Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:53 am
Holy shit, 6 pages? I need to pay more attention. >.>
I need to go read, my bad. Hope I didn't hammer anyone.
I need to go read, my bad. Hope I didn't hammer anyone.
Page 7 of 93
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:53 am
never mind. L-2 actually.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:54 am
L-3, rather. God I wish I had edit feature right now.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:59 am
↑ Disturbed_One wrote:Holy shit, 6 pages? I need to pay more attention. >.>
I need to go read, my bad. Hope I didn't hammer anyone.
And unvoting was not in consideration at all when you realized you put Rach at L-1?
Really?
Rach is town for this terrible wagon.Icebox wrote:Ok. This is what is happening.
Rem thinks Rach is scummy based on her meta and stuff. Me, not so much convinced.
I have played a game with Varsoon before, and the way I'm doing (at least, was doing, thanks to Rem) is the best way to read Varsoon for me, since his thought process is pretty easy to follow. While talking with Varsoon this way, I can see his motive behind his posts easily. Hence my push there. Also about not knowing "absolute statement" is: I'm serious on this one. English is not my native language and sometimes I have hard time understanding some of the words/concept/etc.
Also those "fluffs," well that's Rem for you.
So while Rem is not here, let me continue to do my stuff.
VOTE: Varsoon
Also about those push on Rach, I'll let Rem explain those.
-G
Can the two of you sign your posts, it's really frustrating. So I assume the person taking you guys off Rach was...Rem, and you're the person who initially voted Varsoon?
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:00 am
@Selkies: Pretty much.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:02 am
But why did both of you ignore Rach while the wagon was building?
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:05 am
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:06 am
Okay, actually woke up a little earlier than expected.
I don't really agree with any of Selkies' Icebox case, except that his vote on Varsoon is pretty weird, and his next post trying to reinforce it.
Also, notice you give Icebox crap for not really saying anything in L-1, but leaving Majiffy alone. Actually, you haven't even mentioned Majiffy (with a simple Ctrl+F in your ISO, anyway, will do a more complete read of the ISO when I have more time).
I don't see scum motivation for Varsoon to say any of what he's said so far, either.
Why is Rach town for that terrible wagon? I don't get it.
I don't really agree with any of Selkies' Icebox case, except that his vote on Varsoon is pretty weird, and his next post trying to reinforce it.
Also, notice you give Icebox crap for not really saying anything in L-1, but leaving Majiffy alone. Actually, you haven't even mentioned Majiffy (with a simple Ctrl+F in your ISO, anyway, will do a more complete read of the ISO when I have more time).
I don't see scum motivation for Varsoon to say any of what he's said so far, either.
Why is Rach town for that terrible wagon? I don't get it.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:07 am
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:07 am
dude wtf
p-edit - I see you're called out six ways from Sunday already.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:09 am
↑ Does Bo Know wrote:Okay, actually woke up a little earlier than expected.
I don't really agree with any of Selkies' Icebox case, except that his vote on Varsoon is pretty weird, and his next post trying to reinforce it.
Also, notice you give Icebox crap for not really saying anything in L-1, but leaving Majiffy alone. Actually, you haven't even mentioned Majiffy (with a simple Ctrl+F in your ISO, anyway, will do a more complete read of the ISO when I have more time).
I don't see scum motivation for Varsoon to say any of what he's said so far, either.
Why is Rach town for that terrible wagon? I don't get it.
I don't either
-f
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:11 am
Sure.
You /need/ to say why you disagree with cases.Does Bo Know wrote:Okay, actually woke up a little earlier than expected.
I don't really agree with any of Selkies' Icebox case, except that his vote on Varsoon is pretty weird, and his next post trying to reinforce it.
Also, notice you give Icebox crap for not really saying anything in L-1, but leaving Majiffy alone. Actually, you haven't even mentioned Majiffy (with a simple Ctrl+F in your ISO, anyway, will do a more complete read of the ISO when I have more time).
I don't see scum motivation for Varsoon to say any of what he's said so far, either.
Why is Rach town for that terrible wagon? I don't get it.
I haven't talked about Majiffy because...oh yeah, there's nothing to talk about. Right. He entered, gave a RVS L-1, and left. So he effectively hasn't been here. Why would I talk about Majiffy?
How about Varsoon faking to scumhunt?
I don't like several votes on Rach. Majiffy, but that's RVS for you. More importantly, Icebox, D_O, Sven, and my scumreads on the people on Rach's wagon makes Rach likely to be town from my perspective.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:11 am
*on some people on Rach's wagon
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:13 am
I just remembered that Majiffy doesn't play RVS.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:14 am
Just woke up, rolling over the thread.
When I get some more time, I'll address the posts that talk about me and the overall state of the game.
Sorry for being so inactive so far, you guys are pretty good at posting outside of my usual active hours.
When I get some more time, I'll address the posts that talk about me and the overall state of the game.
Sorry for being so inactive so far, you guys are pretty good at posting outside of my usual active hours.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:15 am
So I would love to hear from Majiffy why he voted Rach to L-1.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:17 am
I'm really not sure what's going on here
Ignore being you didn't comment on Rach's wagon, what other interpretations exist?
Oh, really?
Huh.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:17 am
Other than what's been asked so far in the thread,
does anyone have any other questions for me?
I guess you will once I give the mammoth post I'll likely be dropping later.
Glad to be in another game with people from my first, I kinda liked you guys. Doesn't rule you outta being scum in this one though. We'll see. Right now I have some scum reads. Gonna try to avoid nulls.
does anyone have any other questions for me?
I guess you will once I give the mammoth post I'll likely be dropping later.
Glad to be in another game with people from my first, I kinda liked you guys. Doesn't rule you outta being scum in this one though. We'll see. Right now I have some scum reads. Gonna try to avoid nulls.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:18 am
Icebox I asked this twice now, and you've played with Varsoon. Is he normally snarky?
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:20 am
Okay so as for my RachMarie vote, it was actually intended to be an RVS vote. I somehow didn't see any other posts past from day 1, so the vote I made was based on the information I had read from there.
I have read through the 7 pages now with some slight skimming, at the moment I'm most convinced of Sven being scum because of the case Bo made in post 104.
UNVOTE: RachMarie[/uvote]
VOTE: Svenskt
Will continue to read and form more opinions.
I have read through the 7 pages now with some slight skimming, at the moment I'm most convinced of Sven being scum because of the case Bo made in post 104.
UNVOTE: RachMarie[/uvote]
VOTE: Svenskt
Will continue to read and form more opinions.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:21 am
Oh God. Fixing vote tags.
UNVOTE: RachMarie
VOTE: Svenskt
UNVOTE: RachMarie
VOTE: Svenskt
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:22 am
I was gonna say why I disagreed later today when I had more time.
School now
School now
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:23 am
Personally, I feel like I'm a little snarky. I don't really like when other people are jerks, though.
Newbie 1339 is my first completed game.
Mini 1441 is a game where I am quick hammered out of RVS and I disagree with people being jerks.
Currently also enrolled in Mini 157 and Newbie 1356.
Newbie 1339 is my first completed game.
Mini 1441 is a game where I am quick hammered out of RVS and I disagree with people being jerks.
Currently also enrolled in Mini 157 and Newbie 1356.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:25 am
@Selkies: About Varsoon, yes.
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:28 am
Well I did comment on Majiffy putting Rach in L-1. 
Also, it's not really ignoring the wagon, but rather Rem missing his timing to comment on Rach.
-G
Also, it's not really ignoring the wagon, but rather Rem missing his timing to comment on Rach.
-G