Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 7:30 pm
HEM wagons feels p townie to me; is there someone on there you suspect MB?
This argument reinforces Wu scum even more. This isn’t the shining bullet you think it is.In post 1469, fireisredsir wrote:ok, looking at the progression of votes on those four players:In post 1459, MathBlade wrote:You’re not addressing the substance of why I think one of Datisi/Wu are scum though.In post 1457, Nero Cain wrote:my 1452 was straight-up a joke and had nothing to do with the game. But arguing that one of Dats/Wu has to be scum doesn't seem like a great argument, your sister was wrong as fuck when she used it and you're prob wrong too.
You’re referencing an irrelevant game
I don’t see why scum move from both Datisi/Wu onto HEM/me. Why?
253 - datisi (4), monkey (3), wu (0), monkey (0)
475 - wu (4), datisi (3), monkey (2), nordom (0)
625 - datisi (5), monkey (3), wu (1), nordom (0)
904 - datisi (5), nordom (3), monkey (2), wu (1)
1050 - datisi (4), nordom (4), monkey (2), wu (1)
1175 - monkey (5), datisi (3), wu (2), nordom (1)
1254 - monkey (6), nordom (4), wu (2), datisi (1)
saying that there were clear leading wagons of datisi/wu and that scum moved things to you/monkey is not backed up at all by what happened. monkey wagon came before wu. wu wagon, by the VCs, was actually never very prominent. there was one point out of 7 VCs where datisi/wu were the two leading ones, but it's super arbitrary to pick out that one.
the shift of things onto wu lately is actually the most interesting thing here, imo
b/c im a 2009 that's not a complete idiot.In post 1474, GeneralWu wrote:How do you keep knowing how many scum members there are?In post 1473, Nero Cain wrote:not really, that would mean 3/4 scum team got ran up today. I kinda think that's unlikely.
Still reading but Skitter.In post 1475, Aristeia wrote:HEM wagons feels p townie to me; is there someone on there you suspect MB?
Agreed. It points to you hard but maybe you can find an alternate narrativeIn post 1481, GeneralWu wrote:Assuming MathBlade is telling the truth, I think we have a good shot of catching scum among the people who were voting him and monkey. I just don't think wagons can get like this without scum interference.
can we just lim this instead pleaseIn post 1486, tenebrousluminary wrote:I would like to reiterate that I took HEM's side of things and only voted you, Math, because VPB was hassling me for voting Dragons. I will drop the subject here.
UNVOTE:
You know, I think this might mean that some people defending me are scum.In post 1483, MathBlade wrote:I think you are scum as people are defending you by attacking me versus explaining why they TR you.
That’s what she says she’s going to do.In post 1485, Aristeia wrote:why wouldn't she let NKs sort out a mason claim? ~.~ seems kind of common sense to me.
You changed this tune rather quickly. Maybe you are just scum after all.In post 1481, GeneralWu wrote:Assuming MathBlade is telling the truth, I think we have a good shot of catching scum among the people who were voting him and monkey. I just don't think wagons can get like this without scum interference.
skitterIn post 1488, GeneralWu wrote:You know, I think this might mean that some people defending me are scum.In post 1483, MathBlade wrote:I think you are scum as people are defending you by attacking me versus explaining why they TR you.
why notIn post 1426, MathBlade wrote:And monkey was painted to be scummy but wasn’t
The people defending you I suspect are scum as wellIn post 1488, GeneralWu wrote:You know, I think this might mean that some people defending me are scum.In post 1483, MathBlade wrote:I think you are scum as people are defending you by attacking me versus explaining why they TR you.
Because he’s a mason he can’t be scumIn post 1492, Cape90 wrote:why notIn post 1426, MathBlade wrote:And monkey was painted to be scummy but wasn’t
how so? serious question, I'm curious for your reasoning. i don't think it's a shining bullet (? lol), i have no horse in this race, im just trying to show you why your interpretation of events is not necessarily the reality, and that therefore the assumptions your making based off of your interpretation are kinda useless to the rest of usIn post 1478, MathBlade wrote:This argument reinforces Wu scum even more. This isn’t the shining bullet you think it is.
Further elaboratingIn post 1489, MathBlade wrote:That’s what she says she’s going to do.In post 1485, Aristeia wrote:why wouldn't she let NKs sort out a mason claim? ~.~ seems kind of common sense to me.
But instead she’s taking a kind of passive aggressive stance.
It’s different.
Did you read it?
Datisi top wagon becomesIn post 1495, fireisredsir wrote:how so? serious question, I'm curious for your reasoning. i don't think it's a shining bullet (? lol), i have no horse in this race, im just trying to show you why your interpretation of events is not necessarily the reality, and that therefore the assumptions your making based off of your interpretation are kinda useless to the rest of usIn post 1478, MathBlade wrote:This argument reinforces Wu scum even more. This isn’t the shining bullet you think it is.
can you expand on this, i am interested but i feel like I'm missing a step between the first half and the last half. if those two are supposed to be connected then i don't follow the logicIn post 1476, Nero Cain wrote:you know Math. It was mainly me _ fua that had driven the Wu wagon. if Wu were to flip town we get blamed. That back to back to back skitter-VP-Yet rapid voted on HEM is prob from scum.
Nothing scummy in the ISO...In post 1494, MathBlade wrote:Because he’s a mason he can’t be scumIn post 1492, Cape90 wrote:why notIn post 1426, MathBlade wrote:And monkey was painted to be scummy but wasn’t
Naturally scum say town are scummy
But there’s nothing scummy in the ISO