Mafiascum.net

In post 1475, Katsuki wrote:Hey RC, if you ever think I'm going to read a game that pumps out 60pgs over the span of a single weekend, you're sorely mistaken.

I'll work my magic when the game becomes more playable, but not before then.

In post 1477, Katsuki wrote:Then fun things will happen.

I'll take this opportunity to say that if there is some retard out there who would ever consider vigging me, don't do it N1. I can easily break this game so scum if you're gonna NK, come at me.

In post 1453, Hidden Happiness wrote:Tana and Ephraim are very much in their scum ranges and have done almost nothing that I’ve seen to make me warrant a townread on them

In post 1480, gameplay506 wrote:Can you like
Pressure people without changing your vote every 2 pages?

In post 1457, Hidden Happiness wrote:I swear to god if people keep trying to read me like this.

In post 758, DrDolittle wrote:evidence that I'm reading.

Tana and Ephraim (Sakura Hana + RadiantCowbells) [X]: arrogance 401 reminds me of town, i like the pops push, I'm ok with the interaction with SS, but there's definitely some hokey: i.e. FoTM.

Bitmap [X]: lean town - I liked her grasp on eventide + I think the culling of discussion on game play is fair.

RCEnigma [X]: i think voting, inactive is typically scum as in 452.

Dannflor [X]: mmm, weak town read, but 533 interests me. does scum dan take a consiliatory tone towards his scum reads? his flop between SS-town vs scum makes me wary but could be cause he's a nice fellow.

Sailor Senshi (Shiro + Krazy + Nancy Drew 39) [X]: Nothing AI imo. But I'm town reading for [redacted] reasons

Gamma Emerald [X]: town, like the action of 383 attacking LLD, I also think pages 18-19 attacking bitmap is town driven, as agreement with most of the people. I liked his mediation - that was in good faith. Might be my strongest town read at the moment.

popsofctown [X]: lean scum, vote switch galore, hop on bitmap was no good imo. Other reasons here or there

Titus [X]: town, push lurkers, solid interaction with rc, etc.

Lady Eventide (Evenstar + Lillaire)[X]: scummy. but weak scummy, as discussed by bitmap and Dann. I thought "liliare felt bad" was town, but still nothing substantial by any means.

gameplay506 [X]: 714's summary is lame, but it's probably a town summary.

In post 767, DrDolittle wrote:hmm

Eventide's vote on SS is pretty shoddy. being pressured leading to spat is a terribly weak reason to scum read people... what do you want, that after being pressured you just lay down and die?

I don't think gameplay is scum, but please don't use personal RL stuff as a point of attack.

If Eventide would flip scum, Titus's (hello titus!) attack on gameplay is very much chainsaw.

In post 771, Lady Eventide wrote:

In post 767, DrDolittle wrote:hmm

Eventide's vote on SS is pretty shoddy. being pressured leading to spat is a terribly weak reason to scum read people... what do you want, that after being pressured you just lay down and die?

I don't think gameplay is scum, but please don't use personal RL stuff as a point of attack.

If Eventide would flip scum, Titus's (hello titus!) attack on gameplay is very much chainsaw.

Pressure leading to

personal attacks and threats of reporting

is very much a scumtell. Pressure leading to

debate and defense

is

not;

it's the fact that it got personal very quickly that's pinging me. Personal arguments don't say shit about the gamestate, and therefore mafia want to cast any disagreement with them as a personal issue, not a legitimate argument based on real evidence. I've straight up called a townie a bitch and an asshole to cover for a scumslip I made. I'm not

proud

of that, but it's a thing that I did.

-Evenstar

In post 902, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I did read other (finished) games of yours and the specific tell that I was referring to earlier in this thread was from -not the MU game that you linked-.
However it is also present in that game so I feel a lot safer simply citing 'reasons' as I have been doing to date.

In post 810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 807, Katsuki wrote:

In post 299, Tana and Ephraim wrote:The fact that both LLD and Katsuki have expressed intent to lurk is beyond concerning and I don't think either slot should be left alive past even day 1 if they are lurking.

Which head made this post?

That was E, all untagged posts are E

In post 1482, Tana and Ephraim wrote:

In post 1453, Hidden Happiness wrote:Tana and Ephraim are very much in their scum ranges and have done almost nothing that I’ve seen to make me warrant a townread on them

So this is how you're going to be like huh
-Tana