And for the record, we actually get tasks done slightly slower on a per-night basis if we claim. It's just that we prevent additional NKs (which is good for tasks in the long run)
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:18 pm
by Flea The Magician
people aren't liking my votes....
that mean if I vote no lim people will not vote there? I feel that no lim is not an option with this many possibly suspects.
If you say so. Pre iso I was wanting to confirm a town lean/read as I was getting suspicious. post iso suspicions confirmed, and honestly I didn't get the result I wanted from it.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:19 pm
by MURDERCAT
Like my point is that if you think it's unlikely that a mass claim of tasks breaks the game, you should also think that tasks are a viable win con.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:23 pm
by Akarin
In post 1479, MURDERCAT wrote:Like my point is that if you think it's unlikely that a mass claim of tasks breaks the game, you should also think that tasks are a viable win con.
Oh, well I completely agree with this then!
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:23 pm
by MURDERCAT
Yeah I'm agreeing with you lol
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:26 pm
by Thestatusquo
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:30 pm
by Thestatusquo
Thegoldenparadox has been prodded
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:31 pm
by Flea The Magician
I think I might've gone super paranoia mode this game
(´･(´･(´･(´･(´･(´･д･`) ･`)･`)･`)･`)･`)
I should try reading someone I fully townread. I think Taly's my strongest town read rn... I'll shove him to the top of the todo and use that as a measuring stick.
UNVOTE: Titus for now while I reassess my mental state and my paranoia levels {]( ^_^;)[}
# Among Us
Flea's TODO wrote:
!!ISO Taly
ISO Titus
ISO DBG
Work out recovery from outing my locations if no backup plan.
ISO TGP
Anyway it seems like we are going to elim today, I am happy enough with the comp of the Blitzo wagon compared to Titus and I think Blitzo has things that are actively kind of scummy so if we want to try to shoot the scum then fine. But I think there's good reasons to think that tasks are viable and miselims hurt us more than usual for that reason, so if it were up to me I would no elim.
In post 1456, xRECKONERx wrote:i am saying i believe titus is going to flip town but nice try
i wouldnt be eating my words if im red
but thanks for TMIing to everyone that I'm green bro
VOTE: Reck
VOTE: Reck
dgb you're better than this
You're right
VOTE: Titus
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:26 pm
by Bell
Not to be that guy but I do believe Sunday is 2 days from now.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:31 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Heyas! What’s happenin’?
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:32 pm
by TheGoldenParadox
In post 555, Blitzo wrote:Hi.
Will be catching up either later or tomorrow.
Is there anything in particular anyone would like me to look at?
In post 787, Blitzo wrote:Work is far busier than I thought.
Will not be officially catching up until later tonight, though I'll be lurking about until then.
I've read a number of pages (up to about page 10 I think) and I think MC is suspicious for pushing cake for supposedly agreeing with a similar assessment of the plan.
Reads like changing his opinions based on nothing.
As for claiming tasks and rooms, I'm not sure I'll do that yet.
I will wait until I catch up before making a decision on whether or not I should do so.
In post 823, Blitzo wrote:There is way too much pointless drivel right now.
Not sure how I feel about it either, considering how big the game is.
I might start perusing that group instead.
Let's start by looking at this opening from Blitzo. He begins with promises to catch up, but work is busy. Sure. Then he attacks the thread for being "pointless drivel", when most of it is genuine mechanical conversation and discussion that has unveiled at least a decent bit of information. He promises to "officially catch up" later, but in 893 he uses working to explain not catching up - again - and then says it's pointless regardless. 963 calls the thread nonsense yet again.
Not interacting with the thread, repeatedly promising to catch up and then not doing so, calling essentially everything that had been said pointless. This isn't coming from a town mindset, I don't think - it's coming from scum who don't feel the need to actually catch up and sort in any way.
In post 895, Blitzo wrote:Work is calling again, busy until a bit later unfortunately.
I will note that voting into the no elims might prove fruitful - I feel like that's an idea that's obviously bad so there could be something behind it.
BM being there probably means something.
This post confuses me for a couple of reasons - supporting an idea that's "obviously bad" because it "might prove fruitful," using a single scumread (who's also... not much of a scumread, considering that by that point, the only thing Blitzo had posted about BM was "@OWER - I can see that you want to get the ball rolling on BM but is there anything else actually behind that?") to justify this admittedly obviously bad idea.
Just generally, I don't see the motivation behind Blitzo's posts as coming from a solving, town mindset.
In post 972, Blitzo wrote:Oh never mind I just remembered what they were.
DGB has been voting me since pretty early in yet only came up with reasons after some time had passed?
I was leaning town there but I feel like that's just coming up with excuses later.
I think I really need more engagement from her considering it feels like a storyline is being developed there and I don't like it.
I also feel like I addressed the supposed "case" on me a little while ago and nothing changed for some reason?
I also don't know what it means that I don't want to "spar" someone.
I mean I'm here in yet she's talking around me trying to get people to vote me.
What's up?
My second thought was that TGP was entirely forgettable.
I might let that develop for a bit and see what happens.
PEDIT - Speak of the devil. What's wrong with my post TGP?
I've pointed out why the last two sentences here are bad in 979
but the rest of this post is bad as well. attacking people (specifically dgb) simply for pushing you is classic newbscum behavior, and trying to throw shade on your wagon by calling it a "supposed 'case'" and generally attacking his own wagon specifically like this is a lot closer to scum behaviour and motivation than town.
In post 1017, Blitzo wrote:@DGB - was this whole scumread thing a ploy to get me to vote for BM?
@Akarin - What exactly do you mean by "bonus kills?"
Sorry if I missed it, I checked your ISO and I know that you've been talking about it but I'm just not really seeing it.
A task win as a primary win where we outrace scum by doing tasks before they simply kill us can't be possible.
Like...That
can't
be right.
Pedit - reck has pretty much said everything I wanted to say about it.
the task win is absolutely possible in source material and explicitly an alternate way of town winning the game, but blitzo literally dismisses it out of hand and cites Reck in the same way that Haschel does. i genuinely do not understand why you think this is impossible, but please shift your perceptions here.
so i know i've voted blitzo already but VOTE: blitzo to hammer the point home - this is scum.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:35 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Is the concept of coordinating anything just out the window now >:?
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:35 pm
by Titus
VOTE: Blitzo
I can sheep that.
Sorry for those of you who don't like my VLA. I'm rarely around Friday nights and Saturdays. You can see it in my site history.
If I get miseliminated for voting scum and having a life, I can live with that. We still should be no executing though. If we do miseliminate, I'm objectively the best one. So like I said, no hard feelings.
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:36 pm
by Alisae
Man do I want to scumhunt
or do I just want to win through tasks
