Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:32 am
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
i read this as - "i'm too dumb but perhaps Titus can get us out of this using Lapsa's macho claim"In post 1474, Dunnstral wrote:For you to answer my thing but I guess not
Titus knows it, assuming me and her don't both die, it will be revealed later. Or maybe you get shot by vig?
Lapsa is who I would shoot if I were a vig
Take notes ^^^ follow my example
and lynch peregrineIn post 1477, Dunnstral wrote:Oh right I forgot you claimed macho
eh, whatever, still want you shot by vig or something
aggressive tonesIn post 1481, Dunnstral wrote:Help me from what? I'm not getting lynched.
I never heard this cover and I'm a huge fan of Simon & Garfunkel. Thanks.In post 1480, Lapsa wrote:
No, you're lynched today.In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
i'm tunedIn post 1438, Dunnstral wrote:I think I was wrong about Lapsa being town. Stay tuned
I don't know maybe the masons have good reads and yours are shit...In post 1487, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Why would scum kill a mason when your flip would just conf the other mason. It's counterproductive, scum would want to work off of the doubtcasting of your claim
A REAL mason would know this.
Macho claim is a ambit to wifom NKs. Nothing more.In post 1476, Lapsa wrote:i read this as - "i'm too dumb but perhaps Titus can get us out of this using Lapsa's macho claim"In post 1474, Dunnstral wrote:For you to answer my thing but I guess not
Titus knows it, assuming me and her don't both die, it will be revealed later. Or maybe you get shot by vig?
Lapsa is who I would shoot if I were a vig
Take notes ^^^ follow my example
good luck, backtracking scumbag
In post 1489, Titus wrote:I don't know maybe the masons have good reads and yours are shit...In post 1487, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Why would scum kill a mason when your flip would just conf the other mason. It's counterproductive, scum would want to work off of the doubtcasting of your claim
A REAL mason would know this.
God, I am in a game with dumb people. No Almost. No PV. No Performer. No No's.In post 1464, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah Almost50 viable lynch too
wise choice, TitusIn post 1490, Titus wrote:Macho claim is a ambit to wifom NKs. Nothing more.
Except for me, so here goes: Could you please help me bring back PV in this game or throw him out of it permanently?? Thanks in advance, special one!In post 1403, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Everybody has been asking favors from me all over the place, wow. I am feeling so special now.
I am not. Like wholly fuck. Masons and the word we are interchangeable. That's sarcastic snark.In post 1491, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1489, Titus wrote:I don't know maybe the masons have good reads and yours are shit...In post 1487, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Why would scum kill a mason when your flip would just conf the other mason. It's counterproductive, scum would want to work off of the doubtcasting of your claim
A REAL mason would know this.
My reads def aren't shit, I'm dubious of your+Dunnstral's reads, however
And why are you referring to the "masons" and me like we're two different people? I
You must have misinterpreted my statement. And along the way you seem to have given yourself the belief that you yourself happen to be a mason.Titus wrote:I am not. Like wholly fuck. Masons and the word we are interchangeable. That's sarcastic snark.In post 1491, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1489, Titus wrote:I don't know maybe the masons have good reads and yours are shit...In post 1487, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Why would scum kill a mason when your flip would just conf the other mason. It's counterproductive, scum would want to work off of the doubtcasting of your claim
A REAL mason would know this.
My reads def aren't shit, I'm dubious of your+Dunnstral's reads, however
And why are you referring to the "masons" and me like we're two different people? I
In post 1491, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1489, Titus wrote:I don't know maybe the masons have good reads and yours are shit...In post 1487, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Why would scum kill a mason when your flip would just conf the other mason. It's counterproductive, scum would want to work off of the doubtcasting of your claim
A REAL mason would know this.
My reads def aren't shit, I'm dubious of your+Dunnstral's reads, however
And why are you referring to the "masons" and me like we're two different people? I