Nanook (1, Tactix)
Axelrod (1, Crola)
Not Voting: Axelrod, DarkLight140, Dragon Slayer, Electra, Mastermind of Sin, NanookTheWolf
Cam
Well, I realize that -- but it seemed like a reasonable trade off for the town; *I* knew there was an SK and that the doctor could very well still be alive, but no one else did. Further, I've already acted once, and failed. So my value to the town (and hence, my threat to the mafia) has diminished (without divulging details, I've only finitely many uses of my abilities...).DarkLight140 wrote: SubtleTactix, coming out as vigilante might have been a poor move on your part, as it sort of marks you for death, and lets them undo any successful kills you make.
You are being paranoid. I used the extension as a qualifier -- but only Nanook was pressing SV's innocence off that list (as a back-up doc).DarkLight140 wrote: That said, I don't appreciate the implication that you'd like to lynch Nanook today and vig me (or Axelrod, I guess) tonight. Or am I just being paranoid?
Oddly, I shared similar feelings for MoS, but felt there was more compelling (although still not iron-clad) evidence for Nanook.DarkLight140 wrote: That said, my thoughts on who the scum are, at the moment, are a bit underdeveloped and mostly consist of Mastermind of Sin being useless even after he got back from vacation. Which isn't a storng argument by any stretch.
No.Electra wrote:... Crola, have you ever been in a time travel game before?
My responsesTactix wrote:A. Mafia and SK targeted armlx night one.
B. There will be an attempted future kill, by a scum group.
C. A doc protected somebody night one
D. A roleblocker stopped the SK night one.
A little choppy, I know, but the point is, I'm a he, not a she.Tactix wrote:. . . Crola . . . based on her . . .
Look, I felt I was in a unique position, where my actions plus the end results told me a lot about what was going on.Crola wrote: Also, I think it's a really stupid idea that you role claimed Tactix, despite that you thought it was in the town's best interest, you've killed the vigilante in doing so, which in turn hurtsthe town greatly, so your noble act has actually hurt rather than helped.
My apologies. I'll keep it straight from now on.Crola wrote: A little choppy, I know, but the point is, I'm a he, not a she.
Woah, not a permanent Vig? So you're saying you have a limited amount of kills, or can you do a few different specific things? You've already claimed, but if you trully feel thet revealing your whole role will damage you or the town further, then please say so.Tactix wrote:Keep in mind, I am not a permanent vig. I have a small number of actions I can take, and I'v already used one.
Wait, shouldn't a vig be able to kill every night? Or do you mean limited time fuel? One or the other or both, which one is it?Tactix wrote:I mean only that I have a limited number of kills I can attempt. I have no other special abilities.
Well, I already answered this. Did you read my previous posts!? I did take an action last night, but scum 'beat me to the punch,' by killing Mgm on Night 1. Here's exactly what I said:Crola wrote: I'm not buying your vig story so far. You say you haven't killed yet, why? Most vigilantes would have killed by Day two.
If that doesn't answer why I haven't killed yet, I don't know what does.Earlier, Tactix wrote: Well, here's my action history (this should answer your questions, Axelrod):
Night 1: Did not act.
Night 2: Did not timetravel. Targeted Mgm. This "failed" b/c he already died on Night 1. (Doc should note this -- only consider protecting Mgm on Night 1 if I die on Night 1).
Okay, I may not be able to counter that completely, but I will say that why would a Vig, and I'm using your words here "spread information that's useful but not critical to the town," if it sacrifices his life. We weren't even suspicious of Tactix at first, then he role claims, and here's the only logic I can put behind it:DarkLight140 wrote:I would definitely agree that Crola's being a bit excessively inquistive. He's protown, he kills, he time-travels. We know he can't do either forever; asking more is pretty pointless. As for not buying his story, what's not to buy? Why in the world would a mafia/SK come out as a vig- obviously asking to be shot Night One by a real vig or mafia/SK in doing so- with no pressure at all, to spread information that's useful but not critical to the town? I don't see how it would make sense; if you do, pray enlighten me.
I agree with this, hence my vote on Tactix. Hes probably SK, saying he's Vig, that way he gets revived if he dies, since he'll come up as a non-townie. Also, either way he'd have a kill a night to justify both claims. I say down with Tactix!Dragon Slayer wrote:I guess I'm not helping then by saying that i'm a basic townie, with no time travel abilities at all (since most people have at least said if they can travel or not I might as well put this out there, if we go with the idea of reviving only townies then it may keep a night kill off me all together as it would be a waste for them).
Secondly, I think MoS can potentially be scum (mafia not sk i think). I think out SK is Tactix trying to pull a fast one on us. It seems too coincidental. First, the fact that vig is a common enough claim for SK cause they can claim to have accidently killed a townie that they thought was mafia, when they're actually the SK. Also, in his reasons for only one kill night one, he included in his last reason (4) that a role blocker stopped the SK. Perhaps here he is trying to talk about the SK to take the idea off him being the SK (not sure how confusing that sounds, hopefully you get hte idea). Also, he claims to have attempted to kill mgm last night but failed because he was killed night one. Perhaps he actually killed him night one and is lying now? WHy did you go for mgm anyway? And generally vig's don't get many kills, I usually only give mine one. It just doesn't feel right. My guy today tells me to go with tactix, though as I stated, Mgm has been suspicious. I need to do more reading on him. THen I'll vote between the two.
-DS