Mafiascum.net

In post 1445, T3 wrote:I might. I might not. Either way, cookie knows my result. So if one of us dies the other person will know to potentially box scum into a corner later.

This is getting really dumb. It's no secret that I asked you and redtea to target me last night so that I could get cleared from both being scum and traitor. I know I'm neither, but the entire point was to get everyone to decide if I'm on the chopping block today, especially since I did play a part in George's miselimination. If you have a guilty or inno on me, just say it. There's no "boxing scum into a corner" here.

In post 1448, redtea wrote:same a50

uh well I did but I didn't really keep who I was targeting a secret

Thank you for actually giving information.

PE: Uhhh what. Redtea was supposed to shoot me, not Dwlee. And shooting once doesn't clear anyone, redtea has to shoot twice to account for Bulletproof Traitor.

In post 1448, redtea wrote:uh well I did but I didn't really keep who I was targeting a secret

You might want to remind us, as there appears to be confusion.

I was thinking you'd be shooting Three.

In post 1435, cool cookie wrote:

In post 1433, T3 wrote:

In post 1431, House wrote:

In post 1427, T3 wrote:cookie knows I'm town and knows my result.
I won't elaborate further.

That's cool and all, but... how can cookie "know" you're town?

If you're softing that they have information from the mod, firm it up, because a "read" is not "knowledge".

cookie knows stuff that strongly implies my claim is true. And I know that cookie knows this stuff. And cookie should know my result.

I can confirm I have info which supports T3's claim. I do not have certainty T3 is town (although if I did, it's unlikely I'd want to say so and paint a big target on their back), but I absolutely would oppose elimming them today.

T3 - is your result evident publicly? or should i simply know, irrespective of that?

Okay.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Save The Dragons

I don't really like zenman that much on a reread. Think almost50 is still town.

i have the exact opposite feeling

On a50?

i like zenman and don't like a50

Okay.

wanna talk about you voting me?

i did shoot three
i think we were saying itd be a good idea if t3 targeted dwlee

so anyway, yeah either three is 1-shot bp, the traitor, or vanilla. if i shoot him again tonight that narrows it down to the last two, which would prevent him from going back on his vt claim.

this role kinda sucks ngl

In post 1459, Save The Dragons wrote:wanna talk about you voting me?

Not really. I just think you could be mafia.

k

In post 1460, redtea wrote:i did shoot three
i think we were saying itd be a good idea if t3 targeted dwlee

so anyway, yeah either three is 1-shot bp, the traitor, or vanilla. if i shoot him again tonight that narrows it down to the last two, which would prevent him from going back on his vt claim.

this role kinda sucks ngl

FWIW, I'm okay with your idea of having the remaining unclaimed people claim at this point. Might narrow things down.

In post 1463, Jacket wrote:

In post 1460, redtea wrote:i did shoot three
i think we were saying itd be a good idea if t3 targeted dwlee

so anyway, yeah either three is 1-shot bp, the traitor, or vanilla. if i shoot him again tonight that narrows it down to the last two, which would prevent him from going back on his vt claim.

this role kinda sucks ngl

FWIW, I'm okay with your idea of having the remaining unclaimed people claim at this point. Might narrow things down.

On d2?

*raises eyebrow*

Not the best timing, but whatever.

Over half the game that's alive is outed. I think that if there's a hidden town PR in the unclaimed players they probably aren't going to last long anyway.

But if people disagree that's fine.

It's not my favorite play, but not a hill I'm willing to die on.

could be fun

ive gone back and forth on it since then
but with t3 being weird... idk, if he intends to reveal his results after n2, then maybe we could wait. If not, I'd prefer we all claim, since I think it'd be more helpful than keeping a hypothetical protective role around.

In post 1468, redtea wrote:ive gone back and forth on it since then
but with t3 being weird... idk, if he intends to reveal his results after n2, then maybe we could wait. If not, I'd prefer we all claim, since I think it'd be more helpful than keeping a hypothetical protective role around.

I have a theory about that, but I'll sit on it for now.

@t3 while theres almost guaranteed scum in a 3person neighborhood, I really dont think thats the case if its a 2person one?
Also did you mean, like, an actual s/s neighbourhood? this should be only 1 faction mafia right? And I really dont think it's likely traitor and scum would end up in the same neighborhood.
So like. What.

In post 1469, House wrote:

In post 1468, redtea wrote:ive gone back and forth on it since then
but with t3 being weird... idk, if he intends to reveal his results after n2, then maybe we could wait. If not, I'd prefer we all claim, since I think it'd be more helpful than keeping a hypothetical protective role around.

I have a theory about that, but I'll sit on it for now.

do you think itd be worth holding off claiming?

In post 1471, redtea wrote:

In post 1469, House wrote:

In post 1468, redtea wrote:ive gone back and forth on it since then
but with t3 being weird... idk, if he intends to reveal his results after n2, then maybe we could wait. If not, I'd prefer we all claim, since I think it'd be more helpful than keeping a hypothetical protective role around.

I have a theory about that, but I'll sit on it for now.

do you think itd be worth holding off claiming?

I think it's worth holding my theory until afterwards if it's going to happen so as not to influence anything.

I think as things were day 1 people seemed stuck and unsure what to do. If the setup is clearer I think there's less hesitation about who to vote.

I should probably reread some people.