Page 60 of 194

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:10 pm
by davesaz
In post 1462, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1460, Wisdom wrote:Creature is obvtowning it up
so when can we lynch Wisdom? -D
I think the quoted Wisdom post is too shallow. One burst of activity does not a town Creature make. And I think the content isn't awful but it isn't especially solid either.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:11 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1460, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1354, Gamma Emerald wrote:So Creature’s posting is absolutely awful but I don’t think his reads match what scum!him would do
no it isn't wtf guys
Creature is obvtowning it up
That’s actually in line with what I was saying about it

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:12 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1465, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1426, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, some will still bitch about quote walls, but fuck em. If you're not prepared to read don't play the fucking game, or at least don't BITCH ABOUT the need to read a text based game.
Then stop bitching about creature's posts
???
Literally a post about how people shouldn't be bitching about Creatures posts.

...

Maybe you'd realize that if you hadn't taken a piece of the post out of context, which, btw, I'd recommend no one do to my posts again. Do not fucking chop my posts up for a quote without making it crystal fucking clear that you are cherrypicking from my words to support whatever statement you're about to make.

-Cerb

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:12 pm
by DrewVa
In post 1474, Wisdom wrote:because read his posts
Frankly I don't really buy you saying he's "obvtowning it up" tbh, that does not sound like something town!you would say -D

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:13 pm
by Wisdom
hes not town because of "one burst of activity"
Its funny that you think you can assign reasons to my reads on your own

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:14 pm
by Wisdom
In post 1477, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 1465, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1426, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, some will still bitch about quote walls, but fuck em. If you're not prepared to read don't play the fucking game, or at least don't BITCH ABOUT the need to read a text based game.
Then stop bitching about creature's posts
???
Literally a post about how people shouldn't be bitching about Creatures posts.

...

Maybe you'd realize that if you hadn't taken a piece of the post out of context, which, btw, I'd recommend no one do to my posts again. Do not fucking chop my posts up for a quote without making it crystal fucking clear that you are cherrypicking from my words to support whatever statement you're about to make.

-Cerb
You were telling creature to quote wall and ignore the people who would bitch about said quote walls. You are the one who doesn't remember what you were posting.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:16 pm
by DrewVa
This is the third time Wisdom has hard pinged me today and he pinged me 0 times in BoR d1 despite his shitty pushes on town. If he flips town here, I will do something extreme, like be moderately disappointed in my ability to read him -D

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:16 pm
by Wisdom
In post 1478, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1474, Wisdom wrote:because read his posts
Frankly I don't really buy you saying he's "obvtowning it up" tbh, that does not sound like something town!you would say -D
yeah youve only seen town me saying such things one billion times
Ignoring you now because youre annoying me

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:17 pm
by Varsoon
In post 1470, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1452, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: Bujaber
Back on the track, this the anime master.
Hoes on my flick, Cowboy Bebop when I'm blastin' em
bu is town, varsoon. Dont make me worry about you.
How even though

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:18 pm
by DrewVa
In post 1482, Wisdom wrote:youve only seen town me saying such things one billion times
You do realize the -D indicates I'm signing my post as DVa right? I feel like you think you're talking to Nancy rn

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:20 pm
by davesaz
In post 1479, Wisdom wrote:hes not town because of "one burst of activity"
Its funny that you think you can assign reasons to my reads on your own
He has only had one burst of activity, therefore any read you are making must come from that burst.
I'll believe it if/when he posts meaningful material for several days.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:21 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1480, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1477, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 1465, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1426, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, some will still bitch about quote walls, but fuck em. If you're not prepared to read don't play the fucking game, or at least don't BITCH ABOUT the need to read a text based game.
Then stop bitching about creature's posts
???
Literally a post about how people shouldn't be bitching about Creatures posts.

...

Maybe you'd realize that if you hadn't taken a piece of the post out of context, which, btw, I'd recommend no one do to my posts again. Do not fucking chop my posts up for a quote without making it crystal fucking clear that you are cherrypicking from my words to support whatever statement you're about to make.

-Cerb
You were telling creature to quote wall and ignore the people who would bitch about said quote walls. You are the one who doesn't remember what you were posting.
Two independent statements were made in that post. In the first I asserted that the bitching about creature's number of posts was unwarranted, and in the second I suggested a way for him to avoid that particular bit of unwarranted criticism, while reiterating my belief that the proper response to those who bitch about reading in a text based game should be "fuck them". I can sort of see how someone incapable of reading subtext could conclude that I was bitching about Creature's posts (in spite of me explicitly stating that such complaints didn't make sense to me), but somehow everyone else who read that post correctly concluded that I was opposed to the Creature criticism.

-Cerb

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:25 pm
by Wisdom
In post 1484, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1482, Wisdom wrote:youve only seen town me saying such things one billion times
You do realize the -D indicates I'm signing my post as DVa right? I feel like you think you're talking to Nancy rn
oh i did
dva you have like one or two games with me, i really dont care about what your read on me is
People who have like 20 and still cant read me

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:27 pm
by davesaz
Re: 1486, I saw those points, correctly figured out what it was saying, and thought to myself that one or more people would fail miserably at comprehension. Successful prediction. :lol:

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:27 pm
by Wisdom
In post 1485, davesaz wrote:
In post 1479, Wisdom wrote:hes not town because of "one burst of activity"
Its funny that you think you can assign reasons to my reads on your own
He has only had one burst of activity, therefore any read you are making must come from that burst.
I'll believe it if/when he posts meaningful material for several days.
how are you ok with being so shallow
unbelievable

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:28 pm
by Reasonably Rational
Just to make this clear for those who may have difficulty with reading the intent of my posts:

I think Creature's way of catching up is perfectly fine, while also feeling that there are ways to accomplish the same goal without making lots of posts. *shrug*

-Cerb

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:29 pm
by Wisdom
Cerb youre still misunderstanding
You said "Make quote walls and people should read them because text game"
Im saying "Then let him post like he is doing now, people should read them because text game"
More clear now?

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:31 pm
by davesaz
In post 1489, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1485, davesaz wrote:
In post 1479, Wisdom wrote:hes not town because of "one burst of activity"
Its funny that you think you can assign reasons to my reads on your own
He has only had one burst of activity, therefore any read you are making must come from that burst.
I'll believe it if/when he posts meaningful material for several days.
how are you ok with being so shallow
unbelievable
Excuse me? I'm the one who's unwilling to obvtown him (or anyone but that's another discussion).

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:32 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1491, Wisdom wrote:Cerb youre still misunderstanding
You said "Make quote walls and people should read them because text game"
Im saying "Then let him post like he is doing now, people should read them because text game"
More clear now?
In post 1490, Reasonably Rational wrote:Just to make this clear for those who may have difficulty with reading the intent of my posts:

I think Creature's way of catching up is perfectly fine
,while also feeling that there are ways to accomplish the same goal without making lots of posts. *shrug*

-Cerb

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:34 pm
by Wisdom
dave you just said that because he posted one burst of posts my townread on him has to be based on that burst
Its different townreading him for POSTS he made in that burst and townreading for MAKING the burst, do you realize that?

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:36 pm
by davesaz
In post 1265, Creature wrote:
In post 41, profii wrote:it's worked before

VOTE: hebichan
Feeling this is town
In post 1270, Creature wrote:
In post 73, RCEnigma wrote:Ooo cheeky is town already. Verrrrrrrry interesting.
Okay, can see RCE being town now

(even though I disagree)
In post 1277, Creature wrote:
In post 130, Tails wrote:And you don't think there's scum in that group? I'd be on Flavor myself if I wasn't buddying up to Wisdom.
In post 131, Tails wrote:You're also voting RCE. So...
Tails town
In post 1278, Creature wrote:
In post 132, hebichan wrote:
In post 129, profii wrote:Because hebi got off after earlier saying likely scum in me/RCE/FL
Caause no one was replying at the time. Not gonna reply to a sleeping game. I'm still around.
In post 133, hebichan wrote:Oh you meant got off the RCE wagon. Same deal. I just want other people to reply. I'll get back on you three once I feel like its actually time to push who I think is scum.
hebichan should also be town
In post 1280, Creature wrote:Page 6

BEF town and hopefully I'm not wrong like last game
In post 1282, Creature wrote:
Spoiler: lol thank me for spoiling this
In post 167, BuJaber wrote:
In post 64, Toogeloo wrote:
I am reporting that I have a negative utility to town.
I can ONLY hammer, and if I place a vote that isn't the hammer, I will be modkilled.


---
I will openly claim now as well. I am
THE
Sylvester Stallone. I am not one of his characters he's played, but the actual person as my role. As the actual person, I must have final say in the lynch," i.e. I can only hammer. Don't ask why the mod chose to make my role and flavor as it is, I don't know. Don't ask me to vote if it's not the hammer, it won't happen.
A50 has to be trolling you. Why do you get the crazy roles that sound like a complete LIE but that nobody would ever fake claim...

Except this time A50 said there will be fake claims.

I still believe you though.. also I think you have a high chance of killing yourself anyway. This is based on me not trusting myself to not die with a role like that, I project the same level of human error potential on you. :?
In post 73, RCEnigma wrote:Ooo cheeky is town already. Verrrrrrrry interesting.
Based on what? And why would it be interesting?
In post 107, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 105, Tails wrote:I'm mad that Toog took my fake claim...

Anyways, I'm a Jinglebell Jester. If I'm lynched before 3p Lylo, everyone loses and Jingle wins. My wincon is to be lynched in 3p Lylo. Also, I'm Bulletproof, so no shooting me kiddos.
Anyone wanna end the game right now?
Yes actually I don't believe such a role would exist.
In post 145, Tails wrote:
In post 138, RCEnigma wrote:Why is the jester the towniest person.....besides Cheeky.
You're2right2!2I2should2claim2scum2.2
This made me laugh. Nice attitude to have regarding the last game. :lol:


Yey BuJaber is town
In post 1285, Creature wrote:
In post 347, Amzela wrote:VOTE: Wisdom
Feels town
In post 1286, Creature wrote:Alch town page 15
In post 1305, Creature wrote:Page 21

So many obvtown

Is it a good or a bad sign?
No, I'm not shallow. This is shallow.

Pedit: I disagree that the posts in the burst are meaningful (and whatever you're seeing could be fake), and assert that if he stops posting after this that will be a scumtell.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:38 pm
by Wisdom
ok cerb you were right, i only read that part of that post and wrongly assumed you were also disliking his way.
See what long posts do? I tend to skim them for what catches my eye. Didnt happen with creature's posts.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:40 pm
by Wisdom
if i didnt know dave was always like this id prolly add him to scumlist for failing to understand simple things, but nah

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:44 pm
by davesaz
In post 1468, Wisdom wrote:
In post 1447, davesaz wrote:No reason given in the vote post
This analysis is going to go great if youre basing it on reasons in vote posts
Nice editing job.
In post 1447, davesaz wrote:No reason given in the vote postNo reason given in the vote post.
Will need to ISO to find it, if there is one.
I don't take kindly to being shaded, when the thing you're trying to shade me with is something I specifically acknowledged in the quoted post yet you chose to edit it out.

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:46 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1496, Wisdom wrote:ok cerb you were right, i only read that part of that post and wrongly assumed you were also disliking his way.
See what long posts do? I tend to skim them for what catches my eye. Didnt happen with creature's posts.
Yeah, then don't fucking quote just the bit that supports your incorrect conclusions. Misrepresenting what someone else says is never acceptable.

-Cerb

Pedit: yeah, that's two of us whose posts you've fucked with to support your conclusions. Do not do it again.