occupied with these two and I don't think titus fits into the last slot.
nooooooooIn post 1468, Noraa wrote:Taylor next round that I roll scum when ur town, imma wreck u for not telling me my town tells today ୧༼✿ ͡◕ д ◕͡ ༽୨
I keep grudges >:(
It's important because I want to understand what point you were trying to make. I know you weren't the one who asked. You answered. You made a statement about inconsistent play and I want to know what that looks like to you.In post 1410, Noraa wrote:I wasn't the one that asked about inconsistent play. someone else asked me and I answered. why is it important?
That's fine, I really don't feel like I'm in the witness box being questioned by you. You've demonstrated your own inability here and if you don't see the scumhunting, sorting, and solving that I've clearly been doing since the moment I replaced in, I don't see the value in pointing it out especially considering the fact that you're going to death tunnel me until I die or Taylor tells you to stop. I won't change your mind, and frankly, I don't need to.In post 1410, Noraa wrote:I see zero solving from u.
I'm trying to sort between whether I'm SRing her slot, want to PL her slot, or if I'm just feeling like voting for her because I feel OMGUSy and she's ruffled my feathers just a bit. Maybe I'll vote her because of all the things put together. Let me finish out the evaluation of TS and then I'll come back around to this.In post 1412, DrippingGoofball wrote:I would get behind that before I would get on a Titus wagon.In post 1400, Glitch wrote:Noraa: I'm just gonna do what Taylor says, I'm not actually going to read anyone myself
Also Noraa: Omg Glitch is scum because he isn't reading me
Might policy lynch this tbh
Not as policy. But as scum. Noraa comes off as scum trying to mimic and seduce at once someone she knows is town.
VOTE: Noraa