Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:14 pm
What are your thoughts about that?In post 1472, Something_Smart wrote:In post 687, Spiffeh wrote:Am I reading right that the notsci hydra is L-1?
Wtf is going on over there~skitter~ is going on
What are your thoughts about that?In post 1472, Something_Smart wrote:In post 687, Spiffeh wrote:Am I reading right that the notsci hydra is L-1?
Wtf is going on over there~skitter~ is going on
I understand but I think it's suboptimalIn post 1474, Deacon Blues wrote:There's a mechanics perspective for Annie, as well as a game health perspective.In post 1471, superbowl9 wrote:Turning annie just seems so suboptimal here. At least get firebringer over from a mechanics perspective
unvote it thenIn post 1473, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm not really opposed to that either; ffery has some additional thoughts here
-b
YesIn post 1478, Annie Edison wrote:Are you following the other thread, sup?
trying to work this out w/ ffery, please holdIn post 1479, superbowl9 wrote:unvote it thenIn post 1473, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm not really opposed to that either; ffery has some additional thoughts here
-b
I have already said that it makes me nervous.In post 1475, Deacon Blues wrote:What are your thoughts about that?
Can't.In post 1479, superbowl9 wrote:unvote it thenIn post 1473, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm not really opposed to that either; ffery has some additional thoughts here
-b
deaconIn post 1485, Annie Edison wrote:Who is this directed at
^You understand how bad this looks rightIn post 1487, Deacon Blues wrote:Can't.In post 1479, superbowl9 wrote:unvote it thenIn post 1473, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm not really opposed to that either; ffery has some additional thoughts here
-b
We need to do this.
Or we elim skitter today. Even so, eliming skitter and not turnstiling notsci is suboptimal IMO.
i trust enough to go along with consensus (i dont particularly
I'm townreading you. Pretty sure I've said that once or twice.
I work with my scumreadsIn post 1493, Deacon Blues wrote:I'm townreading you. Pretty sure I've said that once or twice.
I wouldn't be trying to work with you if I weren't.
Looks don't matter.In post 1491, superbowl9 wrote:^You understand how bad this looks rightIn post 1487, Deacon Blues wrote:Can't.In post 1479, superbowl9 wrote:unvote it thenIn post 1473, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm not really opposed to that either; ffery has some additional thoughts here
-b
We need to do this.
Or we elim skitter today. Even so, eliming skitter and not turnstiling notsci is suboptimal IMO.
I think it would be a fun "i told you so" to the council - maybe they would choke on their wine a little bitIn post 1495, Something_Smart wrote:I feel like executing skitter day 1 is just a bad idea even if she's super scummy (which she isn't).
Even if we do get a chance to hear from her six days down the line.
Send me away then. Get her out of her tunnel.In post 1495, Something_Smart wrote:I feel like executing skitter day 1 is just a bad idea even if she's super scummy (which she isn't).
Even if we do get a chance to hear from her six days down the line.
There we differ.In post 1494, superbowl9 wrote:I work with my scumreadsIn post 1493, Deacon Blues wrote:I'm townreading you. Pretty sure I've said that once or twice.
I wouldn't be trying to work with you if I weren't.