Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2019 4:52 am
Well, yeah. But I just wanted to illustrate that it does happen.In post 1474, Gentleman 5 wrote:Thats alot of posts with no context.
Well, yeah. But I just wanted to illustrate that it does happen.In post 1474, Gentleman 5 wrote:Thats alot of posts with no context.
I just think you are too worried about leaving. Its not coming off as a town look to me.In post 1472, Gentleman 3 wrote:This is a non sequitur that I think pretends to be an actual argument? Can you rephrase this in more formal terms, i.e. tell me exactly what your premises and conclusion are?In post 1466, Gentleman 5 wrote:People die in mafia, if you worry too much about living youre not going anywhere mate.
Im sure it does, but context matters. Like why they decided to leave. Do you want to tell me all those you quoted were spur of the moment moves?Gentleman 3 wrote:Well, yeah. But I just wanted to illustrate that it does happen.In post 1474, Gentleman 5 wrote:Thats alot of posts with no context.
I mean obviously nobody would leave unless they thought their partner is scum, but I'd bet that some of them were fairly spur-of-the-moment. But there's nothing to lose by, you know, trying to wagon them first... and tons of information is lost when you just yeet out of there.In post 1476, Gentleman 4 wrote:That said, most of those people you quoted leaving (at least of the ones I looked at), Gentleman 3, left because they thought their partner is scum, not due to some insignificant quibble, which makes your post remarkably dishonest in the way it presents itself in context.
Why not?In post 1479, Gentleman 5 wrote:I just think you are too worried about leaving. Its not coming off as a town look to me.
This post is relatively contrary to the following one,In post 1480, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean obviously nobody would leave unless they thought their partner is scum, but I'd bet that some of them were fairly spur-of-the-moment. But there's nothing to lose by, you know, trying to wagon them first... and tons of information is lost when you just yeet out of there.In post 1476, Gentleman 4 wrote:That said, most of those people you quoted leaving (at least of the ones I looked at), Gentleman 3, left because they thought their partner is scum, not due to some insignificant quibble, which makes your post remarkably dishonest in the way it presents itself in context.
Which I realize is re-framed by the post that follows it,In post 1459, Gentleman 3 wrote:It is a tradition in this setup for people to leave for stupid, petty reasons.In post 1458, Gentleman 5 wrote:Why do you think people plan on leaving?
but I doubt I stand alone in believing you were trying to say you were afraid of players leaving due to play-style differences or something akin. Either way, quoting simply all the times town players have been wrong either exposes your confirmation bias or attempts to take advantage of the fact that we can't see all the times town has been right.In post 1461, Gentleman 3 wrote:By which I mean people are (a) impulsive, (b) intoxicated by the power of being able to immediately kill someone, and (c) bad at calculating why it's mathematically not a good idea to leave.
I think fearing someone else leaving is much more real for scum than town, and even if you disagree with me on this, why is this a fear that scum would have to fake? You're proposing my approach to your dilemma as one with only two options, but I think one of these isn't even close to one of the most likely probabilities.In post 1482, Gentleman 3 wrote:Why is that something I might fake concern for as scum, but for which I'd be less likely to really have concern for as town?
What are the odds that I don't think leaving is REALLY a big issue for town, but I'm scum and I'm pretending I do, because I think it will bring me some advantage?
This more likely probability that you've yet to mention.In post 1484, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think fearing someone else leaving is much more real for scum than town, and even if you disagree with me on this, why is this a fear that scum would have to fake? You're proposing my approach to your dilemma as one with only two options, but I think one of these isn't even close to one of the most likely probabilities.In post 1482, Gentleman 3 wrote:Why is that something I might fake concern for as scum, but for which I'd be less likely to really have concern for as town?
What are the odds that I don't think leaving is REALLY a big issue for town, but I'm scum and I'm pretending I do, because I think it will bring me some advantage?
I dont think youre faking the fear of leaving.In post 1482, Gentleman 3 wrote:Why is that something I mightfakeconcern for as scum, but for which I'd be less likely to really have concern for as town?
What are the odds that I don't think leaving is REALLY a big issue for town, but I'm scum and I'm pretending I do, because I think it will bring me some advantage?
It's because of math. For any other pair to make it to endgame, we could lose because the gent in that pair is scum, or we could lose because the lady in that pair is scum.In post 1486, Gentleman 5 wrote:You want to make it to endgame, im starting to think its because youre scum.
Only if it was MYLO, and even then only with significant deliberation. Otherwise I would attempt to wagon them.In post 1488, Gentleman 5 wrote:G3 if you pair up with someone that you later read as scum, would you leave?
If things usually work out in time, how are you expecting the player base to know how later days will turn out or whether or not you will make it to end game?In post 1487, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean town has left the dance and been right in the past, but when I pair with someone, that's not what I'm concerned about, because it's impossible for them to do that.
And yes I was afraid of players leaving due to playstyle differences. I have been scumread for playstyle differences over and over, in almost every game I play. Usually that read works itself out with enough time, but if my partner leaves on me before it can, then they have potentially screwed town over in a major way.
I want L2 and L6 to weigh in on this when they get a chance. To both of you, if I pair with you, how will you go about trying to read me? What will you do if you scumread me? What will you do if I scumread you?
I know I deleted context, but I didn't really want the rest of the post getting in the way of the question:In post 1489, Gentleman 3 wrote:So if I'm NOT making it to endgame, it doesn't MATTER who I pair with.
Am I misremembering this, or did G4 like L3 all game, get replaced, and then the replacement went right back to liking L3 again? I haven't really seen what L3's done that's towny, and I'm garbage at identifying mains. I'm suspicious of this pair, but at the same time, I don't really think that either of them have enough town equity to be an S/S pair that will survive to the end.In post 891, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think it would be good for me to have a partner early, and I think of the ladies, three is best for me.
So, my dear, I'd like to re-extend my offer.
Lady 3, dance with me?
I was bothered by L4 at the start, I didn't like her early posts as much. Whereas you've felt more natural and contributing to a way of making good pairings. Also, L4's kind of suspicious of me, so we'd make a bad pair, and I'm also a tad suspicious of people who are suspicious of me. Because I think I play scummy and I've had scum go after me before as an easy target.In post 894, Lady 7 wrote:I meant to ask about this earlier, why is L4 listed as sort of and not the other way around? I didn't think you had that much of a town read on me, and I thought that L4 was more widely town read than me in general.In post 860, Gentleman 7 wrote:I feel like my stronger lady townreads (L7, sort of L4) are too towny
I'm thinking she is likely town. Also, I think shes only made one rude post in this game and I dont understand why she keeps apologizing for playing mafia.In post 1478, Gentleman 4 wrote:And because my curiosity gets the better of me, I must ask, Lady 4, how do you feel about Lady 7 right now?
What do you like about me?In post 977, Lady 2 wrote:I'd be open to G6 but he doesn't have eyes for me. I've thought about G1 (needs to start posting again tho) and G7 (though I've questioned whether he's Town quite a bit) as potentially attractive partners.In post 973, Lady 3 wrote:Who are you looking to pair with Lady 2?
Yes.In post 1492, Gentleman 4 wrote:Do you really think that it doesn't matter who you pair with if you will not make it to end game?
If I scumread you and you TR me, I'd talk to you heavily. If you were scum, you'd lead me to partners. If last scum alive, self wagon. If it was a mutual scumread, we'd definitely self wagon. I like talkers to be my good partners.In post 1487, Gentleman 3 wrote:I want L2 and L6 to weigh in on this when they get a chance. To both of you, if I pair with you, how will you go about trying to read me? What will you do if you scumread me? What will you do if I scumread you?