Mafiascum.net

In post 1456, Hoopla wrote:klick/prana/battle mage

could the game really be this easy?

did i make this list because I'm NK proof and so you need to push to lynch me now?

AGar - if Klick flips scum, I'm Vigging Not-Science tonight, don't roleblock me! If Klick flips town, I'm all over vigging you.

In post 1475, Battle Mage wrote: did i make this list because I'm NK proof and so you need to push to lynch me now?

are you actually claiming to be NK proof or are you being a hilarious jokester?

also, this is my main reason for suspecting you;

In post 1452, Hoopla wrote:a key suspect i've developed in my reread of this sequence of events is battle mage. he was an active presence the game when he arrived, but happily sat on his initial gypyx vote without much comment on the main wagons - wagons he knew to be town. he even sat on this vote through the rise and fall of flippy's L-2 wagon and una's L-1 wagon. he lurked through the flippy claiming fiasco. he did nothing to further the game during crucial periods - i suspect happy to just sit back and let the town mislynch any one of their main three incorrect lynches.

it's precisely the sort of behaviour across multiple metrics i look for on d1 that makes you stand out to me. the fact that your predecessor was lurky and you fit well with my other scumread is the icing, not the cake.

weak argument, as it presumes I'm scum at the outset, and tries to create a narrative to fit with that. You could do that for any player if you tried. Meaningless.

From a wider mafia gameplay perspective (I teach this to newbies in the newbie games), it's good practice to start with an assumption of scum being ON the mislynch wagons, not off them. The fact so many people on this site stray from this, is precisely why scum win so many games just by shamelessly pushing and lynching townies with no reprisal.

You've done a good job of making it sound scientific and clever, but the substance is actually misguided and lazy.

In post 1463, notscience wrote:If pranas town he should be on you tonight then, yes?

The flaw being... as you so kindly announced it in thread, I have to come along and go "yes, of course I'll be watching Agar". Meaning Scum wont be killing him. Meaning I wont get any info. Meaning tomorrow it will all be "see, no result again".

Fucking hell you people.

Then we have Hoopla twisting shit to make herself seem town, doing her damndest to off a Watcher via lynch as well now.

I'd love to lynch a Hoopla, but at the lack of anyone else stepping in and counterclaiming Agar...

VOTE: klick

I think I spelled it right anyway.

In post 1479, PranaDevil wrote:Then we have Hoopla twisting shit to make herself seem town, doing her damndest to off a Watcher via lynch as well now.

i don't need to twist.

i simply lay it all out in earnest; humbly, courageously.

In post 1479, PranaDevil wrote:Fucking hell you people.

and just what exactly do you mean by ""? hmm?

do you mean... ?

In post 1480, Hoopla wrote:

In post 1479, PranaDevil wrote:Then we have Hoopla twisting shit to make herself seem town, doing her damndest to off a Watcher via lynch as well now.

i don't need to twist.

i simply lay it all out in earnest; humbly, courageously.

In post 1481, Hoopla wrote:

In post 1479, PranaDevil wrote:Fucking hell you people.

and just what exactly do you mean by "

you people

"? hmm?

do you mean...

townies

?

"I don't need to twist" proceeds to blatantly twist.

You're lucky that Agar caught your teammate last night, because holy fuck you need to swing.

VOTE: klick

do we quicklynch, or do you guys feel like we need more daytime?

In post 1419, notscience wrote:Let’s stop stressing the prs atm and start lynching scummage

my thoughts precisely - bob if you keep talking about PRs, i will literally just vote you and coast the entire day until you are dead

In post 1427, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1426, notscience wrote:I don’t think we can know who hypothetical prs targeted unless they claim.

we can make pretty logical deductions. Why are you fishing for more claims here??

this is 100% not fishing for claims but keep talking about your "logical deductions" and a claim might actually come. is that fishing?

Turns out scum isn't as fun as it was years ago

But at least there's shitting up the thread when you've been lynched?

In post 1486, Klick wrote:Turns out scum isn't as fun as it was years ago

let this be a lesson to you. crime never pays.

How are you Hoopla? I hope you survive when I'm gone. You and I have got a game to win.

Sorry we couldn't be town together this time Hoopla. I look forward to playing a game where we're the same alignment.

Good luck Hoopla. I've always wanted to be in a game with an SK win.

You've got this Hiraki. Thanks for putting me to L-1.

the cheek of this scumbag!

even in the final throes of life, he only knows one way. a true monster.

You should be fine. He got lucky with the block, but you're going to come out of this looking good, especially with my nonsense posting earlier.

Oh no, don't read that!

What a silly mistake. RIP

Really sorry man. It looks enough like shit posting that I doubt they'll get much out of it. Still, I should have been more careful.

D'oh!

Have any of you played Celeste? I picked it up about a month ago and I'm totally enthralled. It's entirely my kind of game: very hard platformer, yet welcoming and friendly.

I finished Farewell a couple of days ago. My next task is 3A's Golden Strawberry. It's such an endurance task, I keep struggling on the second subsection.

I've also been playing lots of TFT. The mid-set expansion is excellent. I'm having a load of fun spamming the newest legit meta comp, Malphite Sorcerers. Just bulk up Malphite with a couple of Warmogs, make 3* Ahri an ADC with Guinsoo's and an AD item, and grab Janna in the late-game.