Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:20 pm
VOTE: UT
If we lynch scum today it's a good thing, right?
If we lynch scum today it's a good thing, right?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
There's a reason I specified "unlimited" here. And you can tell we're wary of Ythan from our later interactions with him.In post 433, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Ythan I don't think can be scum unless there's either anunlimitedtown vigilante or a shitload of other town power out there.
a) hi, I'm Pie, you know, that guy you knew once, you could talk to meIn post 1473, Nuwen wrote:I'm not 180ing on anything? The names I'm listing as scum reads are possible lynches today, not a composite scum team. Pie/Eagle are the only not-bus lynches I'd consider for reasons not related to ActionDan, lower priority behavioral stuff.
How does you "wanting to vote us that much more" and "not wanting to be that stupid" really coexist?In post 1477, Axxle wrote:Waffles, please stop doubting Ythan. That makes me want to vote you that much more and I really don't want to be that stupid. Why would he counter claim you as scum. Please let me know any possible scenario he'd do that.
If you killed them as secondary scum. Either a second scumteam or an SK. I mean I'd rather lynch whoever killed the person Poro protected but I don't really feel like finding that person.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:First you need to ask yourself, in what possible realm do we come out at the start of day going "We vigged Triforce" as scum
You're really going to say this. Seriously. You voted for them right out of the gate after he said the littlest thing doubting you and you're going to say you're not voting for him at this moment.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Like, we're not even voting for Ythan.
My play is fine and you're upset that I've claimed the same kill as you. Don't be a brat about it.In post 1476, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Mina here.
My paranoia over Ythan right now actually has more to do with his play being horrendous (both his activity/stances and the way he's handling the not-really-but-possibly-a-1v1) than his claim (which, on balance, is more likely to come from town). Ythan, flavour for why you're a day+night vig?
By the way:
There's a reason I specified "unlimited" here. And you can tell we're wary of Ythan from our later interactions with him.In post 433, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Ythan I don't think can be scum unless there's either anunlimitedtown vigilante or a shitload of other town power out there.
Hey, Fate, the way you're treating us here looks a shitload like your ridiculous stance on Tierce in Scummies Invitational, FYI. Also, this might be the least of my problems with you, but when I asked about your reasons for suspecting us here, it's because I wanted to readyouand see what you'd try to justify it with. (It's not like we'll need to defend ourselves much for the rest of this game.)
You claimed that. And really. In what scenario would we be able to verify anything. If you *die*. and in that case it doesn't fucking matter what you are. You picked a role that seems on the surface to be easily verifiable, but in reality is not.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:We're someone who have already indicated a hide ability
Because I can't read Nuwen for shit.In post 1478, InflatablePie wrote:why UT over Nuwen?
... and then unvoted him like 10 seconds later. He said he killed triforce after already killing someone during the day. If you can't see my immediate reaction being wtf you're lying, I don't know what to tell you. I'm still not sure but practically everyone else is like if it walks like town duck and it quacks like a town duck then it's a town duck let's not even question the weirdness at all.In post 1483, Axxle wrote:You're really going to say this. Seriously. You voted for them right out of the gate after he said the littlest thing doubting you and you're going to say you're not voting for him at this moment.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Like, we're not even voting for Ythan.
I haven't played with you Tammy, but from your behavior in this single game I think you'd be bold enough to do pretty much anything.
This makes literal nonsense and not just waffley nonsense.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:You're also saying we can't be sceptical about someone having the same power we have?
No ones doubting that except for Waffles.In post 1491, Ythan wrote:No shooting deathnote in the face makes you confirmed town.
So, if we die tomorrow night, you're just going to discount the code we leave behind?In post 1485, Axxle wrote:You claimed that. And really. In what scenario would we be able to verify anything. If you *die*. and in that case it doesn't fucking matter what you are. You picked a role that seems on the surface to be easily verifiable, but in reality is not.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:We're someone who have already indicated a hide ability
Then we find out what it's meant to have meant from themselves.In post 1485, Axxle wrote:You claimed that. And really. In what scenario would we be able to verify anything. If you *die*. and in that case it doesn't fucking matter what you are. You picked a role that seems on the surface to be easily verifiable, but in reality is not.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:We're someone who have already indicated a hide ability
"Rope, please."In post 1490, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:If you can't see my immediate reaction being wtf you're lying, I don't know what to tell you
I'm pretty sure I told you to stop interacting with me or talking about me thank you.In post 1486, pirate mollie wrote:since when does tammy spell skeptical "sceptical"
LIKE THAT SOUNDS LIKE MINA
This is just bad sportsmanship btw and I'm in a better position than other townies to point it out.In post 1494, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:So, if we die tomorrow night, you're just going to discount the code we leave behind?In post 1485, Axxle wrote:You claimed that. And really. In what scenario would we be able to verify anything. If you *die*. and in that case it doesn't fucking matter what you are. You picked a role that seems on the surface to be easily verifiable, but in reality is not.In post 1480, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:We're someone who have already indicated a hide ability