Mafiascum.net

↑ Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:

↑ VP Baltar wrote:You too can still fit in with the cool kids by saying who is scum. And don't say the guy who confirmed a town on page one. That's just sad. If you have no scum reads at this point, then I pity the fool...

If you think I'm going to give you credit for an unimaginative reaction test you've got another thing comin'.

So am I your top suspect or what? You're really being coy about a pretty simple question.

I'm pretty sure there was at least one other BUT w/e.

My posts are shorter now. Also, I was blind to Katy's charms.

Nachomamma8 wrote:i am buddying up to lev, jesus
why does it make me scum?

While being respectful is always good, buddying up is anti-town. It's not that hard to figure out. Scum want town players to support them, and they also want town players to go down if they get lynched, which is good for buddying up. I think that your buddying looks more like the first scenario, as it seems too blatant to be the second. (Maybe I'm wrong, maybe it's WIFOM, but you have to know how to outguess people from time to time when you are scumhunting.) Town-aligned players don't really have a good reason to buddy up to specific players in the town. It's not a pro-town thing to do. So it's scummy. Get it now?

leviathan93 wrote:This post makes me very suspicious of Fermata. It makes me see that scum is in he or Nacho and i would choose Restfermata as the scummy one.

I don't see what was scummy about the way I addressed the Nacho business, and how it makes one of us necessarily scum. Care to explain the logic behind your statement, or is that more of your "philosophy"?

I don't believe in policy lynching. I'm happy with where my vote is because of the way lev is acting in this game, which is the only game I know and the only game I really think is helpful to look at.

↑ RestFermata wrote:While being respectful is always good, buddying up is anti-town. It's not that hard to figure out. Scum want town players to support them, and they also want town players to go down if they get lynched, which is good for buddying up. I think that your buddying looks more like the first scenario, as it seems too blatant to be the second. (Maybe I'm wrong, maybe it's WIFOM, but you have to know how to outguess people from time to time when you are scumhunting.) Town-aligned players don't really have a good reason to buddy up to specific players in the town. It's not a pro-town thing to do. So it's scummy. Get it now?

wow this is a bunch of reasons for you to vote me instead of chilling on an easy lynch
so, um.
why are you chilling on an easy lynch?
and why haven't you commented on the DDD awesomewagon?

1. Because I think lev is scummy, and my suspicions of buddying only make sense if lev is town. I'm not convinced of that.

2. Because I like to process and comment on one thing at a time unless I'm going to commit myself to a long tl;dr full analysis post. And I don't feel like making one right now. I also haven't really gained any reads on that yet--kind of still waiting for DDD to come back with some actual reads, like I said earlier. He seems stubborn, which could go either way for me.

↑ RestFermata wrote:Because I think lev is scummy, and my suspicions of buddying only make sense if lev is town. I'm not convinced of that.

but you said there was no motivation for town to buddy
which still makes me scum

No, I said there's no really good reason for it. There could be poorly-conceived reasons. I think it's anti-town and scummy, but it's my #1 scumtell that's being "buddied up" to, so that makes it a weaker tell for me. It's not the end-all of scumtells.

↑ RestFermata wrote:1. Because I think lev is scummy, and my suspicions of buddying only make sense if lev is town. I'm not convinced of that.

2. Because I like to process and comment on one thing at a time unless I'm going to commit myself to a long tl;dr full analysis post. And I don't feel like making one right now. I also haven't really gained any reads on that yet--kind of still waiting for DDD to come back with some actual reads, like I said earlier. He seems stubborn, which could go either way for me.

by your logic you believe that both Nacho and I are scum. you are saying you think i'm scum and then nacho "buddies up to me" and you assume that he is scum as well because buddying is anti-town.

therefore in your own logic we have found both scum. nacho and I. because you refuse to see either of us as NOT scum.

however, I see the situation differently. i see you as scum naming two scum with little REAL evidence.

1. you think i'm scummy for the way i post and act, but YET you refuse to check other games to compare that. (lazy scum in my opinion is lazy)

2. you think nacho is scummy for buddying up to me because it is anti-town. however, if this were true then he would be scummy and I would be town, but yet you refuse to see that or am convinced of that as well so we are both scummy.

now to my points.

1. if nacho were buddying up to me i would understand that he would seem very scummy ESPECIALLY when no one else sees what he sees as me being town or possibly town. however to me, this also would confirm me as TOWN because scum wouldn't obviously buddy up to other scum. it would make one of them look very bad. but you don't see that. That's suspicious to me.

2. I highly doubt that the game is finished as you apparently would think if BOTH nacho and I are scummy. I personally know i'm innocent so that would only leave nacho to be possible scum which i agree with you i am slightly suspicious of because he was the only one who was willing to not throw me under the bus even though he IS right about the fact that i am town.

so yes my vote at the moment. VOTE: restfermata

lev, you're either misunderstanding or misrepresenting me. Nacho is scummy if you are town. You two are my top scumtells, but you contradict each other and I have even mentioned and acknowledged that. I think that one of you is town and the other is likely scum, because I don't think I'm wrong about both of you. You're scummier than Nacho in my mind, so my vote's on you. Can you wrap your mind around it?

↑ leviathan93 wrote:1. you think i'm scummy for the way i post and act, but YET you refuse to check other games to compare that. (lazy scum in my opinion is lazy)

Didn't you claim that laziness was NOT a scumtell just 2 pages ago or something?

I'd also like to point out that people hide behind their meta, and I have seen players get away with it. I think that's exactly what you're doing, as you keep insisting that we all check your meta as an excuse for any scummy behavior. At the very least, if you always tell people to check your meta as town, you would have to also do it as scum, otherwise people who DO like to check up on people's meta WOULD be suspicious. So "I always act that way!" is not the towntell you seem to think it is.