Mafiascum.net

I miss the days where we only had a few pages a day

In post 1168, Oil Tycoons wrote:

In post 1166, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 1156, Guillotina wrote:FFS I'm working 12 hour shifts now Noraa, I don't have the same amount of time I did in past games! There are 11 other players that I want to play with and sort out! Sorry I'm not sorry for not dedicating 20 more pages bickering back and forth with you but I just don't have the time! I'm almost a V/LA where I can spend just a few hours here, so you can't expect me to just focus on you so you won't scum read me! Come on now! Different game, different circumstances.

????

You scum read nora do you not?

cough nothing to see here

Hey Mara. Long time no see.

It has been.

Forgive me for keeping your slot at arm's length

In post 1474, Sugar Cain wrote:There's to much to read. Maybe if everyone stopped posting

I can do this. But only if you promise to town read me and never stop.

In post 1473, Titus wrote:

In post 1472, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1466, Titus wrote:Can we stop tearing each other apart and just get Gamma? No one TRs him because he's scum.

I'm neutral on Gamma. Nothing to make me want to vote for him.

Why are you neutral?

His manner feels like it could be genuine. His posts haven't really stood out to me, but I think he made a couple of good takes.

In order of priority, I'd like to elim:

A scummy player
A useless player

Gamma is currently neither of the above.

In post 1474, Sugar Cain wrote:There's to much to read. Maybe if everyone stopped posting

It's fine to admit you're not reading. Believe me, I get it. But don't pretend you have and then try and make arguments based on something you don't understand because you don't know what has happened.

In post 1463, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 1275, Battle Mage wrote:I have tried several times to extend the olive branch though and said I won't engage with that slot's tunnel on me to keep the game moving productively.

Have you?

I've seen no such thing.

I have also seen you state things that faer never do as town, do those as town. More than one person has noted it and your still going down this rediculous tunnel, to the extent that it seems that you're ignoring the rest of the game

Becasue I caught him in his lie and he got in too deep an hes tryyyyyna keeep, up above with his head, insteeeeaaaaada goin under!

He won't interact with me because then he's got to admit he's lied constantly.

it was easier when the Sugar Cain slot was just Nero Cain. you know what you get with Nero Cain.

In post 1477, Bell wrote:

In post 1474, Sugar Cain wrote:There's to much to read. Maybe if everyone stopped posting

I can do this. But only if you promise to town read me and never stop.

Wish I could, our experience together was too brief. I can see some play parallels though

Pedit: I know what I have seen, and what my partner has told me. I also saw you removed yourself from the tunnel like titus had asked. I did see the initial post where you scum read him and I do remember it being super off base for someone you apparently know inside and out

nah flea, i'm not interacting with you because you're making the game a complete chore for me, and I'm respecting the request from other players that I don't continue to indulge your behaviour at the expense of any other slots being looked at. your approach to me is objectively bad-faith, and anti-town, and if there's a majority of players bad enough to sheep you on it, I'm fine with dying. I'm only continuing playing in the vain hope that eventually you'll give it a rest and do something useful.

In post 1483, Battle Mage wrote:nah flea, i'm not interacting with you because you're making the game a complete chore for me, and I'm respecting the request from other players that I don't continue to indulge your behaviour at the expense of any other slots being looked at. your approach to me is objectively bad-faith, and anti-town, and if there's a majority of players bad enough to sheep you on it, I'm fine with dying. I'm only continuing playing in the vain hope that eventually you'll give it a rest and do something useful.

Then answer my last question to you.

In post 1482, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 1477, Bell wrote:

In post 1474, Sugar Cain wrote:There's to much to read. Maybe if everyone stopped posting

I can do this. But only if you promise to town read me and never stop.

Wish I could, our experience together was too brief. I can see some play parallels though

Pedit: I know what I have seen, and what my partner has told me. I also saw you removed yourself from the tunnel like titus had asked. I did see the initial post where you scum read him and I do remember it being super off base for someone you apparently know inside and out

based on the above, and your reading of the game, and what your partner has told you, do you understand why i might struggle to seriously engage with your characterisation of me as a serial tunneller, when my vote has flip-flopped more than anybody's and I've tried reasonably hard to stop the player in question from tunnelling, making the point that it isn't productive? You asked me a question, and it's impossible to answer when your starting presumption is, as you would say, "super off base".

In post 1483, Battle Mage wrote:nah flea, i'm not interacting with you because you're making the game a complete chore for me, and I'm respecting the request from other players that I don't continue to indulge your behaviour at the expense of any other slots being looked at. your approach to me is objectively bad-faith, and anti-town, and if there's a majority of players bad enough to sheep you on it, I'm fine with dying. I'm only continuing playing in the vain hope that eventually you'll give it a rest and do something useful.

Amazing post if scum.

heh, what is it if town?

In post 1487, Battle Mage wrote:heh, what is it if town?

It makes sense.

In post 1482, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 1477, Bell wrote:

In post 1474, Sugar Cain wrote:There's to much to read. Maybe if everyone stopped posting

I can do this. But only if you promise to town read me and never stop.

Wish I could, our experience together was too brief. I can see some play parallels though

Pedit: I know what I have seen, and what my partner has told me. I also saw you removed yourself from the tunnel like titus had asked. I did see the initial post where you scum read him and I do remember it being super off base for someone you apparently know inside and out

That’s fine. It’s hard to contain my enthusiasm and posting when I roll town tbh. I was busy when the game started. I haven’t been eliminated during a day phase as town since I got back. I don’t think this game is gunna be different so i’m pretty much just gunna be a poa for the scum team unless my reads are super bad.

I kinda compensate lately by making a notes PT. Maybe I should make one for this game so I slow down a bit.

Bell, who we elimming?

I hoped flea,
But i’m not a psychic.

Ideal world: flea > get two extra days push gamma, dunnstral. Read oil, Mastina, Noraa more closely to solidify reads better.
Then decide on contender number 2.

Ideal world is not the world I live in tho.

And hope SB9 isn’t scum because I can’t really do anything with him until he gets back except blind yeet him.

i dont think we're getting flea atm. amazing we've totted up 60 pages and we havent even managed to select 1 player who we want to consider more closely.

In post 1374, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1360, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1358, Titus wrote:Sitting on the sidelines

Feels like alot are doing that Titus

In post 1367, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1364, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1361, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1359, Titus wrote:I also have weak to moderate TRs on everyone else

Really? I only have 2 townreads.

I must be getting slow in my age.

I'm scared to ask how many SL+ reads you got o.o

One and its u

@Titus I think Bell is also. Momarangal is. Nero cain is when it doesn't concern him.

Me to a certain degree.

⊙Ռ⊙
So you have 2 town reads... 1 scumlean+....

and you're worried about people sitting on the sidelines....

He...called himself as doing it...?

yeah we resolved that.

In post 1422, Titus wrote:Syr, my thoughts on your slot have always been the absense of town makes your slot scummy. You and nacho are some of the best scumhunters on site. I expect to see some of that. Now with a reason for that absense plus an actual efforting post, I have something to reset off of.

I'm not opposed to a gamma yeet either.

VOTE: Gamma

I mean yeah, Nacho's a legend, but me? I'm just a crusty old fart that likes to post gifs. Or did, once. Appreciate it anyways, though <3
Pretty sure Nacho mentioned why I was gone and he definitely said he wouldn't be posting until Thursday, but we got there anyways.

In post 1468, Bell wrote:Is anyone even scum reading me anymore.

Pedit: ah, but he’s vacation chill posting. I really don’t expect content until he gets back from it.

Bell, you're doing the thing. Why would people be scumreading you?

In post 1475, Sugar Cain wrote:I miss the days where we only had a few pages a day

CAN I GET A FUCKING AMEN
#fuckhyperposting2021

In post 1478, Battle Mage wrote:His manner feels like it could be genuine. His posts haven't really stood out to me, but I think he made a couple of good takes.

In order of priority, I'd like to elim:

A scummy player
A useless player

Gamma is currently neither of the above.

What, in your opinion, has Gamma done in this game to disqualify him from being scummy or useless? Do you think his townread of you is legit?

In post 1486, Bell wrote:Amazing post if scum.

Why?

1. I think you're a good player as either alignment. Have you rolled scum yet since you got back?
2. DGB scum once accurately stated I was needy for town reads as town. It was true. I like being town read I try to play like town when I'm town etc. It's a playstyle thing. But it's also a positioning check/occassional trap for players to hand me a TR too easily or fight hard against a Town player being correctly recognized as town by other town. It sort of generates information that can be useful later.

4. It's a perfectly constructed, believable, explanation that is in line with a town POV. Recognizing their own proclivities/bad posting habits and/or unproductive behaviors and then writing it out clearly and plainly when explaining themselves is very townie imo.
I even have a little meta experience with fed up BM and this is him directly recognizing some of his problem behaviors and going against them to the favor of a town win con.

It's just a very neat emotional post. It's almost tidy in its perfection.
I could also be, dead wrong!

In post 1494, Battle Mage wrote:i dont think we're getting flea atm. amazing we've totted up 60 pages and we havent even managed to select 1 player who we want to consider more closely.

You want to know why this is?

You, Noraa hydra and Flea have more than half the posts by my estimation. You're drowning us out, making us work twice as hard to get half the reads.

@Syr, Don't sell yourself short. You and Nacho lead by example, sometimes you have to get your second or third best because it is best for town. Sometimes that means doing things you don't understand.

@Gamma, How would you feel about being conftown? Would that be good or bad?