Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:25 pm**

Day 1, Votecount #10

Spoiler: Flavor

pisskop (2) -

Gamma Emerald, Dannflor

skitter30 (2) -

Cinnamon, chennisden

Lil Uzi Vert (2) -

Menalque, pisskop

Cinnamon (1) -

Exilon

Menalque (1) -

Lil Uzi Vert

chennisden (1) -

skitter30

Not Voting (0) -

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2019-06-25 00:42:13)

Mod notes:

- Dannflor is V/LA until June 23rd.
- Menalque and Cinnamon are V/LA indefinitely, but will continue to receive prods at half rate.
- Gamma Emerald is being prodded.
- The day ends in a little more than 24 hours. Please note that if a deadline is reached before a consensus lynch, no lynch will occur.
- As always, let me know if I screwed up any VCs.

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:25 pm**

you were defending me at the time

i dont' understand how you went from townreading me then to scumreading me now
and i don't understand the things you're pulling out here either

like the things you're accusing me of don't make sense or didn't happen

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:27 pm**

Everyone I've interacted with has been somewhat townie from my pov but you

I was gonna sort you tomorrow but we don't have the time or the means

Your 180 on me also can have the same said for it

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:28 pm**

VOTE: chenn

that's ... incredibly revisionist compared to what you said earlier

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:30 pm**

I was also obviously not informed.

1. Bnl doesn't do that.
2. If I was informed I'd expect a CC from the hypothetical real doc if pisskop was scum. Otherwise Id get pisskop as confirmed town. And I don't reaction test like this if I was sure he's town

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:30 pm**

In post 1478, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: chenn

that's ... incredibly revisionist compared to what you said earlier

You already were

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:30 pm**

In post 1478, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: chenn

that's ... incredibly revisionist compared to what you said earlier

Please provide some evidence?

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:32 pm**

In post 1479, chennisden wrote:I was also obviously not informed.

1. Bnl doesn't do that.
2. If I was informed I'd expect a CC from the hypothetical real doc if pisskop was scum. Otherwise Id get pisskop as confirmed town. And I don't reaction test like this if I was sure he's town

i mean from my pov the simplest explanation was that you were informed that a doc exists

how am i supposed to know that bnl doesn't do that, i checked for normal games taht he's designed and couldn't find any recent ones, and i asked if anyone had mod meta on him and nobody answered

for the second one ... how is being macho any different than being informed a cop exists in that scenario

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:32 pm**

In post 1480, chennisden wrote:
In post 1478, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: chenn

that's ... incredibly revisionist compared to what you said earlier
You already were

i know, it was for emphasis

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:34 pm**

In post 628, chennisden wrote:Skitter pisskop are my towncore candidates

In post 763, chennisden wrote:skitter ur town ty for your contribootion

In post 801, chennisden wrote:chen dann skitter exilon

In post 848, chennisden wrote:And

{chen skitter exilon dann} is our don't touch ever list

In post 907, chennisden wrote:
In post 901, Cinnamon wrote:Skitter's potential partners: any people who haven't posted recently like LUV, maybe Robb, , maybe Exilon or pisskop (doubtful)
skitter and dann have spewed themselves town recently

exilon's next posts will also spew him town

In post 917, chennisden wrote:
In post 915, Dannflor wrote:
In post 912, chennisden wrote:
In post 906, Dannflor wrote:ok I'll cut to the chase

I think this is scum theatre between skitter and cinnamon right now
no reason not to vote cinnamon then
but I'm scum reading skitter more individually
if cinnamon flips green we can evaluate skitter d2

In post 924, chennisden wrote:why not now? because skitter imo is pretty blatantly town

In post 934, chennisden wrote:i don't think scum skitter will bus like this

In post 951, chennisden wrote:Skitter is townie

Dannflor if you believe cinna/skitter is s/s then pls vote cinna with us

In post 1032, chennisden wrote:ordered - {chenn exilon skitter dann}
{gamma luv}
{menalque pisskop cinnamon}

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:34 pm**

and that's just from the first page of your iso

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:35 pm**

and the turnaround came after i started pushing you so .....

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:35 pm**

In post 1482, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1479, chennisden wrote:I was also obviously not informed.

1. Bnl doesn't do that.
2. If I was informed I'd expect a CC from the hypothetical real doc if pisskop was scum. Otherwise Id get pisskop as confirmed town. And I don't reaction test like this if I was sure he's town
i mean from my pov the simplest explanation was that you were informed that a doc exists

how am i supposed to know that bnl doesn't do that, i checked for normal games taht he's designed and couldn't find any recent ones, and i asked if anyone had mod meta on him and nobody answered

for the second one ... how is being macho any different than being informed a cop exists in that scenario

You meant doc, che?

Also having someone who can pretty much be ICed is idiotic.

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:36 pm**

i don't know that that post means, sorry

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:36 pm**

In post 1477, chennisden wrote:Everyone I've interacted with
recently
has been somewhat townie from my pov but you

I was gonna sort you tomorrow but we don't have the time or the means

Your 180 on me also can have the same said for it

Sorry. Ebwop

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:37 pm**

In post 1488, skitter30 wrote:i don't know that that post means, sorry

Being macho implies a doc exists

If I'm just informed then my role is worthless after I ic pisskop. Why is that not absolutely stupid from a game design perspective

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:39 pm**

right so my point is that the turnaround came after i started pushing you ....

and you don't have any reasons (that seem to make sense or actually mean anything) for it

and i don't know why you went from p hard townreading me to pushing me now

like if you're town here what am i missing in your thought process because i dont' get it rn

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:39 pm**

[quote="In post 1490, chennisden"][/quote]

i don't understand the distinction you're drawing - being macho is kinda softly informing that a doc probably exists

why would informed that a doc exists ic the doc either .... docs can be scum?

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:40 pm**

The turnaround is because you pushed the "obv" pr

My iso might have some doubting of you from earlier and I'll look

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:41 pm**

In post 1492, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1490, chennisden wrote:
i don't understand the distinction you're drawing - being macho is kinda softly informing that a doc probably exists

why would informed that a doc exists ic the doc either .... docs can be scum?

Far more likely to be town and scum doc implies vigi no?

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:43 pm**

being informed isn't something that i woudlnt' lynch day1 ... it's not in the same league as a doc, not even remotely

like i thought you were informed; informed isn't a role that would inherently make me not lynch someone day1, so i pushed it
i don't understand the problem you're having

like are you really trying to say that it's problematic to push informed or macho or something similar day1 ?

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:44 pm**

In post 1494, chennisden wrote:
In post 1492, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1490, chennisden wrote:
i don't understand the distinction you're drawing - being macho is kinda softly informing that a doc probably exists

why would informed that a doc exists ic the doc either .... docs can be scum?
Far more likely to be town and scum doc implies vigi no?

for all i know we live in a vigi setup

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:44 pm**

In post 606, chennisden wrote:
In post 548, skitter30 wrote:
In post 501, skitter30 wrote:
In post 358, Menalque wrote:Okay, but do you not think doc is a weird claim to make?

Also the immediate claim at L-1 threw me a bit, no one had announced intent then

Like I feel that scum fakeclaiming doc to try and force
the
real doc to come out wouldn’t make the fake claim until intent was posted
again, what's with the 'the'?

it implies that you think that there is definitely a doc in the game ... (otherwise you'd have said 'a' doc)
and this is a closed normal

In post 495, skitter30 wrote:
In post 338, pisskop wrote:oh hey.

im the doc

gg guys
not really sure that i believe

(also why 'the' doc?)
@dann what do u think of these?
Skitter is this TMI?

In post 917, chennisden wrote:
In post 915, Dannflor wrote:
In post 912, chennisden wrote:
In post 906, Dannflor wrote:ok I'll cut to the chase

I think this is scum theatre between skitter and cinnamon right now
no reason not to vote cinnamon then
but I'm scum reading skitter more individually
if cinnamon flips green we can evaluate skitter d2

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:44 pm**

In post 1495, skitter30 wrote:being informed isn't something that i woudlnt' lynch day1 ... it's not in the same league as a doc, not even remotely

like i thought you were informed; informed isn't a role that would inherently make me not lynch someone day1, so i pushed it
i don't understand the problem you're having

like are you really trying to say that it's problematic to push informed or macho or something similar day1 ?

I NEVER claimed only macho.

Posted: **Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:45 pm**

My tr on you was also heavily dependent on a red cinnamon

Mafiascum.net

Mini Normal 2081 — My First Game! [Game Over]