Mafiascum.net

↑ lewarcher82 wrote:This is my challenge.

Challenge Accepted.

lewarcher 147 wrote:Cutting short day 1 is an anti-town strategy, as it limits the chance of collecting information by the uninformed majority.

...until the next Day, anyway.

lewarcher 147 wrote:But the case that will likely get me lynched is based on me pointing out something anti-town

and then deciding

it was not a genuine scumtell.

I'm pretty sure you said the opposite earlier.

So, you're expecting to be saved by a Role Cop claim, saying that your wagon is obviously scum-driven (the driving scum in question being me and ????, ????, and ????), and going 1v1 with me because I am allegedly not following accepted site meta (where's SpyreX when I need him).

In the not-particularly-funny words of Jon Stewart: Srsly?

Cogito Ergo Sum 148 wrote:How you think this confirms your role, is beyond me.

Theoretically a Role Cop can investigate anyone and get a result, and then the investigated player can confirm or deny it. The downsides to this are:
*If the Role Cop is scum, they can investigate a scumpartner and get a predetermined fakeclaim
*If the Role Cop finds out that someone is a Vig or something, claiming their result is actually a bad thing
So the plan is not terrible.

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:

↑ Kublai Khan wrote:Elaborate on what? I've seen you defend yourself with selfmeta a bunch of times. I found it to be a hypocritical comment.

I'd love to see some examples of this.

The most recent example is in an on-going game. I don't feel like digging through old games to counter a pointless exchange, so consider the spit-take redacted.

VOTE: lewarcher82

First, I don't believe his claim. I'd prefer not to elaborate on why.

Second, I think xvart's been trying to prevent lewarcher82's lynch by trying two different counter-wagons since lewarcher82 has been at L-2 (on jasonT1981 and Quilford). Plus his arguments seem disingenuous. If we get a scum-flip, then we'll know who the partner is.

Third, I want to see if Roxi quick-hammers. It'll solve all the noise about it. If it's secret voting, it's scum.

↑ Amrun wrote:I told you the impression I got from the posts. You were fencesitting; it seemed you were defending him weakly on hand while looking for an excuse to hop on the wagon on the other.

I don't think it was "looking for an excuse to hop on the wagon" but rather "keeping the door open with the vagueness of how the behavior might also be scum".

↑ Sotty7 wrote:So... I'm scummy for finding Jason's first post in this game scummy? Your logic is getting really poor here. Every single post has a bearing on a players alignment. Also why didn't you pick on this apparently scummy move from me when I first mentioned it?

I wasn't clear when I spoke about the context as I don't find you particularly scummy (outside of a very tenuous relationship with people I do find scummy). When I said "given the context, it is scummy" I was referring to Quilford's projection of your vote in the context of what had transpired at the time of his vote. I don't think you can argue that your post ever indicated anything outside of a typical RVS vote, so Quilford knowing you are town from your RVS looking vote post is invalid and scummy, especially since he delayed producing that information for so long.

My point on why Quilford is scummy is because he assigned several motives to a series of votes and comments that, from my perspective, had not basis in reality. Jason had made one post (completely RVS) at the time of your vote. Your vote was just a vote with no explanation. He says you are town because a vote on Jason is a town thing to do. The leap in logic to make that conclusion is ridiculous given the posts that had occurred and looks to me like an attempt to justify his town read after the fact

↑ Kublai Khan wrote:Second, I think xvart's been trying to prevent lewarcher82's lynch by trying two different counter-wagons since lewarcher82 has been at L-2 (on jasonT1981 and Quilford). Plus his arguments seem disingenuous. If we get a scum-flip, then we'll know who the partner is.

Disingenuous? Nah, I believe there to be more substantial evidence against Quilford than lewarcher.

- tell me your pet name (and someone please take him off of L-1 at least until then).

You're really reaching xvart.

How many posts have to happen before people are allowed for form reads?

78

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:For the most part, yes. I get more serious as the game progresses.

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:78

fail.

I have re-read my ISO and I really don't understand the case on me. .



I am Mao-Tse-Tung, and I am a . Each night I can decide to visit a player. If that player has a cat, I will kill him. If that player has a dog, I will die. The flavour is connected with the real biography of my former cat Mao, who was killed by a dog.

In order to avoid a short day 1 and a stupid mislynch, I will accept to do as follows:

You unvote me, and tonight I will visit someone who will claim to have a dog (no full claim required, any dog will do). By doing that, I will be dead and flipped on the morning of day 2. You will quit wasting your time tunneling me, I will be dead anyway and today we can go on playing and discussing other cases. Despite Vi's tunneling, we might end up lynching someone who is actually scum. Also: I will get more time to analize the wagon on me and leave a legacy of reads.

I know it's weird, but it's the only strategy occurring to me.

↑ lewarcher82 wrote:



You unvote me, and tonight I will visit someone who will claim to have a dog (no full claim required, any dog will do)

Hmmm, I am not sure, but given dogs are stronger, than cats... this could be rolefishing.

What if your player has a cat AND a dog? You'll die and kill them too?

considering that mafia kills happen before other kills, I can't see this plan doing anything but failing

Since when? It's a good plan. Pie'd be proud.

Oh hey, it does. Still, if we can force the scum's hand that way, that's good for us.

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Since when? It's a good plan. Pie'd be proud.

Yeah, a good plan for scum. Make scummy claim, when scummy claim doesn't save self, change claim to something more pro-town, guarantee death over night, somehow survive the night, drown town in "why you rascally mafia roleblocker preventing me from killing myself last night" WIFOM. Been there, done that, bought the souvenir program.

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Since when? It's a good plan. Pie'd be proud.

Unvote, vote: jason

LOL... has this anything to do with me calling you out a few posts ago?

↑ Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:

↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Since when? It's a good plan. Pie'd be proud.

Yeah, a good plan for scum. Make scummy claim, when scummy claim doesn't save self, change claim to something more pro-town, guarantee death over night, somehow survive the night, drown town in "why you rascally mafia roleblocker preventing me from killing myself last night" WIFOM. Been there, done that, bought the souvenir program.

This.

I do think like Sotty said, Xvert is reaching. Many people post early reads (gut or otherwise) saying X is town, Y is scum just from the RVS and the fact he seems set on pushing Quil and Sotty on this is strange. I am keeping my vote on for now until he starts making sense and stops tunnelling this issue.

↑ Untrod Tripod wrote:considering that mafia kills happen before other kills, I can't see this plan doing anything but failing

I don't get it your point. Once I flip, I flip. However, suggesting this plan is the last pro-town thing I can do. If you don't like it, lynch me. But DDD cannot be as blind as he appears to be (I didn't change my claim, don't lie. I explained it and made it a full claim after I was put at L-1). And Vi cannot be so stubborn and unreasonable to support a quicklynch on day 1 for a case that lacks every credibility.

If you don't like the plan, lynch me. But then try to show some intellectual honesty and admit that the case is built on nothing. And kick Vi's ass for getting a power role lynched this way, in 72 hours on day 1, with a wagon that grew to L-2 in 6 hours.

Also note that there was probably a dog softclaim already. Which means I wouldn't need to ask anyone else to claim.

What's bothering me is that Lew's role claim doesn't seem to be even slightly beneficial to town.

how so? I am half a vig, half a flavour cop.

You're killing players based on whether the animal is a dog or a cat. I'd hope all of the scum weren't cats, that'd be a pretty silly set up.