Mafiascum.net

I'm like 85% Dann is town

70% Farren

30% you

20% red

... probably. That way of measuring doesnt even really make sense but you get the idea

omg mt thinks there are 205% townies in this game

getther

In post 1449, Morning Tweet wrote:Also fun fact, never been accused of a scumslip as scum, but I'm about 1/2 as town. So you've added to that statistic nicely

Also also, you're going to need to do better than scumreading me for viewing the gamestate through the lense of another player being town and calling it a "scumslip"

What about the second time then?

If I'm correct that Dann is town then redtea's behaviour yesterday is indicative of scum trying to win via a T3/Farren hell, no? It's just an interesting that I scumread Dann yesterday and redtea tried to kill him off then, but now im realizing Dann is likely town and i see it completely differently

pedit: I KNOW IT MADE NO SENSE OK

I'm like a little surprised no one has jumped on and accused me and MT of being partners yet

In post 1452, flow trap wrote:

In post 1449, Morning Tweet wrote:Also fun fact, never been accused of a scumslip as scum, but I'm about 1/2 as town. So you've added to that statistic nicely

Also also, you're going to need to do better than scumreading me for viewing the gamestate through the lense of another player being town and calling it a "scumslip"

What about the second time then?

Huh

In post 1455, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1452, flow trap wrote:

In post 1449, Morning Tweet wrote:Also fun fact, never been accused of a scumslip as scum, but I'm about 1/2 as town. So you've added to that statistic nicely

Also also, you're going to need to do better than scumreading me for viewing the gamestate through the lense of another player being town and calling it a "scumslip"

What about the second time then?

Huh

You called them town twice?

Dannflor wrote:I'm like a little surprised no one has jumped on and accused me and MT of being partners yet

My wrath will immediately pour down on the first person to do that

Remember that early game tinfoil by Ich that we were both partners doing a bit to redtea about the notes PT thing? I haven't forgotten how weird that'd be as partner behaviour

In post 1456, flow trap wrote:

In post 1455, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1452, flow trap wrote:

In post 1449, Morning Tweet wrote:Also fun fact, never been accused of a scumslip as scum, but I'm about 1/2 as town. So you've added to that statistic nicely

Also also, you're going to need to do better than scumreading me for viewing the gamestate through the lense of another player being town and calling it a "scumslip"

What about the second time then?

Huh

You called them town twice?

I'm lost as to what you're talking abt

as far as i can tell MT has been approaching much of this day phase assuming i am town

likewise ive also been pretty much assuming MT is town

i don't think the fact that she deigns to use shorthand such as "x is town" over "i think x is town" is a very good case

In post 1458, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1456, flow trap wrote:

In post 1455, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1452, flow trap wrote:

In post 1449, Morning Tweet wrote:Also fun fact, never been accused of a scumslip as scum, but I'm about 1/2 as town. So you've added to that statistic nicely

Also also, you're going to need to do better than scumreading me for viewing the gamestate through the lense of another player being town and calling it a "scumslip"

What about the second time then?

Huh

You called them town twice?

I'm lost as to what you're talking abt

The second bolded thing

In post 1457, Morning Tweet wrote:Remember that early game tinfoil by Ich that we were both partners doing a bit to redtea about the notes PT thing? I haven't forgotten how weird that'd be as partner behaviour

yeah i think i called this a diseased town brain theory

love ya ich

Also that whole analysis of NSG's play would be pretty impressive partner behaviour

Skimming NSG's iso in general it seems unlikely. Maybe i shouldnt have pointed it out and let someone accuse us first but whatever

In post 1444, flow trap wrote:

In post 1436, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1431, flow trap wrote:

In post 1408, Morning Tweet wrote:could have shaken it up on flow or Esooa but they chose you instead tho

Like on me or Farren wouldnt have made sense but any of those three couldve worked

and they chose town

Can you explain the second half?

this? I broke the quote but you get the point

I'm saying that redtea COULD have voted Esooa or you, but they chose Dann who is town that i was scumreading at the time. Coincidence or not?

I'm completely missing the point that ur making rn though

In post 1463, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1444, flow trap wrote:

In post 1436, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1431, flow trap wrote:

In post 1408, Morning Tweet wrote:could have shaken it up on flow or Esooa but they chose you instead tho

Like on me or Farren wouldnt have made sense but any of those three couldve worked

and they chose town

Can you explain the second half?

this? I broke the quote but you get the point

I'm saying that redtea COULD have voted Esooa or you, but they chose Dann who is town that i was scumreading at the time. Coincidence or not?

I'm completely missing the point that ur making rn though

Like it sounds like you called Dan Town with certainty here

Okay, and what's the conclusion you draw from that

In post 1442, Morning Tweet wrote:Flow who do you want to hell besides me right now

^w^

Serious, actually not Dan still, they've had minor town comments throughout the game (like "I'm like a little surprised no one has jumped on and accused me and MT of being partners yet") and nothing overly scummy

So I'd go Farren since I somewhat doubt you and Red are partners

Thinking about it, the last 2 times I've seen a player like you're playing they were town which I scumread at the beginning, but idk if I'm psyching myself out here

In post 1465, Morning Tweet wrote:Okay, and what's the conclusion you draw from that

Is this a tactic, not commenting on it in hopes that I convince myself out of it or is this just trying to get thoughts out of me


Well, if you're town then you and Dan can't be partners and if your scum, then you probably spewed Dan town and you probably can't be partners, so I can probably eliminate that pairing

No i just think it's a poor read

Tbh your posts do kind of psyche me out into thinking it's maybe redtea/Farren sometimes. Even though their interactions would be pretty brazen.

Altho..l if you're determining your read of red being town since you're convinced I'm scum.... why aren't you voting me?

Maybe Dann had a point earlier that (aside from when redtea defended Farren from Ich), there isn't too much to deter Farren/redtea from being partners

Even though i individually townlean Farren

I dunno. If you think red and I are disaligned, would you vote red w/ me?

In post 1468, Morning Tweet wrote:Altho..l if you're determining your read of red being town since you're convinced I'm scum.... why aren't you voting me?

Did I say that .__. I don't remember saying that

I'm not sure on you, you're so towny and scummy at the same time it's making my head spin

It's a little weird not exactly knowing what Farren and redtea's stances on who is scum today are

Lemme map this out

redtea -> flow/Dann ?
Dann -> flow/Farren/redtea ?
Farren -> ????
flow -> Morning/Farren ?
Morning -> flow/redrea

something like that.. Farren is sort of considering everything it seems like

In post 1466, flow trap wrote:

In post 1442, Morning Tweet wrote:Flow who do you want to hell besides me right now

So I'd go Farren since I somewhat doubt you and Red are partners

The only thing u say about red is that they're not aligned with me so by PoE it's Farren

waiting for redtea to come along and be like "WHY HAS NO ONE HAMMERED FLOW TRAP YET? ITS A BIT SUS"

and then push me