Mafiascum.net

but ya uh
kinda don't like flea's vote history
seems like opportunism to me.

In post 1447, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: titus

the reck endorsement all i needed

can't wait for that townflip and also full mech reveal postgame so you can eat your words and worship me like the idiot savant i am

are you TMIing that I'm green bro

me thinks titus flips green

In post 1450, Alisae wrote:but ya uh
kinda don't like flea's vote history
seems like opportunism to me.

Fair. ✧♡(◕‿◕✿)

In post 1451, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1447, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: titus

the reck endorsement all i needed

can't wait for that townflip and also full mech reveal postgame so you can eat your words and worship me like the idiot savant i am

I don't have a worship kaomoji... I am disappoint.

In post 1452, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are you TMIing that I'm green bro

i am saying i believe titus is going to flip town but nice try

In post 1456, xRECKONERx wrote:i am saying i believe titus is going to flip town but nice try

It implies Pooky is town too and not scum intentionally trying to mislead you

In post 1456, xRECKONERx wrote:i am saying i believe titus is going to flip town but nice try

i wouldnt be eating my words if im red

but thanks for TMIing to everyone that I'm green bro

VOTE: Reck

This wagon feels gross now. /:

UNVOTE:

That's exactly what I was gunna say

Flea, what was your gut feeling on Titus before you reread her ISO and made your big wall?

In post 1461, MURDERCAT wrote:That's exactly what I was gunna say

Yeah but it's only towny when Bell says it.

Aw but I was waiting for Bell to comment on it

I should get half credit at least

In post 1446, xRECKONERx wrote:hmmm i had townvibes from titus so these recent votes are highly suspect

Anything more substantial than vibes?

Can we properly resolve the no eliminate/eliminate conflict now.
It's up in the air and I think it's effecting how people are responding to and applying pressure. Resolution one way or another would help.

I'm personally against it because it seems -EV, but I don't disagree with murder that going to locations and giving people a chance at playing in them at least once might be more fun.

In post 1464, MURDERCAT wrote:Aw but I was waiting for Bell to comment on it

In post 1465, MURDERCAT wrote:I should get half credit at least

Plz, don't meta manipulate me by reminding me that you did that in dc.

Anyway it seems like we are going to elim today, I am happy enough with the comp of the Blitzo wagon compared to Titus and I think Blitzo has things that are actively kind of scummy so if we want to try to shoot the scum then fine. But I think there's good reasons to think that tasks are viable and miselims hurt us more than usual for that reason, so if it were up to me I would no elim.

In post 1462, Akarin wrote:Flea, what was your gut feeling on Titus before you reread her ISO and made your big wall?

Town Leaning.
I went in wanting to confirm my read and try and see what others were seeing that made her suspicious.

It seems like a lot of tasks only take 1 day phase to complete. So if we have the maximum number of town players on Day 2, we get 1 more task done total.

I guess actually eliminating someone isn't so bad, I think it's much better than not claiming, which loses us a task completion.

I still see a lot of people asserting that a task victory is impossible with no reasoning other than "feels like it should be" often while saying that TSQ wouldn't design a game poorly (in which case, why have task victory in the rules if it's basically impossible)

VOTE: Flea

Your words don't match your spew

The Shea is a good mod argument should suggest that tasks are a well balanced win con that is both possible and not breakable by mass claim.

In post 1473, MURDERCAT wrote:The Shea is a good mod argument should suggest that tasks are a well balanced win con that is both possible and not breakable by mass claim.

Why do people keep equating "gaining the most advantage from" with "breakable"?