Page 7 of 134
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:58 am
by Benmage
Oh right CCV should be under town.
I gotta go for now. When his games a go rack hangs. Asap.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:44 am
by redFF
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote: ↑ redFF wrote:guys guys guys
We're lynching shotty day 1, this is a foregone conclusion.
Let's talk about day 2.
Oh hey, nice to see you're here, redFF. Care to answer the question I've asked you to answer twice now and you keep dodging?
And why is it a foregone conclusion? I much prefer a rack lynch at the moment.
Benmage- explain red town. Not feeling it at all. Shotty-scum is another good question.
I'm not dodging anything, shotty is the day 1 lynch.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:47 am
by NihilisticNinja
↑ redFF wrote: ↑ NihilisticNinja wrote:
Oh hey, nice to see you're here, redFF. Care to answer the question I've asked you to answer twice now and you keep dodging?
And why is it a foregone conclusion? I much prefer a rack lynch at the moment.
Benmage- explain red town. Not feeling it at all. Shotty-scum is another good question.
I'm not dodging anything, shotty is the day 1 lynch.
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote:Red, CCV, Maxous, shotgun- what is your current read on Nero?
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote:
Nero- what are your current reads, and why? Particularly rack and redFF?
And redFF- what are your current reads and why? Particularly Nero Cain and rack?
And no, we aren't lynching Shotty solely on policy. A compelling case has yet to be made that that will be necessary. Find scum, please.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:51 am
by redFF
Nero agreed with me in the signup thread that a shotty policy lynch would be a good idea, before he knew his alignment. We just genuinely don't like playing with him and he is detrimental to town as any alignment.
I think you're tunneling on him with no real evidence tbh.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:52 am
by redFF
Here's the compelling case, he's a vi and i don't like him.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:52 am
by Maxous
↑ rack wrote:KK: Nero is currently null-leaning-scum.
Going through this..
You think Nero might be scum (as you are leaning scum). Presumably because of what he is posting early game.
So you decide to tell Nero to
stop
what he is posting.
Because you otherwise...might get a better read on your scum suspect?
If you think he might be scum why would you tell him to stop his line of posting exactly, rather than let him continue?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:53 am
by Maxous
*Ahem
I knew this...moving along
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote:Red, CCV, Maxous, shotgun- what is your current read on Nero?
Meh
↑ Pine wrote:Mastin strike me as Town.
Why?
And I echo KK about scooby.
↑ Lady Lambdadelta wrote: I mean, you either HONESTLY BELIEVE that someone would lynch Mastin based off playstyle. (In which case you're incredibly stupid).
To be fair, there are players that would do that.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:54 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
@Maxous: To be fair, do you think I'm one of them?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:00 am
by NihilisticNinja
↑ redFF wrote:Nero agreed with me in the signup thread that a shotty policy lynch would be a good idea, before he knew his alignment. We just genuinely don't like playing with him and he is detrimental to town as any alignment.
I think you're tunneling on him with no real evidence tbh.
... Who said anything about Nero being scum, Red?
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote:Sigh. Beginning to think that this is a town v. town argument, so I'm not pushing it any further.
I'm honestly beginning to get a stubborn town read from Nero. In fact, if you go through my ISO, you'll see plenty of posts where I don't mention Nero at all. The main reason why I'm trying to draw out Nero reads is due to how active he's been in this game.
And I notice that you deflected my question yet again- what are your current reads, Red? Outside of the hydra issue and shotty being a VI, any thoughts on how the game has developed thus far?
Also, Maxous gets some townie points.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:20 am
by Maxous
In this game, no.
In general, maybe
I honestly don't know.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:26 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
↑ Maxous wrote:
In this game, no.
In general, maybe
I honestly don't know.
:/
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:29 am
by jasonT1981
what the fuck.... 7 pages before game even opens? it wasnt even a full page last time I checked in.
Sigh, this is why i do confirms via PM. Guess its time to read through all this.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:38 am
by HezLucky
redFF wrote:Honestly a shotty pl is beneficial for a number of reasons.
1. He's a VI.
2. He's annoying.
3. He could be scum.
4. We have a duty to the site as a whole to do it, if he keeps getting lynched day 1 of every game he might leave.
Why are you avoiding the Nero wagon?
FOS: red
I HATE policy lynches.
{welcome to the only consistent part of my meta}
Nero is ignoring me. This is suspect. Why isn't he responding to my accusations?
I also suspect Nero accepted my wavre challenge (say wavre or get tunneled, he chose the latter) in an attempt to gain towncred.
He needs to die.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:32 am
by Nero Cain
oh crap!!! Hez pegged me!!!!
(is this still the lulz tunnel or you snerious?)
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:41 am
by HezLucky
↑ Nero Cain wrote:oh crap!!! Hez pegged me!!!!
(is this still the lulz tunnel or you snerious?)
Where did I ever suggest in my original post that there would be any lulz associated with any of this?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:04 am
by Benmage
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote: A compelling case has yet to be made that that will be necessary. Find scum, please.
What type of compelling case could you possible expect... in the confirmation stage rofl. But really.. this early. There's no cases. PL is the best case you could really expect.
I mean who are your top scum reads, and what cases do you have? (You don't really have to answer this, just making a point)
That said. redff, you're a broken record at this point. Wait to the game starts, or talk about something else.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:07 am
by Benmage
Nero needs to be vigged.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:09 am
by NihilisticNinja
↑ HezLucky wrote: ↑ Nero Cain wrote:oh crap!!! Hez pegged me!!!!
(is this still the lulz tunnel or you snerious?)
Where did I ever suggest in my original post that there would be any lulz associated with any of this?
Reads other than on Nero and redFF please.
Also, what Nero wagon are you talking about? I think we've all moved to greener pastures.
Benmage: I'll respond anyway. :p
I made a detailed case against rack, and have made points against both redFF and Pine. And no, a PL case is not the best case you can expect when you've had 7 pages of actual content. We have plenty of content to scumhunt with.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:28 am
by Benmage
Post 110 aint exactly a detailed case.
Though it explains the reasoning for why we are all suspicious of rack. He rattled off a few really empty questions to look busy. We just need PV to launch this, and I have a fine new noose I'd like to introduce him to intimately.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:34 am
by NihilisticNinja
↑ Benmage wrote:Post 110 aint exactly a detailed case.
It was an explanation of how both the posts they had made were scummy, backed up by a response in #101, noting another scummy point in their second post. Exactly how are you defining a "detailed case"?
And can we please not direct a vig that we don't even know exists? I'm not sure how on Earth that could be a smart idea.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:41 am
by Benmage
I dont feel like wasting fine rope on nero.
Lot of people don't know how to properly use PRs, nothing wrong with suggested guidance. Stick with me NN
I like you thus far. (zomgbuddying)
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:16 am
by Pine
LLD, you said AT LEAST two or three times that Mastin needed to die or he deserved a lynch. I even quoted one of them in my last post. If you're now saying that you didn't mean it, fine, that's your problem. Looked pretty fucking genuine to me.
The distancing between LLD and Rack is mostly from Rack's side. They had a small, toothless spat, then moved past it into ignoring one another. By itself, entirely circumstantial. Combined with
independent
scumreads on both, it looks like distancing.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:29 am
by redFF
↑ NihilisticNinja wrote: ↑ redFF wrote:Nero agreed with me in the signup thread that a shotty policy lynch would be a good idea, before he knew his alignment. We just genuinely don't like playing with him and he is detrimental to town as any alignment.
I think you're tunneling on him with no real evidence tbh.
... Who said anything about Nero being scum, Red?
Erm you asked me for my read on him and I gave it to you...
Why would you be pushing him and asking everyone for reads on him if you didn't think he was scummy?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:54 am
by Firestarter
I've been keeping an eye on/skimming this thread over my phone the last few days...
Im off work tomorrow, so Ill have my thoughts posted after a re-read.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:12 pm
by Nero Cain
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:what the fuck.... 7 pages before game even opens? it wasnt even a full page last time I checked in.
Sigh, this is why i do confirms via PM. Guess its time to read through all this.
Why do you have an issue with more scumhunting?
↑ Benmage wrote:Nero needs to be vigged.
oh go be useless elsewhere