ya we found 2 scums already in mikehart and ode but we need some ox to pull dis fuckin wagon along BEFORE WE DIE OF DYSENTERY
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:14 pm
by Nero Cain
↑FuDuzn wrote:Wasn't nero complaining that Elmo would flake on this game? That is some tasty irony.
can you blame me? Irony tastes
sooooooooooooooooooooo
good.
UT's excuse that he was starting the game by bandwagoning is terrible.
Do you think Hart is scum?
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:40 pm
by Nocmen
↑Untrod Tripod wrote:to the people criticizing the bandwagoning and whatnot, I ask what your preferred method of starting a game is. unless you have a cop guilty on someone I'm pretty sure this sort of thing is the best way. also just the reactions to the bandwagoning have been helpful, so
this has been a success so far
Exactly. Even though I think you're scum, it's still a reaction to the wagon. There's something to say about the lack of other backlash to the wagon.
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:40 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
We're still here. Reading and stuff. Expect post tomorrow.
↑Locke Lamora wrote:Triple D, do you think Mike should be put at L-1?
Child Please, I think he should be put at L-0.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:25 am
by mikehart
Screw this. Revelation time. Ddd and I are in a neighboorhood together because he drafted Gronk and I drafted Hernandez. I was busy and didnt post in the neighboorhood qt until either right before day started or right after. He posted the same day we won our players to say hi and then two or maybe three days later he said that the other neighboor sucked. I then put up my initial post saying I was busy and saying hi and he has been tunneling on me since. I've tried to get him to explain why he thinks im scum in the qt but he refuses. Again, I have no idea why he has decided to tunnel me so hard but he still has yet to bring any sort of argument for why im scum.
Also, ddd I want an answer on wether you have a post restriction because you do not use the phrase in the qt. Its fairly obvious to anyone who has seen the show who you are softclaiming/breadcrumbing otherwise.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:18 am
by Glork
yep, totes predicted/assumed some neighbrhood hot sauce, but what I did NOT predict was that it came from drafted players.
to me, this makes the wagon/lynch a bit less interesting so I'd be willing to fry Druid's taco instead.
mikehart is obv frustrated, and claiming player names was an extremely retarded idea, but whether it's frustrated town or scum isnt so black and white
wanna hear from disco master ddd himself first, then i'll decide whether (and where) to move my vooooote.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:56 am
by SpyreX
If that's the extent of it and I'll wait for DDD to confirm, then I'm not as excited about that blood.
Child, please. You were pretty obviously rolefishing. It’d be more intellectually honest if you just admitted to it.
Also, I missed this earlier. Are you intentionally being an idiot? This has been explained a hundred times already. At this point, if you actually still believe we were trying to rolefish, you're intentionally misrepping. Also, after looking at your ISO, your play has been horrible. I don't like the vote on mike and everything that's followed it.
What's with the "child please?" I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but apparently that's a common saying on The League. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_League
Can't tell if post restriction or freewill.
Post stuffed back inside the hydra. Try to keep it that way. ~Amrun
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:52 am
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Oops. Not like it was a secret anyway.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:11 am
by Elmo TeH AzN
Um you said it was just one of you
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:41 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Other head:
Not liking Glork's play.
Disclaimer:
READ the case before you just toss it aside like it's nothing. It's relatively small. Just fucking read it.
Post 116: Says he's just sheeping DDD and voting, putting a 4th vote on a wagon with no reasoning. Looks very opportunistic on the mike bandwagon. Also:
Glork wrote:Also, it's worth noting that DDD
has faked a post restriction as town
in the Scummies WINvitational (even though I really wanted to slug him for it). I like what FuDuzn is doing, but he's barking up the wrong tree if he thinks he's going to get much out of DDD.
In light of the post restriction my other head brought up, two things can be noted it seems: 1) He already could have known about DDD's restriction (pure coincidence?). A point similar to this is supported later, so just wait. 2) He tries to paint him as town with a restriction.
Post 117: Refers to mafia strategy. I have seen this as a tactic by mafia to look as if they are looking out for town's best interest. Speculation of scum's actions aren't very good.
Post 118: Almost tries to backtrack and says "Fuck you" to anyone who brings up his speculation on power roles. But wait it gets better, because later he throws in the idea that we rolefished when he did something similar with 2 possible PR's and said made it so no one accuse him on it because in his triple post he noted that he was doing it.
Post 135: Useless posting with no analysis but accusatory still. Also, more buddying with DDD.
Glork wrote:yep, totes predicted/assumed some neighbrhood hot sauce, but what I did NOT predict was that it came from drafted players.
This goes back to already seeming to know about DDD's restriction, he admits he might have already known about his neighborhood too indirectly here. It might be nothing, but there are a lot of "coincidences" that he's making a connection between himself and DDD with here it seems.
Glork wrote:to me, this makes the wagon/lynch a bit less interesting so I'd be willing to fry Druid's taco instead.
Translation: I've already hopped on the mike wagon with no reasoning. So if this falls apart in light of his new evidence, I'll make a statement so I can jump on ODM just in case and be able to say I had suspicion of them already.
Also, Triple D P......do you have a post restriction?
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:03 pm
by Glork
ODM, you're cute when you put on your little black dress and try to act all high-brow, but answer me two things:
1) How did you get "Gork knew about the post restriction in advance" when all I did was respond to FuDuzn
ASKING IF DISCO MASTER DDD HAD A POST RESTRICITON
? Or are you so blue in the face that I've caught you as scum already that you're resorting to shit tactics on Page 7?
2) How does "I guessed they were in a neighborhood together" translate to "seeming to know about [Disco Master] DDD's post restriction"? Disco Master DDD obviously had some role-based reason to go after mikehart with a SERIOUS vote on Page 1, and I had discounted an immediate daycop (because honestly, why the fuck would anybody do that before they got some kind of reads on players), and "bad neighbor behavior" was the next most likely option. Don't hate because I've got better mafia instincts than you, blue-face.
Nice OMGUS, but you can scat, cat.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:12 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
↑Glork wrote:ODM, you're cute when you put on your little black dress and try to act all high-brow,
You can cut that out now. No place for it.
↑Glork wrote:1) How did you get "Gork knew about the post restriction in advance" when all I did was respond to FuDuzn
ASKING IF DISCO MASTER DDD HAD A POST RESTRICITON
? Or are you so blue in the face that I've caught you as scum already that you're resorting to shit tactics on Page 7?
Why are you trying to paint us as "blue in the face?" Is there a reason behind your attempt at making us look this way? Nice try, though. You've done absolutely jack diddly shit to "catch us as scum," and at no point in the game have we even been close to being "blue in the face." Situation noted.
↑Glork wrote:2) How does "I guessed they were in a neighborhood together" translate to "seeming to know about [Disco Master] DDD's post restriction"? Disco Master DDD obviously had some role-based reason to go after mikehart with a SERIOUS vote on Page 1, and I had discounted an immediate daycop (because honestly, why the fuck would anybody do that before they got some kind of reads on players), and "bad neighbor behavior" was the next most likely option. Don't hate because I've got better mafia instincts than you, blue-face.
Is it obvious that DDD has a role-based reason? How do you know this? Very WIFOMy. You have not proven you have "better mafia instincts" than anyone, by the way. Maybe a little sub-par, to be frank.
Oh, no. You've finally gone insane. Not once have you placed a vote on us, despite catching us as scum.
Grease up the lynch, boys.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:12 pm
by Glork
Also, ODM, how is 118 "almost a backtrack," when I reiterated that my idea was fucking ingenious, and that protown players were probably nodding their heads in green-light agreement?
SHIT TACTICS GALORE, YOU BUFFALO.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:17 pm
by Glork
↑ObliviousDruidMuncher wrote:You have not proven you have "better mafia instincts" than anyone, by the way.
I'm considered one of the best mafia pleyers in site history, scat-cat. I'm just going to leave these here, next to the giant tub of ice cream you're going to need later on (btw, Gaspar is a public Glork-alt):
"Johnny Cochrane" for Best Role Claim 2007: "Auguste Maquet" in California Trilogy - Dantès in Fresno
"Oscar" for Best Individual Town Performance 2008: California Trilogy - Going to San Francisco
Glork
"Paragon of Mafia Hunters" for Best Mafia Catcher 2006
"Paragon of Mafia Hunters" for Best Mafia Catcher 2010: Square Enix Mafia I: Diabolus Eres
And yes, it is obvious to anybody who's halfway competent at mafia that Disco Master DDD had a role-based reason.
↑ObliviousDruidMuncher wrote:You have not proven you have "better mafia instincts" than anyone, by the way.
I'm considered one of the best mafia pleyers in site history, scat-cat. I'm just going to leave these here, next to the giant tub of ice cream you're going to need later on (btw, Gaspar is a public Glork-alt):
"Johnny Cochrane" for Best Role Claim 2007: "Auguste Maquet" in California Trilogy - Dantès in Fresno
"Oscar" for Best Individual Town Performance 2008: California Trilogy - Going to San Francisco
Glork
"Paragon of Mafia Hunters" for Best Mafia Catcher 2006
"Paragon of Mafia Hunters" for Best Mafia Catcher 2010: Square Enix Mafia I: Diabolus Eres
And yes, it is obvious to anybody who's halfway competent at mafia that Disco Master DDD had a role-based reason.
[/egopost]
I'm going to ask you to refrain from using your ego as a method of defending your reads.
I'm asking nicely see? Please? Don't do it?
Because it's incredibly pompous and makes me want to ignore every word you say. And that's not good.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:32 pm
by Glork
I responded directly to a player saying that I have "sub-par" mafia instincts by providing evidence that I do have good mafia instincts, and included an [/end] tag to said egopost, so you don't have to worry about me trampling over this game like a herd of stampeeding buffalo, LLD.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:33 pm
by SpyreX
Except in this instance he's right and if ODM is gonna go OHH YEA the only response is YEA?
The only issue is ODM is stumbling around so much I have a hard time buying that as scum
